Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Supervisor Threatens Me

Rate this question


Cruinthe

Question

So I pass out cards and generally BS with my fellow veterans when I am in the VARO waiting area. I spoke to one young man about his case. After the conversation, a VA supervisor walked up to him and loudly warned him to not listen to my advice, and not to talk to me at all.

Fast forward to today, I went in to the VARO to clarify an issue about my DRO hearing. I asked the same VA supervisor about the conversation he had with the young man, and I was warned again that I may not speak with anyone while waiting at the VARO.

Anyone have any feedback on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I appreciate the feedback I am getting here. This restores my waning faith in veterans and humanity in general.

Now, you guys tell me what you think of this little tidbit.

I am helping a veteran transfer his file. So we go into the Roanoke VARO and ask to speak to a VA rep (we did not ask for DAV or VFW, or AL, but VA employee). So out comes this short little girl wearing a dark green shirt. She asks to my buddy, "are you Norman?" and he replies yes. She says to follow her, I get up and go with him.

As soon as we are in the hallway, this person turns and says to me "why are you?" and I reply "I am with Norm" and she replies "yeah well, why?" and I explain I am helping Norman with his VA claim and that I am certified by the NVLSP as a veterans advocate. Then Norman figures out that this chick is DAV, and he says "I canceled my POA with DAV" and this girl says...get this..."YEAH, I KNOW YOU DID". And me and Norm are like, WTF?! Over?

So she says to Norm "well I cant talk to you" and she heads back into the lobby area. When we get to the lobby, she stops, get RIGHT in my face, jabs a finger in my chest and ORDERS ME "you dont talk to anyone in this area, you dont talk to HIM, you dont talk to HIM, and you dont talk to HIM" as she points to 3 veterans sitting in the lobby, then she adds "they belong to ME!" and she turns about and walks into the RO office area.

Needless to say, Norman was stunned, I just sat there and smiled because I am totally used to this sort of behavior by the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would bring out the devil in me.

Does anyone has access to a short-range audio transmitter?

HEH-HEH

I would find a media person who wants to break a National Story.

Allow the media person to know, through a third party, when you are scheduled to return for your next appointment. He can record everything that transpires between you and anyone else while you are calmly awaiting your turn to see the doctor.

It's called Freedom Of Speech and

Freedom of the Press.

As long as you have not been arrested and confined you have the right to talk with anyone you want to.

If a media person manages to quietly sit close to you and record something,

that's between the VA and the National News because you were not knowingly involved in whatever the media girl happened to be doing.

Of course he, the media person, might want to follow several different veterans as they go through their VA appointment schedules on several different days.

Nobody, not you or any other veteran has to know who the media person is or what that person observes and records.

Whatever the media person does in their pursuit of truth and justice is not something that you 'have to/need to' know about.

You can't be held accountable for something that you have no knowledge of.

After all, the VA has nothing to hide and should welcome the attention.

Lots of veterans wear hats that denote one thing or another about their service to their VA appointments.

Talk about a good place to hide a 'cell phone' recording/transmitting device.

On that same note, many of the cell phones today have the capability to record audio and visual that can be downloaded later.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

There may very well be some rules that apply to licensed veterans advocates that prevent you from speaking to veterans who are represented by someone else... rules that don't apply to non-professionals.

An attorney can NOT speak to anyone who is represented by another attorney, he can only speak to that persons attorney.

So, it may be that it's your being "certified by the NVLSP as a veterans advocate" that causes you to be unable to speak with vets that are already represented. It's an ethics thing. I bet the same thing applies; If any of you are represented by DAV, call up American Legion and tell them "I"m represented by DAV, can I speak to you?" and see what they say. It also explains why the VA guy told the other folks not to listen to you, if he knew they were already represented.

All of this is pure speculation on my part. :) But it makes sense, and it makes what the VA guy AND the DAV girl both said make just a bit more sense.

*/ The comments and opinions expressed above are solely those of the commenter in their personal capacity and do not in any way represent the Department of Veterans Affairs. */

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cruinthe.

You stated:

" I am certified by the NVLSP as a veterans advocate"

This is good, I suppose, but, are you, in fact an accredited veterans service officer, authorized by the VA Office of General Counsel to represent veterans for a recognized and authorized Veterans Service Organization, and are you properly prepared to do so? And, are you, in fact, covered by an insurance policy that covers "mal-practice", just in case you should inadvertently incorrectly advise a veteran and he/she suffers monetary loses due to your representation?

The answers to the above could be the reason for your problems.

Couldn't they?

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Im kind of interested in this thread? What are the legal ins and outs to being a VSO? How does one get to be so? Can it be done in a way that is legal, while someone has a full time job (like the advocate type position referenced here, but without the legal hassle)? I find im spending a lot of time here, and I spend a LOT of time over the years at VBN (going on 9 years there).

I gues since ive done my own claims, talked to others about doing theirs, done voc rehab, Ive seen what a difference a won claim, or Voc can make in a person, including me, and Id like to pass that on down the line.

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Va has shown to be real cheaters, and not just the VA, but the DAV, and the state offices are all in this racket together. And the cure for this ailment is conversations. Sites like this one and others like this allow Vets to obtain information from each other, to combat the VA and all the legal greed. The very people who are charged with looking out for us, have been looking out for themselves. All the monies that they owe vets from the past, has been cut into by the power of conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use