Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Anxiety Secondary To Tinnitus

Rate this question


Thc4me

Question

Hello - New to this site and dealing with the VA upgrade process. I was medically retired for profound hearing loss from USAF after 9yrs 10Mths service, I was retired at 60%. Applied to VA and was rated 10% for hearing loss, appealed and tinnitus was added as SC, still overall rating of 10%. I've been treated by VA at mental health clinic and been prescribed Alprazolam for anxiety for over 13yrs because of the difficulties I experienced sleeping and coping with the steady irritation of tinnitus. I have gotten my VA records and all is reflected as described. I assumed since I was given my medication by the VA for treatment the secondary symptoms of anxiety it was service connected. I've never paid for my prescriptions, but have been billed. I always took the bill to my VA mental health Psyc and inquired why I was being billed since this was resultant to my Tinnitus, the Dr always agreed and made a phone call and the bills were taken care of. I've never paid for a script. I now feel the problems are worsening and having depression and other issues. I went to a VSO at VA Hospital and submitted a formal request to have anxiety added to SC, and he told me I would be denied because there is no nexus to tinnitus. I showed him my VA med records but he still feels I'll be disapproved? I don't understand this. I never made a formal request to have anxiety added because treatment and meds were supplied free, and any monetary increase in VA rating would be offset in my Military Retirement. I'm now worried about my job and family along with other issues and feel having anxiety added would be just and beneficial. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. I have health insurance currently and can obtain treatment outside VA but feel my VA records and continual treatment and medication should be sufficient. I have scheduled an appointment with the VA DR who has been providing my treatment, and hope he will make a direct statement of secondary connection, VSO says the medical staff are trained to provide treatment, but will not directly link a secondary symptom. Is this VSO correct? Any opinions? Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Applied to VA and was rated 10% for hearing loss, appealed and tinnitus was added as SC, still overall rating of 10%. I've been treated by VA at mental health.

I have scheduled an appointment with the VA DR who has been providing my treatment, and hope he will make a direct statement of secondary connection, VSO says the medical staff are trained to provide treatment, but will not directly link a secondary symptom. Is this VSO correct? Any opinions? Thanks

Thc4me,

Welcome to Hadit

1) I feel your SC'd hearing loss and tinnitus should be rated separately at 10 % each total 20 %.

2) If a doctor is willing to write an opinion for you, stating your Anxiety is secondary to your Tinnitus

the doctor needs to be a Mental Health doctor. The MH doc will also need to support their opinion

with full medical rationale.

3) If you have a good relationship with your MH doctor then I say the VSO is full of it and would speak with

my MH provider about writing an opinion for me.

jmho.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use