Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denied

Rate this question


RSG

Question

Ok,

for the second time I was denied IU again and told to take my claim to the BVA...Why does the VA keep doing this. I haven't been able to work since 2001 and was retired for the same medical issues by SSD..

I can't understand this.......Tnx

RSG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

RSG sometimes it is nothing wrong with your file the RO that you are dealing with may not want to be seen as "giving away the candy store" and it may require you to appeal to the BVA level to get the award granted I kept my heart problem claims local with the help of the fine people here at Hadit for more than 5 years before I got a lawyer involved and we took it to the BVA after the RO again denied the lawyers first attempt to get the mess straight less than 6 months later we were given a BVA hearing and the Judge granted my claim secondary to PTSD which all of the SO's had told me could never be done AL, DAV, even the PVA all told me that I could not get it granted secondary to PTSD well they were wrong the people here were right yes taking it to BVA sounds drastic but sometimes you just have to do it

you might want to consider getting a lawyer they get paid 20% of whatever your back pay will be but wouldn't you rather have 80% of an award rather than a 100% of a denial? Just make sure you get one that does KNOW VA rules and regs NOVA has some great layers that is what they specialize in veterans law

I was able to live pretty decent on SSD and 50% VA until they finally saw the "light" and was forced by BVA to service connect my CAD and hypertension but being 100% SMC S and SSD is a LOT better keep fighting you will get it

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I understand that...The biggest issue is the VA has been screwing me for 40 years.....And I will not let that slide.....

I am at a disadvantage here. Berta seems to have a good handle on your claim and I am not sure what I could add at this point.

You are in very good hands!

I will say that I find it a shame that you are going to have to go the BVA route to get approved for something that Berta feels is a virtual slam dunk approval. The only good thing other than you finally getting approved coming out of this is the fact your retro will be quite substantial when you do get approved!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RSG can you cover the personal stuff (C file # etc) and scan this and attach it here-

we only need to see the Evidence list and their reasons and bases.

If we can get a few pairs of eyes on this decision we can figure out what is wrong with the decision and the next step.

Stillhere made an excellent point we dont discuss much-

The wording of a claim can often set up a denial.

It took me about 2 weeks of re writes and editing for my 2003 AO death claim.

I had to state the claim very carefully.It was to bring up an additional misdiagnosis of my husband but I could not claim it under 1151 or FTCA.It was awarded a few months ago.

I have an IHD claim and the same thing is happening-I have written the claim 4 times but it still isnt stated right.

The IHD was never diagnosed and rated by the VA at all but the award clearly states it contributed to my husband's death.

Also this morning I posted here a BVA link -the veteran had claimed Gulf War Syndrome. There is no legal basis for a Gulf WAr Syndrome claim as there is no such disability so the BVA denied the claim.

It was definitely a case of the veteran not writing the claim out properly to fulfill the GWV claim criteria of Qualifying chronic disability.

We need to see how the VA handled this:

I even have the IMO's from VA doctors.

Have they misinterpreted the claim or have they chosen to ignore the good stuff?

It would help if you can attach a scan of this decision -we could help you more and this would help others here too.

It is even possible the VA didnt even attempt to get your SSA records at all.If they didn't use them as evidence.

Been there done that on that one-and I corrected that problem for my husband's PTSD claim by raising Hell.

The authorization form he signed for them to get his SSA records was in his C file but they claimed the SSA refused to release what they had. It was a lie. After I made a call to SSA main office,the SSA records were sent to the VA right away.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that. I already had the BVA agree with me and they said in the BVA decison that they have been wrong about denying me since 1969.

THe VA has been wrong in denying me for the past 40 years....I am so pissed about this I can't even see straight...I will not give up until this lying, adversarial,

bunch of jerks live up to their responsibilities......

RSG sometimes it is nothing wrong with your file the RO that you are dealing with may not want to be seen as "giving away the candy store" and it may require you to appeal to the BVA level to get the award granted I kept my heart problem claims local with the help of the fine people here at Hadit for more than 5 years before I got a lawyer involved and we took it to the BVA after the RO again denied the lawyers first attempt to get the mess straight less than 6 months later we were given a BVA hearing and the Judge granted my claim secondary to PTSD which all of the SO's had told me could never be done AL, DAV, even the PVA all told me that I could not get it granted secondary to PTSD well they were wrong the people here were right yes taking it to BVA sounds drastic but sometimes you just have to do it

you might want to consider getting a lawyer they get paid 20% of whatever your back pay will be but wouldn't you rather have 80% of an award rather than a 100% of a denial? Just make sure you get one that does KNOW VA rules and regs NOVA has some great layers that is what they specialize in veterans law

I was able to live pretty decent on SSD and 50% VA until they finally saw the "light" and was forced by BVA to service connect my CAD and hypertension but being 100% SMC S and SSD is a LOT better keep fighting you will get it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will scan the decision and email it to you if that is ok.....

RSG can you cover the personal stuff (C file # etc) and scan this and attach it here-

we only need to see the Evidence list and their reasons and bases.

If we can get a few pairs of eyes on this decision we can figure out what is wrong with the decision and the next step.

Stillhere made an excellent point we dont discuss much-

The wording of a claim can often set up a denial.

It took me about 2 weeks of re writes and editing for my 2003 AO death claim.

I had to state the claim very carefully.It was to bring up an additional misdiagnosis of my husband but I could not claim it under 1151 or FTCA.It was awarded a few months ago.

I have an IHD claim and the same thing is happening-I have written the claim 4 times but it still isnt stated right.

The IHD was never diagnosed and rated by the VA at all but the award clearly states it contributed to my husband's death.

Also this morning I posted here a BVA link -the veteran had claimed Gulf War Syndrome. There is no legal basis for a Gulf WAr Syndrome claim as there is no such disability so the BVA denied the claim.

It was definitely a case of the veteran not writing the claim out properly to fulfill the GWV claim criteria of Qualifying chronic disability.

We need to see how the VA handled this:

I even have the IMO's from VA doctors.

Have they misinterpreted the claim or have they chosen to ignore the good stuff?

It would help if you can attach a scan of this decision -we could help you more and this would help others here too.

It is even possible the VA didnt even attempt to get your SSA records at all.If they didn't use them as evidence.

Been there done that on that one-and I corrected that problem for my husband's PTSD claim by raising Hell.

The authorization form he signed for them to get his SSA records was in his C file but they claimed the SSA refused to release what they had. It was a lie. After I made a call to SSA main office,the SSA records were sent to the VA right away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

RSG

Did you have a personal hearing with the VA about the IU issue. I had the same problem when I was rated 70% and had SSD and was denied IU. In my situation the VA said my NSC issues were the real reason I was unemployable. This was pure fiction. I would ask for a personal hearing and you might be able to clear this up without a 3 year trip to the BVA. Get your significant other to go with you to be your advocate. If you have SSD for the same condition as your 70% and the VA is denying you I would like to see the reasons for the denial. If they continue to deny after a personal hearing I would do as TestVet has said and hire a lawyer. You should have a lawyer for your CUE I think also since you have some cognitive problems. Can you post reasons and basis for the denial so we can all get a look?

Something is not right and it could be some miserable detail the VA is using to deny your claim which a talk to a human at the VA could clear up in 5 minutes. You should not have to go to the BVA on such a claim where the evidence is so clear and 4.16A is met. I don't know what excuse the VA is using to deny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use