Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Won Appeal... Sorta

Rate this question


jtg1966

Question

alright so i won my appeal...but the dro only sc'd me back to 1/09...back in may of 08 after i put in my nod...they sent me a SOC and VA form 9...well i've been homeless on and off for the last 20 years...and the SOC and VA form were returned as undeliverable...

however, i submitted information in jan 09 stating among other things that the VA had not acquired my clinical records from the service...

I wrote a letter to the secretary of the va in jan 09, and a letter to my senator and congressmen one in 0ct of 08 and one in jan 09...i got three letters (one answering the senate inquiry, one answering the congresstional inquiry, and one answering the letter to sec va) back from the director of the st petersburg VARO on feb 20 09 stating that the information that i submitted in jan 09 would be accepted as my va form 9 if i was in agreement...and that a representative from the RO had spoken to me on jan 26 and that i agreed to continue with the appeal and that i elected a bva travel board hearing...

the dro has interpreted the information filed in jan 09 as a request to reopen my case...what about the three letters from the director of the RO stating that i was in appeal? I spoke with my POA and they agree that the dro is wrong with his effective date...and that they tried to get him to assign an appropriate effective date...but that he won't budge...they say that the only way to get an appropriate effective date is to nod the decsion and appeal again....WTF?

the three letters are identical execept for the salutation...

I attached one of the letters...

thanks in advance for the wisdom of this forum---john

appeals3.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

berta, i do not have documentation for them saying that the only way i can get a proper award date is through appeal...the american legion is playing cya too...the poa verbally told me that nod and appeal was the only way to get the proper award date...

at times over the years i've had different poa's and frankly...they haven't done much for me...i can quote the cfr's nearly by rote and bva and cavc case law...and they don't get it...amvets, dav, american legion...seems like i know more than them...i beat the VA to death over getting this initial rating...

i just got a lawyer like 3 days before the dro decided the case...the lawyer isn't on record as my representative yet...it takes the st pete ro up to 6 weeks to switch the poa...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carlie as of last week i was 20% sc...with the 50% bipolar it's now 60%...i updated it...i've gotten the back pay 8041.00...and this month's 60% @ $974.00...but i haven't gotten the award letter yet...i got the back pay on thursday... and the monthly friday actually....but it was split...243 and 731...

berta, my VARO is St. petersburg, fl...

jtg,

Spend the money wisely - lump sums do not come very often.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Put the retro in the bank. You may need more medical reports in the future and they cost money. A cash cushion can give you the time you need for an IU claim. If you are not working then an IU claim is in order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alright so i won my appeal...but the dro only sc'd me back to 1/09...back in may of 08 after i put in my nod...they sent me a SOC and VA form 9...well i've been homeless on and off for the last 20 years...and the SOC and VA form were returned as undeliverable...

however, i submitted information in jan 09 stating among other things that the VA had not acquired my clinical records from the service...

I wrote a letter to the secretary of the va in jan 09, and a letter to my senator and congressmen one in 0ct of 08 and one in jan 09...i got three letters (one answering the senate inquiry, one answering the congresstional inquiry, and one answering the letter to sec va) back from the director of the st petersburg VARO on feb 20 09 stating that the information that i submitted in jan 09 would be accepted as my va form 9 if i was in agreement...and that a representative from the RO had spoken to me on jan 26 and that i agreed to continue with the appeal and that i elected a bva travel board hearing...

the dro has interpreted the information filed in jan 09 as a request to reopen my case...what about the three letters from the director of the RO stating that i was in appeal? I spoke with my POA and they agree that the dro is wrong with his effective date...and that they tried to get him to assign an appropriate effective date...but that he won't budge...they say that the only way to get an appropriate effective date is to nod the decsion and appeal again....WTF?

the three letters are identical execept for the salutation...

I attached one of the letters...

thanks in advance for the wisdom of this forum---john

Is it even legally possible to "reopen" an existing claim already on appeal with new evidence? Can the VA just ignore a remand pursuant to an appeal due to the "reopening" and ignore the earlier effective date of the filing of the original claim this way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use