Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Combat Status

Rate this question


tom91

Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Founder

Update

 

 

M21-1, Part V, Subpart iv, Chapter 1, Section B - Codesheet Section

3 Combat Status Codes


Introduction

 

This topic contains information about combat codes, including

Change Date

 
December 13, 2005

V.iv.1.B.3.a.  Definition:  Combat Disability

 

The term combat disability applies to any injury incurred in action against an enemy of the United States or as a result of an act of such an enemy.  These injuries include
  • wounds by missiles (bullets or shrapnel)
  • psychological trauma or posttraumatic stress disorder experienced in accidents, explosions, or airplane crashes during a period when the Veteran was in combat, and
  • diseases directly attributable to exposure to the elements as a result of action against the enemy or by the enemy, such as exposure following an airplane crash or shipwreck.

Reference:  For more information on combat-related disabilities, see M21-1, Part V, Subpart ii, 2.A.3.d.


V.iv.1.B.3.b.  Description of Combat Status Codes

 

The table below contains descriptions for each of the four combat status codes.
 
Code
Description
1-None
Indicates no combat disabilities.
2-(Comp.)
One or more combat disabilities, all of which are compensable.
3-(Noncomp.)
One or more combat disabilities, none of which are compensable.
4-(Both)
One or more combat disabilities, not all of which are compensable.

 

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I would put zero concern in this, especially if you were in combat or not.  I have seen veterans come unhinged at their rating stating (for example), 'PTSD - non combat', when in fact they were in combat.  Doesn't affect their rating yet they are losing sleep over it.  Like they have to wear a patch on their motorcycle vest that says 'non combat disabled vet'. I'm using myself as an example.  Took me awhile to let that one go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Since 1985 I have had Nam combat PTSD ratings from 30 to 50 to 70% and P&T TDIU now with SMC-S and 100% P&T combined.  At no time have I ever seen the words or code in my files and VA documents stating my PTSD was due to combat.   Must be something new. Just saying

combinededitedcroppedperkins507thDustoffmedevacUH-1Hrescuehoist.jpg.fb92df48a06113b69d51fd0851e605d2.jpg

large combined perkins photo with purple heart.JPG

Edited by Dustoff1970
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combat Status Codes are as follows:

1-None Indicates no combat disabilities.

2-(Comp.) One or more combat disabilities, all of which are compensable.

3-(Noncomp.) One or more combat disabilities, none of which are compensable.

4-(Both) One or more combat disabilities, not all of which are compensable.

Hope this helps.

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the codes do not indicate that I was NOT in combat zone but simply whether or not I have a disability from combat. Correct?

Combat Status Codes are as follows:

1-None Indicates no combat disabilities.

2-(Comp.) One or more combat disabilities, all of which are compensable.

3-(Noncomp.) One or more combat disabilities, none of which are compensable.

4-(Both) One or more combat disabilities, not all of which are compensable.

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It does not even denote combat status. I think the default is (1.) Unless you make an issue of it you get a code of non combat injury because for VA purpose it does not matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use