ptsd To Prove Your Case Under Usc

[Guest elizabeth]

I would like to state under usc-38 evidence can be applied from any one even your wife stating they knew of your issue as state no medical is accepted so just state knew of foot problem in 1950 or whate date applies-new law all letters must be notarized under usc va must accept this as evident also uss wasp sinking the hobson april 26 1952 can apply for 100% as this fact is listed as worst accident in no war i know this as a fact because my husband was on the wasp in 52 and he is 100%ptsd you do not have prove to va anything your proof will always be there in uss waso history every crew memenber should apply I would also like to state try to get your va fax number fax will get there same day and you;ll have proof of va receving it-also withdraw from any service origation they work for va no you on form 9 always cross out send to bva -write not sure a this time always always keed you claim at va level bva will lock you in for years with usc title 38 we can fight va under 38 i hope i have helped in some way check also usc title 38 1131 and 1110 these are very good to support your claim Elizabeth

[10thFO]

Elizabeth,

Good info, hey I agree to an extent on the SO's. I know there are some good ones, unfortunately those are the ones that get swamped. I know ever vet at my Vet Outreach is using the same one. Unfortun ately he's retiring soon.

I wrote a letter yesterday to my representatives about the bill to allow Vets to use lawyers from the beginning in claims. Told them that Service Organizations located on the same floor next door to the Regional Offices (at least they are in Roanoke, Virginia) is like the fox staying in the henhouse, and even if nothing were going on wrong, it does give the appearance, with all the problems people have with claims taking over a year now, of the possibility of collusion or something going on. It may only be peoples perception, but your perception is your reality.

I know the Serv. Orgs. do represent us in front of the gov't, but there insistence on remaining separate from the other organizations does us no good. We need one consolidated group.

[Guest DON20906]

VSOs are co-located at ROs because the law requires VA to give them office space where available. Moving them out would be a disaster for veterans because that's where the c-files are.

Good luck getting The American Legion to merge with DAV.

:(

[10thFO]

Don, didn't know that but that makes sense. I've noticed in Roanoke VARO that some other rooms are opening up on that floor. I would imagine one of the drawbacks of vets going into the RO's to see the guys face to face is that fact that you have to go through security. Hell if I worked there though I would be complaining they didn't have enough.

As for the Service Organizations? Yeah, its parallel would be trying to get the Army, Marine Corps to get along. :(

[Guest DON20906]

Security at the ROs is an issue. I went to the quarterly meeting of VSOs and the Board of Veterans Appeals last week. There was an incident in St. Pete where a veteran was seeing an SO and the vet was told that the Veterans Law Judge who had decided against him was there doing travel board hearings. Apparently the guy went postal and tried to find the VLJ and whoop on him/her. Turns out it wasn't even the right VLJ, just one with the same last name. VSOs were asked to advise VSCMs when they think a veteran is likely to be violent, abusive, etc., so that security can be posted. I've been personally threatened by veterans I was representing at the BVA, including one 83 year old dude who said he was coming to DC to shoot me over his 1151 claim.

Don, didn't know that but that makes sense. I've noticed in Roanoke VARO that some other rooms are opening up on that floor. I would imagine one of the drawbacks of vets going into the RO's to see the guys face to face is that fact that you have to go through security. Hell if I worked there though I would be complaining they didn't have enough.

As for the Service Organizations? Yeah, its parallel would be trying to get the Army, Marine Corps to get along. :(

[Guest DON20906]

BTW, DAV exists because they split off from TAL in 1921, over all the non-veteran related stuff that TAL was getting involved in. Weighing in on national security, politics, etc. DAV just wanted to serve veterans.

As for the Service Organizations? Yeah, its parallel would be trying to get the Army, Marine Corps to get along. :(

[Guest DON20906]

This is bad information. Feel free to point me to the "new law."

new law all letters must be notarized under usc va must accept this as evident

I am aware of no law or reg that requires notary service to lay, buddy or other secondary evidence sources.

VA has always accepted secondary evidence as is. Assigning a notary seal would add absolutely no extra weight.