Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Gulf War Veterans 90-91 Forgotten/lost?

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Gulf War Veterans 90-91 Forgotten/Lost?

Posted on October 31, 2009 by dsnurse

Gulf War Veterans Forgotten in the US House of Representatives and US Senate?

Gulf War Veterans have been asking for Senate VA Committee Hearings or Joint House and Senate VA Committee Hearing in regards to the loss of a 75 million dollar research effort at Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas led by DR Haley. Its supporters Ross Perot and Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson have been strangely quiet. The major media has also chosen not to investigate and report this story.

Now after having the House VA Committee- Subcommittee scheduled for a third hearing on Gulf War Illness and Research on November 4, 2009. The announcement on the House VA subcommittee site on the internet that had been posted with no information on who was testifying is mysteriously removed from the website on Thursday.

WE have confirmed it was canceled. Some comment of possible reschedule. Despite calls to the subcommittee and emails over the last several weeks, not one of the staffers reply to emails or phone calls seeking further information.

When Chairman of the subcommittee, Representative Mitchell (D-5th district) AZ DC office was contacted no staffer has returned the call when we asked for further information on the hearing, witnesses, or reason for cancellation. WE either have a swine flu outbreak on the hill in DC or the only issue in town on the Hill is Health Care Reform. Gulf War Veterans 90-91 are being left out in the cold with no answers! Our answer is no to national health care and raise the question if the government can not answer and help the illl Gulf War Veterans how can they take care of legal immigrants or those civilians without insurance?

How can the government ignore Veterans that have been ill for 19 years? Is the national health care bill the way? WE also notice that Defense Appropriations bill has yet to come out of conference for final approval and to be sent to President for signature into Law! A number of appropriations bills are still awaiting action at the end of October when they should already be passed and signed. Are they holding the government as a hostage or what?

When the CFIDS Civilians have a Hard hitting Breaking Research Finding of a new Retrovirus that has the CDC, HHS, and Blood Safety Department in the RED HOT Spotlight and a landmark meeting the last two days re HHS CFIDS Advisory Committee, we wonder and reflect on their history over the last 20-30 years of denial. There are indeed similarities...we gulf war veterans were also told it was all in our heads, psychological, PTSD, psychosomatic, somatiform illness and regular doctors had no help or answers for us.

Well at least we have the VA Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Illness meeting in DC November 2-3. Maybe we will have company for that hearing from the politicians and staffers on the Hill. Where is the Change we thought President Obama would bring? Where is the transparency of the Democratic Party? Answers are needed urgently NOW!

http://www.veteranstoday.com/article9203.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Consider that the Korean War is almost totally forgotten. Vietnam is forgotten except as a negative as in " This war in Afghanistan is turning into another Vietnam". The Gulf War was such a total and quick victory. The vets were forgotten almost as fast as they returned home, except when they got sick years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is a shame is that we Gulf 1 vets are lumped in with todays OIF/OEF vets as "Southwest Aisa Vets" by everyone. So the focus ends up being on the vets of OIF/OEF since the VA doesn't want to end up with more issues regarding lack or treatment or disregard towards todays returning vets.

So the 500,000 Gulf 1 vets are forgotten. I notice it in my VFW magazines too. It's as though the military stopped existing between 1975-2001 from what I read. VFW forgets Panama, Grenada, Beirut,Kuwait, etc. and goes right from Vietnam to Iraq/Afghanistan. I would have thought that something like discovering the remains of the only MIA from Gulf 1 (pilot shot down, remains recently discovered) would rate a big writeup but instead get stuff like a article crying about Ivy League schools not offering ROTC. That sounds more like a political than Pro-Vet issue to me.

I am happy the older and younger vets are getting their due, but just like the Vietnam vets were written off in the 70's-80's we are being treated the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I'm a Gulf 1 era vet and this stuff really frustrates me (add to list of triggers, especially when I find out the Federal government is funding a puppet theater in Atlanta (http://www.myatltv.com/news/article_news.aspx?storyid=135275). If Abraham Lincoln was still alive today, this would not be happening.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Abe Lincoln were still alive I think we would be in BIG trouble! Like zombie type trouble!

Just kidding.

Ya know what gets me is that I did the "Persian Gulf Registry" a week after my enlistment ended and all VA is able to come up with is the blood test results and that was after building a telephone relationship with a very nice lady at the Los Angeles VA Hospital (I live in NY now). She said that they must have "lost" the other paperwork..... which would of course support my PTSD diagnosis going back to the end of my enlistment.

I have been asked many times to "take the registry exam" and when I tell them I did in 1994 they all look at me like I'm crazy, as in "We didn't go into Afghanistan until 2001 and Iraq til 2003, how could he have done it in 1994?"

I even used the fact that I have been receiving the "Persian Gulf Review" since 1994 as proof that I didn't abandone a claim but that VA didn't update their info on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You know the vast majority of vets using the VAMC are Vietnam Era vets. The young guys don't use it. Just the sick, old and poor mostly. On entering the VAMC you get the Last Rights, a cane and a walker and the address of the closest VA cemetary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use