Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Received Negative Decision, Filed An Nod, Question

Rate this question


retiredat44

Question

Received a negative decision, filed an NOD. My VSO (Veteran service officer), told me that I could not files any statements with the NOD (he typed it up), only the NOD. MY question that I want to ask is why did they only rule on one out of 4 chemicals I got sick from and are clearly in my claim and IMO. They totally left out three chemicals I got sick from on active duty. he said I have to wait until they send the forms asking if I have more information to add to my claim. That may take 6 weeks.

I know I alreayd posted this in my claims denied thread, but I am not sure if I am going ot get any responses buried in that thread.

So, I guess we cannot get any questions answer on any aspects of the denied claim until there is a hearing?

I believe the people who did the claim purposely left out the information, or they lost part of my claim, or??

This is very serious, as if they just don't pay atttention and wite anything they want, how can they get away with that?

The VSO seems to think I need to bring in new proof, yet I say they purposely ignored proof.. so if they never used it, isn't it new, it should be re-applied and it can easily be shown the core of the case was fraudulently and not investigated. Just ignored.

To remind everyone , I worked and got sick from:

Jet Fuel,

Deisel,

Leaded gasoline,

Trichloroethylene

They only denied the whole claim on Jet Fuel, with no mention of the rest of the chemicals in the DENIED.

That was a huge ommitance. I want the Response in my hearing request to show the other chemicals were completely un addressed. Also, how and why were they left out? on purpose, stupidity?

Please, any ideas?

There is no question of whether or not I had contact, or questons of if I got sick..

the questions are health effects. Everything else was agreed when my records are reviewed showg illness contact, and my 50% current rating.

Thanx..

Edited by retiredat44

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Larry-it looks like my assessment of the 1151 issue is gone from this thread.It included a BVA decision exactly like what the VA admitted to in this SOC.

My suggestions were completely ignored by retiredat44 and no one else picked up on it.

I know exactly how you feel.

Yesterday ,after trying to get info from a sick individual I know (non vet),and in the midst of lots of out of state company-

I found in mere seconds that this MH patient was treated with a med that there have been numerous lawsuits over, and many are still ongoing.

I took the time to even contact lawyers for them as they have a very valid basis for suit against Eli Lilly as well as their MH doctors and some lawyers I contacted want to hear from them right away.

They have developed a severe documented disability directly due to this medication (DMII) and 33 states have already filed suit as well as individuals against the drug manufacturers because the med was being prescribed to people with chronic depression but it is really for bi polar and schizophrenia and is know to cause DIABETES MELLITUS!!!

It is Zyprexa!

They said they would read the extensive downloaded material I sent them but don't know if they will contact a lawyer because they doubt I know anything about negligence ,personal injury and malpractice.

I gave them a week to contact a lawyer and then I will give up on them.

Lilly Co as been sued for Billions because this drug ( deliberately prescribed to Pts with depression and not bi polar,schizophrenia,also causes pancreatic problems and has contributed to deaths.

"And, before anyone gets all whacked outta shape about "my attitude" let me assure you that I do really want to help, but, the lack of motivation on someone else's part does not NOT constitute a desire for self-flagellation on mine."

I feel the same way.

Most of the time I spend at hadit is really spent instead by searching for info to support anything I say in a reply-and the above BVA case I mentioned in the missing posts took considerable time to find.

I am not going to be wasting that kind of time anymore because anyone here can search the net for info they need to support their claim.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

retired,

Regarding this part of your last post,

" After review of your service treatment records and claim file, the examiner provided the opinion that you're your allergies, hands swell, and skin rash occurred while in service and were secondary to exposure to fuel, but there was no current skin condition

Therefore, the previous denial of allergies, hands swell, and skin rash is confirmed and continued because the evidence continues to show this condition was not incurred in or aggravated by military service. "

I would certainly continue to argue that these conditions should be granted as service connected even if they are non-compensable at this time.

Afterwards I would take myself to the VAMC or VAMC ER each and every time there is a flare-up and then request an

increase with that additional medical evidence.

38 CFR -

Sec. 4.31 Zero percent evaluations. In every instance where the schedule does not provide a zero percent evaluation for a diagnostic code, a zero percent evaluation shall be assigned when the requirements for a compensable evaluation are not met.[58 FR 52018, Oct. 6, 1993]

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS when the person I mentioned finally told me what med they were on- I recalled something here and searched it and this popped up :

Wings had posted this info here some time ago and the cost of these suits has risen considerably since then

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Retired

You need to fire the DAV and hire a lawyer. Your VSO is going to be your worst enemy by giving you incorrect information. Unless you can fly Larry to your house so he can represent you I would get a lawyer. Claims to do with chemical exposure always seem to get complicated. The more evidence you can get the better. If you have to get 5 IMO's then do it if you can afford it. Evidence, evidence, evidence is what wins claims!

That drug Zprexia, like all anti-psychotic drugs, have very powerful side effects. Some of the well known side effects such as Tardive dyskenisia can become permanent. This is the medical/chemical approach to all emotional illness. I hate it. The doctors always over prescribe this stuff. Seroquel is another ass kicking drug that is for bipolar and schizophrenia. It is not for sleep problems or anxiety. It is an anti-psychotic drug. I am talking about people who are crazy should be the only ones taking these drugs. Going all the way back to the thorazine type drugs these drugs are the alternative to being strapped down on a cot in a mental hospital. These drugs save lives but at a cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if it looks like I ignored something,,, I am really ina ness right now with the rest of my claims and life problems, and whent he time artises I wil look into other things... between illness, and the thopughts of just ending it all,,, or my health killing me first,, and the VA disability cclaims process, and a messed up life... I can't do all this stuff!

If/when the time comes where I can work on more stuff like the 1151, I will, but I can't do a damned thing for now.. if/when my claim is settled permanatnely and I win, I can apply for the ful 100% for my hospitalization, and if any injuries can be filed on on top[ of that I will, but for now, I am trying to stay alive..

every freaking day I question if it is worth trying to live, or if I am going down for the count, again,, it's happned a few times..

Larry-it looks like my assessment of the 1151 issue is gone from this thread.It included a BVA decision exactly like what the VA admitted to in this SOC.

My suggestions were completely ignored by retiredat44 and no one else picked up on it.

I know exactly how you feel.

Yesterday ,after trying to get info from a sick individual I know (non vet),and in the midst of lots of out of state company-

I found in mere seconds that this MH patient was treated with a med that there have been numerous lawsuits over, and many are still ongoing.

I took the time to even contact lawyers for them as they have a very valid basis for suit against Eli Lilly as well as their MH doctors and some lawyers I contacted want to hear from them right away.

They have developed a severe documented disability directly due to this medication (DMII) and 33 states have already filed suit as well as individuals against the drug manufacturers because the med was being prescribed to people with chronic depression but it is really for bi polar and schizophrenia and is know to cause DIABETES MELLITUS!!!

It is Zyprexa!

They said they would read the extensive downloaded material I sent them but don't know if they will contact a lawyer because they doubt I know anything about negligence ,personal injury and malpractice.

I gave them a week to contact a lawyer and then I will give up on them.

Lilly Co as been sued for Billions because this drug ( deliberately prescribed to Pts with depression and not bi polar,schizophrenia,also causes pancreatic problems and has contributed to deaths.

"And, before anyone gets all whacked outta shape about "my attitude" let me assure you that I do really want to help, but, the lack of motivation on someone else's part does not NOT constitute a desire for self-flagellation on mine."

I feel the same way.

Most of the time I spend at hadit is really spent instead by searching for info to support anything I say in a reply-and the above BVA case I mentioned in the missing posts took considerable time to find.

I am not going to be wasting that kind of time anymore because anyone here can search the net for info they need to support their claim.

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just spent one hour with my VSO, and she will also go through the appeals process with me,, she is asking for a BVA video conference..

She likes my IMO and is completely satisfied with it..

so, in a few months there maybe some progress regarding a hearing date..

I have to many irons int he fire, and she says that everything looks god, and not to put any more irons in the fire for now..

I will give her any more medical records I get as I continue going to more doctor appointments..

I have more appointments for neurology, and also the pancreas and liver..

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use