Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mt Pleasant Man Gets Nine Indictments

Rate this question


carlie

Question

http://www.easttexasdailynews.com/?c=125&a=19831

Mt Pleasant Man Gets Nine Indictments

Mt Pleasant’s Jim Bob Shipp’s nine-count federal indictment says he received over $800,000. Shipp, 60, allegedly defrauded Veteran’s Administration out of benefits for at least 22 years. He did so by allegedly pretending to be severely vision impaired. Shipp is accused of defrauding the VA from Oct. 25, 1974 to Dec. 1, 2009. The indictment also accuses him of being in possession of a gun despite a felony conviction for rape.

http://www.dailytribune.net/articles/2010/02/03/news/03.txt

Mount Pleasant man charged with health care fraud

Wednesday, February 3, 2010 11:38 AM CST

TYLER, TX - U.S. Attorney John M. Bales announced Wednesday that indictments were returned on Feb. 2, 2010, charging individuals with federal crimes in the Eastern District of Texas.

Jim Bob Shipp, 60, of Mount Pleasant, was indicted and charged with health care fraud; false statement relating to health care matters; felon in possession of a firearm; and false statement during the purchase of a firearm.

If convicted, Shipp faces up to 10 years in federal prison for each of the health care and firearms charges and up to five years for the false statement during the purchase of a firearms charge.

According to the indictment, from March 1987 to December 2009, Shipp is alleged to have committed health care fraud and made false statements in relation to obtaining health care services from the Veterans Disability Program.

It is alleged that Shipp falsely represented to doctors that he had extreme loss of vision in both eyes. As a result of these false claims, the Veterans' Affairs Disability Compensation Program awarded the Defendant special monthly compensation during the time period alleged. Also, the indictment alleges that on Sep. 11, 2006, in Titus County, Shipp possessed a firearm after having been previously convicted of a felony.

The Indictment also alleges that on Feb. 7, 2006, in Titus County, Shipp attempted to purchase a firearm from a licensed dealer, during which time, Shipp made false statements by representing that he had not been convicted of a felony or a crime which would prohibit him from legally purchasing a firearm.

This case is being investigated by the Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Assistant United States Attorney Denise O. Simpson is prosecuting the case.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Funny how someone could get away with that when the VA in Dallas uses a machine to determine the extent of your vision loss and calculates the correct prescription.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

This guy should go to work for the VA. Instead of being prosecuted for fraud, he would be given an executive position with bonuses. The VAOIG rarely prosecutes its own employees..only Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
Funny how someone could get away with that when the VA in Dallas uses a machine to determine the extent of your vision loss and calculates the correct prescription.

The news article said he allegedly defrauded the VA from March, 1987. Did they even have such machines back then? Stories like this just make it more difficult for legitimate VA claims to be processed. So much for the honor system idea. The stark reality of what is really going on in the world is a sad story, all the way around... There is certainly nothing pleasant about this story.

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

regardless of the felony I don't think people that are so severely sight impaired that they get 100% VA compensation should even think about buying a gun legally or illegally my step father was blind the safest place when he had his shotgun was to be right in front of him and be weallly weallly quiet.......

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
regardless of the felony I don't think people that are so severely sight impaired that they get 100% VA compensation should even think about buying a gun legally or illegally my step father was blind the safest place when he had his shotgun was to be right in front of him and be weallly weallly quiet.......

One of the news articles mentioned SMC. The other news story said he received over $800, 000 over 22years. That has to be a typo???? Amazing, if true ...

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use