Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Kidney Cancer

Rate this question


texal1

Question

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

None I can think of but the VA can only attempt to reduce a rating with medical evidence of substantial improvement in the condition.

The vet should swiftly appeal any proposed reduction (I think they only have 60 days to appeal)and gather evidence to prove them wrong.

Are you concerned about your rating? Did they VA award you P & T (Permanent and Total?)

EVen with a P & T rating they have tried to propose to reduce vets at 100% from time to time.

Since most disabilities get worse and not better with time-and the VA has no magic cures for any of them-I wouldn't worry about this unless you have received a letter proposing to reduce you.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VBM has a section of this subject. I believe if you are over 55 and have been 100% for at least 5 years the VA cannot just use one exam to reduce you. They have to consider the entire record and find very solid evidence you are better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A lot of the cancer conditions are rated 100 percent while the disease is active or treatment is ongoing. But if treatment works, you will usually be reduced down to zero or some other minimum.

It always amazes me. The vet fights to keep that 100 percent he was awarded, despite having JUST BEATEN CANCER. The VA isn't going to pay you forever because you had cancer at one time but you beat it.

This would be the rating schedule for kidney cancer:

7528 Malignant neoplasms of the genitourinary system 100

Note—Following the cessation of surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy or other therapeutic procedure, the rating of 100 percent shall continue with a mandatory VA examination at the expiration of six months. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination shall be subject to the provisions of §3.105(e) of this chapter. If there has been no local reoccurrence or metastasis, rate on residuals as voiding dysfunction or renal dysfunction, whichever is predominant.

So, 6 months after cessation of treatment (even if you've had it for five years), you'll be rated on residuals (usually renal function or urinary function, etc).

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James,

Its because the fight takes so much out of you physically, mentally and in a lot of our cases it ruins us financially. Cancer is the worst illness in my opinion a person can have. The treatments are the most expensive out there my chemo was more than 10k per month and I had to endure it for 1 year I almost lost my home and I am still digging out of that hole but you are right I am alive.

I could use the 100% I am still fighting with the VA for because I filled after I had finished chemo although my treating physicians never said I was in remission and test showed active . I value your contributions and I read every post any time I see your name but I thought your comments were a little insensitive to cancer survivors on this one unless you walked in our shoes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
James,

Its because the fight takes so much out of you physically, mentally and in a lot of our cases it ruins us financially. Cancer is the worst illness in my opinion a person can have. The treatments are the most expensive out there my chemo was more than 10k per month and I had to endure it for 1 year I almost lost my home and I am still digging out of that hole but you are right I am alive.

I could use the 100% I am still fighting with the VA for because I filled after I had finished chemo although my treating physicians never said I was in remission and test showed active . I value your contributions and I read every post any time I see your name but I thought your comments were a little insensitive to cancer survivors on this one unless you walked in our shoes

KW34, what sort of cancer was it? Were you treated for it at a VAMC? Many times I have had a claim for prostate cancer cross my desk, filed more than six months after they stopped treatment. I look for some way to grant an earlie effective date, and on the few occaisions that I have, it has usually had something to do with getting treatment at a VAMC and being able to consider some of the treatment as an "implied claim".

I didn't mean to sound insensitive. If the cancer is still active, then of course the 100 percent should be continued.

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use