Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Got My C&p Results. Looking For Opinion

Rate this question


JHawks

Question

I am already SC for malunion of my tib-fib with arthritis for my left ankle. I wear a prescribed brace on it and walk with a cane. Here is what was said in my C&P exam of June 10th. I will skip all the generic stuff.

Impression:

1. Right Knee Chondromalacia patellae - 5/5 motor strength / extension to 10 degrees with pain / flexation 125. Knee swells, locks, buckles, pops and grinds.-

2. Left Knee Chomdromalacia patellae - 5/5 motor strength / extension to 15 degrees with pain / flexation 115. Knee swells, locks, buckles, pops and grinds.

3. Right Ankle Achliiles tendonitis, calcaneal spur and planter faciitis. 5/5 motor strength / Dorsiflexion 0-20, planter flexation 0-25 with inversion, eversion pain on all ranges of motion.

4. Left Ankle Bimalleolar fracture with distal tibial deformity and cancaneal spur and posterior tibial nerve neuritis. 4+/5 motor strength / Dorsiflexion 0-10 / planter flexation 0-15 with essentially no inversion or eversion.It is further my (C&P Dr.) impression that problems 1, 2 and 3 are all more likely than not secondary to problem #4 considering that he has been ambulating with a limp and a cane and leg length discrepancy for many years.

What could I possibly expect from all of this? I am a complete novice in medical blah blah. Any off the cuff opinion would be helpful and appreciated.

Edited by JHawks

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Did the doctor link this to your established SC disability?

This info would help rate the disabilities but what did he say as to the inservcice nexus or cause of these disabilities?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all he wrote in the C&P was the following:

It is further my (C&P Dr.) impression that problems 1, 2 and 3 are all more likely than not secondary to problem #4 considering that he has been ambulating with a limp and a cane and leg length discrepancy for many years.

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

He's already SC'd for his left ankle, Berta. So, if the rater is awake then just maybe this will fly. Maybe.

1. 10%

2. 10%

3. 20%

4. Maybe 0%, if they consider this the same as what he is already rated for (don't know what percentage he is now getting for the lft ankle), maybe an increase, if so, no more than 10% above what he has now.

But, then, heck, take that OPINION and a $5.00 bill and buy a Starbucks.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I forgot to include I am currently rated 30% for my SC left ankle, 2 scars 10% each. VA Math combined 40%.

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the VA will SC the first three conditions as secondary to number 4. No idea about percentages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't have your file in front of me, so I'm having to make a wild-ass-guess based on certain assumptions.

Assuming the following...

You are already service connected for DC 5262 malunion of tibia and fibula on your left leg evaluated at 30 percent for marked knee or ankle disability. This is probably the left ankle bimalleolar fracture with distal tibai deformity. This is what makes your left leg shorter than your right. If this requires a brace (as opposed to a knee brace), then that satisfies the criteria for a 40 percent.

Are you sure that you're not 40 percent for the malunion of tibia and fibula, and 0 percent for the scars? In my experience, scars are rarely ever compensable. They generally have to painful, unstable, disfiguring, or actually limit the motion of an arm or leg or something before they become compensable.

In any case, due to the Amputation Rule 38 CFR 4.68, 40 percent is the maximum you can get for ALL conditions, no matter what, that are located below the knee. This makes sense, because a below the knee amputation is 40 percent. So, we can probably ignore whether it's 30 and two 10s, or a 40 and two 0s.

Both knees have limitation of motion secondary to the bimalleolar fracture, according to the doctor. Presto, they are now service connected on a secondary basis. What would the likely evaluation be? Because there is some limitation of motion in each knee, there's going to be at least 10 percent for each knee. But look at DC 5261. If extension of the left knee is limited to 15 degrees (normal is 0 degrees, which is a straight leg) it warrants a 20 percent. Also, the right ankle gets 10 percent for limited motion.

So, all up, we have 20 percent for the left knee due to extension being limited to 15 degrees, 40 degrees for what's below the knee, 10 percent for the right ankle, and 10 percent for the right knee. 40-20-10-10 should be about 60 percent, ignoring bilateral factors.

Fun fact: since all of the conditions share a common etiology/body system, they count as a single 60 percent disability, which meets the baseline criteria for individual unemployability. A doctor would still have to opine upon whether it actually stops you from working.

Edited by JamesBreckenridge

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use