Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Has Anyone Ever Waived The Dro Decision And Gone On To The Bva

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

I ve been waiting 2 years for DRO review decision. My attorney and the DRO had conducted a telephone hearing over a year ago. No C&P exams scheduled. I do plan on asking this question of my attorney, but I was wondering if anyone here has done this before? This DRO has given us some very negative input regarding my claim.

My attorney's assistant is telling me that the DRO has been assigned by the LARO Management to work new claims only. This has been going on for about a year now and i do not see any end to it with new claims coming in so fast.

appreciate any response

Thanks

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think you need to sit down with your lawyer and get a plan. He is your representative. If your claim is just going to spin at the DRO then something needs to happen. Two years at the DRO is to long IMO. The DRO is supposed to divert BVA claims. If you have to wait years then the system has failed and you might as well go to the BVA but that means another two years probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell your attorney to file a writ of mandamus petition. That ought to get the DRO's attention. The DRO decision might go against you, but at least you'd get some movement. What usually happens with a writ petition is that the VA will take the action it should have taken earlier, and then the Court will deny you the writ because the issue has become moot. The whole purpose is to get some movement, so if you get movement, you in essence have won even if the Court says otherwise.

It sounds like you're desitned for the Board, regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell your attorney to file a writ of mandamus petition. That ought to get the DRO's attention. The DRO decision might go against you, but at least you'd get some movement. What usually happens with a writ petition is that the VA will take the action it should have taken earlier, and then the Court will deny you the writ because the issue has become moot. The whole purpose is to get some movement, so if you get movement, you in essence have won even if the Court says otherwise.

It sounds like you're desitned for the Board, regardless.

I wanted the attorney, Ken Carpenter, to file a writ of mandamus last month and the reply was that we are not at that point yet. They mentioned the amount of work it would take to create the writ..

I ll talk to his assistant tomorrow and ask if we can waive the DRO decision and go on to the BVA. I agree, from the negative input he has provided about the claim he does not plan to grant it. I think the attorney wants to see his bases and reasons so they can respond appropiately at the BVA and therefore ask me to stay the course until a decision is reached. The crystal ball says that this could take another two years.

Paul

Edited by hurryupnwait

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hurry,

I would find out the name of the VSCM at your VARO to write and mail

a letter to directly, or submit it in person to the RO and get a date stamped copy.

I would run it by my attorney first.

Another thing is, you just can't go and say - forget the DRO, I'll go to BVA.

First an I-9 (form 9) has to be prepared and sent to BVA, then you probably have a two year

wait before you hear anything AT ALL from them.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I think the attorney wants to see his bases and reasons so they can respond appropiately at the BVA"

I do too-

Ken Carpenter is one of the BEST attorneys for vets- in my opinion.

A Petition of Mandamus (I had filed one many years ago and Ken Carpenter called me when he saw my name on the CAVC docket-)

is only appropriate when ALL avenues of appeal have been exhausted.

I lost the writ and he thought I had filed a denied case at the court (reason for his call) but nevertheless we talked for over an hour and he supported the essense of the claim that my Mandamus was based on and said to keep him in mind if my claim went to the CAVC (might have been COVA then).

I asked him for the names of some Court cases he had won and he gave me some names.I read them and knew right away-

he sure knew his stuff.

Is there any possibility you can gather more evidence?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update

Called the Attorney's assistant today. The DRO starting working the claim again. Apparently, he will be sending a letter with medical records to Dr. Bash asking for a clarification of his medical opinion. Dr. Bash wrote a medical opinion that probably weighted the claim in my favor, but the letter was full of typo errors and I think this DRO is having a field day trying to discredit his opinion.

Thanks

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use