Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pending Soc For Earlier Effective Date For Skull Loss

Rate this question


RockyA1911

Question

I had been awaiting a SOC for the appeal for earlier effective date back to 28 Nov 1976 as that was the original filing for skull loss and date after discharge from the Marine Corps. They previously granted the service connection of 50% for skull loss with effective date of 5 March, 2005. In that decision they used under reasons and bases the same exact medical evidence provided in the earlier filing of 15 Nov 1976.

I got the big white envelope today, it said that a SOC was not necessary and that after thorough review their decision is:

Full Grant of all benefits sought on appeal.

They granted the 60% combined total compensation from 28 Nov 1976 to 25 March of 2005, then 80% to 18 Oct 2007, then 100% from 19 Oct 2007.

They explained there was not CUE since to have a CUE there first must have been an adjudication of the claim. They determined it was an unadjudicated claim that they failed to adjudicate.

So I started this long journey in March of 2005 at which time I was only getting 10% for post concussion residuals from the 1976 decision.

I tried using the VSO's AMVETS etc., but they snuffed me or condescended me and I soon realized that they were not savy as to the CFRs and how the whole process is supposed to work for success in winning your claim, in fact most VSO's were pure horses asses to me and kept telling me I didn't have a chance in hell.

Well, here it is 18 Nov, 2009 and it is finally all over with. Thanks to my long time membership on hadit, the internet VA websites, BVA decision, M21s, and other regs as the CFRs I am through and was 110% successful. So it was a long 4 yrs and eight months but all is well that ends well and what a relief finally.

To recap I ended up finally with 100% P&T with HB SMC and 60% compensation earlier effective date from 28 Nov 1976 to 5 March 2005 and that is in the 6 figures. Just last week I tried the AMVETS and told them of the pending SOC I was supposed to get and they told me to go represent myself and Who told me to file a CUE in the first place!!!!

I then was contemplating a lawyer yesterday and pay 15% of the grant.

So it ended up I represented myself pretty darn good for an old Vietnam Vet Marine.

So to all, don't be discouraged. If you have the evidence of record that supports a service connection condition, you will win!!!! It's just a matter of time.

Thanks Berta, Pete, Cowgirl, Vike17, Carlie, and John.

Edited by RockyA1911
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Rocky,

All I can say is,

Damn

Damn

Damn

Damn

Damn

Damn

This is GREAT - what a friggin shock - they FINALLY did something right.

WOW - WOW - WOW !

post-60-1258597956_thumb.jpg

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Congratulations! I am very, very happy for you ;-) ~Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW_ This is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"They explained there was not CUE since to have a CUE there first must have been an adjudication of the claim. They determined it was an unadjudicated claim that they failed to adjudicate."

Say what?

Double WOW- either way- they OWE YOU plenty- this is quite extraordinary news! I need to find all your posts Rocky- I will be able to learn from them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just goes to show you that hard work pays off and miracles to occur~!

Way to go with the win---

AkWidow

"Do one thing every day that scares you." Eleanor Roosevelt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just to remind members and to point out to

some of the newer members, to never give up and don't

let anything get your hopes down, when you know you have

a good and solid claim for veterans benefits.

Rocky started at Hadit in around October of 2005.

If you want you can go to the link below and research

some of the struggles he has had to overcome

Here's a link to Rocky's topic posts at Hadit.

carlie

http://www.hadit.com/forums/index.php?act=...mp;hl=&st=0

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use