Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Over 25 Years Of Limping, But Bad Knee Not Sc'd

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

I have a lot of gripes with the VA decision I got today, but I can only deal with one at a time. I'm going to file a NOD, that's one thing I do know for sure.

A training accident left me with an injured left foot. I was discharged because of it, the VA later gave me 10% for it, calling it Left Foot - Chronic Residual Pain. That was in 1985.

Last year I filed a claim, and one of the things I listed was to add my right knee as a secondary issue, due to the many years of limping. During the C&P, the evaluator asked if I'd ever fallen. I said yes, my knee had given out and I'd fallen down some stairs. She stated in the report that I had fallen down the stairs and injured my knee. I filed a request to amend the record, and they supposedly approved it.

The Decision Letter refers to that original C&P statement, and also that the arthritis in my right knee is also due to normal aging (funny how only my right knee is aging...)

I'd had an IME scheduled earlier this spring, but one of the partners in the practice died and they canceled my appointment. I'm going to call tomorrow and see if I can get in.

Can anyone please point me in the direction of VA medical precedents that would apply, namely years of antalgia resulting in joint problems on the opposite side? I know I can search somewhere, but I'm not sure how best to phrase the keywords.

Thanks for any help. I'm pretty upset, so I'm sorry if I'm not being very clear or if I'm being too wordy..

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hegey:

I am grateful for VA I really am but only because they finally have become more Vet Friendly to me. Partly cause I am civil and courteous and I thank people who help me or are at least friendly.

You are at the stage where anger is a good thing cause it motivates you to work to get your earned benefits. I agree with every post in this thread.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The IME is the thing to catch the conscience of the king. The king being the VA. Without my IME/IMO's I would be still at 30% instead of IU. A good IME/IMO can change a denial into a grant better than all the talk in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie, thanks :)

I didn't really think the may/may not would fly, but you know how it is when you first get that news and you're feeling scattered and startled and squashed. Thanks for stopping me from chasing a wild goose!

I called this morning and have scheduled an IME for next month (they were waiting to hear from me). My Vet guy advised me to file a NOD so that I would shift into Appeal mode, then I'd have more time to gather more evidence. It doesn't bother me too much to know that it will be another long stretch of time, I know they're swamped and I think it's really my fault for not being better prepared.

I'm seeing my podiatrist next week and will get a letter that clearly states ALL my foot problems and that they're more than likely due to my military injury.

hedgey,

I know you know the time clock for filing a NOD is within one year of the Rating Decision.

There is also usually a lot of discussion regarding that if you can get really good additional

medical evidence and submit it with a request for reconsideration that might be quicker,

but the NOD clock is still ticking and you should try to never miss that.

Maybe you should broach this possibility with your "vet guy".

Just more food for thought.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use