Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Streamlining Claims Process

Rate this question


BMCS00

Question

It's easy enough to complain about how long it takes to get what seems to be a simple claim through the process in a timely fashion. We all know complaining does little good unless the right person hears it.

Some of you have worked as a VSR or for the VA in some other capacity in your past, most of us sit around and wait for our claims to be finished to our satisfaction.

How about post here some ways to improve the process. I think it takes too long between Comp & Pen exam to rating decision, but I don't know or understand the process in between. I think a timeline should be established for a new claim, from the day it arrives at the VBA to the day a rating decision is made. How long should it take for each step of the process? How many steps to the process are there? Are we really just searching for the holy grail in the world of disability claims processing?

I would like to foster some discussion here, and see what we can come up with ... what do you say?

Jim

Life is good! B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I've never seen a VCAA letter.

I used a highlighter and sticky-notes to show the RO where the mistakes were made.

Then they screwed-up and included their internal memos in with the records that I had requested.

From one RO employee to the next they had written, deny this Vets claim, he only knows how to mark up the SSOC with a highlighter and who told this guy to use notes?

That was only one of several different internal denial statements that I was obviously not supposed to see.

Their internal notes were instrumental in helping me to land a pro-bono lawyer in 2000.

Their internal memos also gave me the attitude which paved the way to fighting the jerks until the day that I die or they do.

Except for a few notable exceptions, the people who process our claims think of us as something that got stuck on their shoe while walking through a cow pasture.

We are fraudulent bums and drug seekers until proven differently.

They do not see us as the reason that they have a job.

They see us as the reason that the advancement in their occupation gets put on hold.

They love it when a disabled vet stops fighting for his rights and earned benefits.

That's the same as settling a claim and reducing the backlog without using any of the governments resources, in their sociopathic little minds.

IMO,

The government's resources are being severely wasted by VA employees who pad the payroll by requiring more and more VA employees to handle/work our mishandled and continuing claims.

I would love to see somebody/anybody prove me wrong.

Just my opinion based upon facts.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we request a copy of our C-file, who goes thru and removes all the internal memo's? What happens to them? I have often wondered about this. I've heard they are doing away with paper memo's. Now I wonder if they post the memo's in their computer? You bet they have some type side bar to reference your file. (That is not part of your C-file but referenced to it when it is worked!). I would love to see what is stuck to my file. Probably the same stuff as is on the bottom of their shoe's. *In the earlier days of my second appeal, I had a not too friendly conversation with a VA gent on the toll free line. I kept my cool until he ran out of answers and tried to bullsh-t me. Then he got nasty, I fired it right back. My appeal that was originally in Cleveland VARO--for some reason----ended up in VARO Huntington, West (by God) Virginia. Amazing, with another Vet's name and C-file number all mixed with in my appeals file. So now we had two veteran's appeals really screwed up. I won my appeal after some 7-years. The problem is they (VA) are the screwer's and we are the screweeeeees!! You are right John999, we win a claim by evidence, but believe me it is more than the benefit of the doubt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used a highlighter and sticky-notes to show the RO where the mistakes were made.

Then they screwed-up and included their internal memos in with the records that I had requested.

From one RO employee to the next they had written, deny this Vets claim, he only knows how to mark up the SSOC with a highlighter and who told this guy to use notes?

Sledge, thank you for posting this. I'm having a darker day, and wasn't feeling up to making the calls I need to make, or writing up the statement I'm supposed to be doing. Your post has lit a fire in my heart and I'm grabbing the phone right now.

Thanks for the inspiration, just when I needed some!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

you don't want to win by benefit of doubt. You want there to be no doubt. You just want to surround and crush them with evidence. We do a pincher movement and cut off and surround the VARO and then move in the big evidence guns and blast away. Arguments often fail. Overkill is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"When we request a copy of our C-file, who goes thru and removes all the internal memo's? What happens to them?"

In my case, I did not even suspect that the RO jerks were capable of such biased and illegal activities.

Obviously, the person who should have cleaned up my file, before the process of copying, was gone that day.

I do not have a clue as to where that stuff goes when they pull it out.

They told one another to deny my claims because I had not shown up for my hearing.

Later they discovered that the hearing was NEVER SCHEDULED and was NEVER RESCHEDULED.

They also privately said to deny my claims because I had not shown up for a C&P. They later discovered that the exam had been canceled by the examining facility, in a letter to me, and NEVER RESCHEDULED.

They also said to deny my claims because I had missed my requested C&P.

Later they discovered that I had shown up but the examiner had been told to examine me on another date.

And the exam was NEVER RESCHEDULED.

I forgot to throw away the written notices, those one page notices, that the jerks had sent to me and I'm sure my lawyer chuckled about it for 3 days.

Their latest trick was to write up 2 more C&P exams that I never knew about and could not have attended. The evidence from these 2 exams is not as negative as it could have been but, once again, my lawyer will get a good laugh outa their BS.

In their latest stuff they are acknowledging some evidence from the late 80's and early 90's, medical evidence that they have never implied using before now.

Stuff that I sent in to support my contentions in place of their C&P's that NEVER HAPPENED.

They've had some of that evidence for 21 years and would have had to admit that it was received in order to rebut it.

Well, I've been saying for years that the claims process was just fine as long as the VA jerks would actually follow their own rules.

They don't need to reinvent the process because they have yet to experience the adjudication process as it was originally mandated by congress.

I believe we should see how it works 'without the bonus system' before trying to fix it.

If a bonus system has to exist I believe that the bonuses should be determined by the clients of the system, not the administrators of the system.

But everybody knows how crazy sledge is.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use