Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nehmer Retroactive Date?

Rate this question


THOMAS89031

Question

ANYONE KNOW WHAT DATE IS USED FOR RETROACTIVE PURPOSES?

SUCH AS: IN COUNTRY DATES; DATE OF DISCHARGE, OR DATE OF NEHMER DECISION

THANKS

THOMAS89031

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

This is an old post and I regret I missed it-

in this post there is link to NVLSP and the explanation of Nehmer and the EEDS for AO claims.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If a Vietnam vet died of IHD what would the effective date be for a spouse filing now for the first time for DIC?

There must be a large number of vets who have died from heart disease in the last 40 odd years. Their spouses got nothing if they were not already SC'ed 100% for ten years or died from other SC condition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two weeks ago the VA contacted me and told me that my records were in Muskogee Oklahoma because I was included in the Nehmer Group. I asked them what date would the VA use to determine a retro date according to Nehmer. I had flied a claim for Ischemic Heart Disease on November 8, 2005. I recieved a VA letter denying my claim on May 6, 2006. I was told that my effective date would definitely be the DATE I FILED, NOT THE DATE I WAS DENIED so my claim would surely be going back to November 8, 2005. I called back a little latter and they confirmed to me again that the date WOULD BE November 8, 2005. If you records are at the Nehmer Group in Muskogee OK, you are being considered for retro according to Nehmer. Based on this, Nehmer does apply to all who have had a claim for one of the "New Presumptive" denied in the past. I hope this information to my fellow Vietnam Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If a Vietnam vet died of IHD what would the effective date be for a spouse filing now for the first time for DIC?

There must be a large number of vets who have died from heart disease in the last 40 odd years. Their spouses got nothing if they were not already SC'ed 100% for ten years or died from other SC condition.

 From VA's Nehmer Training Guide

The effective date for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation(DIC) claims must be one of the following dates:

 

·      The date VA received the claim, or

·      The first day of the month of the Veteran’sdeath, if filed within one year from the date of the Veteran’s death

 

NOTE:  If the class member’s claim for DIC for thedeath was either pending before VA on May 3, 1989, or was received by VAbetween that date and the effective date of the statute or regulationestablishing a presumption of service connection for the covered herbicidedisease that caused death, the effective date of the award will be the later ofthe date such claim was received by VA or the death occurred (38 C.F.R. §3.816(d)(2)). 

 

NOTE: 38 U.S.C. § 5110(g) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.114(a) do not apply to Nehmerclaims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

So if the vet died 20 years ago from IHD the widow only gets paid from the time she files the claim. You know this is basically unfair. The VA and the government know the vet died from AO exposure. If the widow never filed she would not get a dime. This should be automatic back to the day of death from service connected cause. This is the VA playing a dirty game with spouses which is called "how do we legally screw this spouse of a "fallen hero" out of DIC. The country holds the dead vet up as a hero on the one hand and screws the spouse on the other. This is just like all AO claims since the government knows darn well the exposure caused the disease. The AO was a ticking time bomb inside the vet but you only get compensated when the bomb explodes. Same with PTSD and all the rest of delayed action disease bombs caused by war. Did the vet not have PTSD until he filed for it? I know the law, but it is unfair and a disgrace to those who sacrifice. There is the law and there is justice. They are at opposite ends of the universe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use