Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Hadit Vso Assistance

Rate this question


chr49

Question

First off, my VSO's are with the TN DVA and I believe they have done their jobs properly. I'm trying to figure out how to keep the following situations from happening again.

Old issue: April 2010; submitted evidence thru my VSO in reply to a VARO request. The VARO said they never received it. I re-filed that evidence in August. A day or two afterwards, I received my c-file and found it contained the date stamped form VA-4138 and all records that my VSO had submitted for me in April. April's evidence was omitted from my July decision. Hopefully, the April evidence will be viewed as new evidence as I move forward in the process.

New issue: August 13th; submitted a NOD thru my VSO. On September 30th, I made an IRIS inquiry to verify the VARO was in receipt of my NOD. I received 2 IRIS replies stating the August 13th NOD was not (1) in my electronic file and was not (2) in my VARO c-file. The last reply advised that my VSO re-file the NOD. I continue to lose time with all of this re-filing.

Questions:

Is this a common problem?

If so, are there any recommendations to remedy this situation?

After my VSO re-files the NOD would it help if I personally send or fax the VARO a copy of NOD?

Thanks in advance for any advise you can give me.

CHR49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

If the paperwork was submitted by your VSO let them handle the fact that the RO says that it was not received. You should not have to provide them with the NOD again as they should have a copy of it in your file kept at their office. Speak with them and see what direction they are going with at this time. If you don't get the answer you want then resend the information yourself.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the paperwork was submitted by your VSO let them handle the fact that the RO says that it was not received. You should not have to provide them with the NOD again as they should have a copy of it in your file kept at their office. Speak with them and see what direction they are going with at this time. If you don't get the answer you want then resend the information yourself.

Sharon,

Thank you. I promise not to send things in without checking with my VSO first, especially since they helped me with the NOD in the first place. I need to talk to him anyway, since I've gotten an 'more likely than not' IMO since we last spoke and he may want to go in a different direction.

I noticed that my IRIS request & reply was copied to the TN DVA but I doubt he'll notice it unless I contact him. I will most likely get some time off work tomorrow so I can run into the city and get this taken care of.

I was concerned that we may doing something wrong which is causing the problem I've had twice now. My wife says it's more likely a TN DVA & VARO issue than our issue but either way, I'd like to know that the VARO is getting my paperwork. The medical files that were omitted from my decision may have made a difference in one of the decisions.

I appreciate the advice I've received here, especially running things thru my VSO as usual but sending in the paperwork myself so I can get verification that it's been received. We'll see how it goes with my VSO...he's a pretty good guy and has been very helpful.

CHR49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Because I only live about 25 miles from my VARO I hand deliver important documents. My VARO has lost every document I ever sent them. They get 10,000 pieces of mail a day. They were delaying my claim because they said I did not have a DD214 even though I had been SC'ed for 30 years. Of course, I took them a brand new certifed copy of my DD214. A copy was sitting in my c-file but they were too lazy to look for it. I mean how can you respect people like this? I trust no one at the VARO including the VSO's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have exactly the same situation. My VSO addressed the letter with NOD'S. ect. with their name of the organization to the regional office in Phoenix. I was given the letter, sealed, stamped and told to mail it. Its been over 1 month, nothing has been received. So what I have been forced to do, was to submit the documents myself, done by myself with the reason why I was doing this in case the original turns up in a couple of years. In fact, I probably did a better job than what they did as I used there original, fine tuned it, supplied a few supporting documents, got a big mailer from Walmart, and over nighted, return receipt certified-don't tell me they won't receive this. That extra step of sending a letter addressed to the DAV at the regional office caused some more grief. The less people that are involved-the better. The paperwork must get straight to the mail room where it is sorted, processed to the correct dept, and put officially in the system. I even called the headquarters of the DAV 2 weeks ago, told me they would call back.(and they wanted me to join the organization which I did). The local office can't track this. This is totally unacceptable. I thought it would be a great idea to get a good VSO to assist me, so it looks like the idea of them preparing the documents is good, but you must be responsible of mailing them as noted above. That letter probably is in file 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Cool

Probably the only VSO around here you can trust is Larry and we can't clone him......yet! To appreciate what a vet goes through with a claim you need to be a vet who has been screwed over in the grand style. When they lose your documents and forget to mail out notice of c&p exams you begin to understand them. They don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Proof of receipt of documentation should work in both directions. If we mail something, we must have proof they received it. If they mail something, they automatically assume we have received it.

Has anyone ever used return receipt to find the VA confirms only the receipt of an envelope, but not the contents of the envelope?

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use