Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Finally, Dx & Sc & Ssd Granted For Ms

Rate this topic


autumn

Recommended Posts

  • Founder

Bittersweet does sound right. I am really happy for you, there is nothing worse than the doctors ignoring you, I hope you get that 25 year retro.

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Obviously, over 20 years of retroactive compensation is an amount not to be taken lightly. (Ask Berta!)

I suspect that the VA hopes the appeals process takes long enough that they might get out of paying all of what is due, or the retro award occurs on somebody else's watch.

If I were in your shoes, and given the seriousness of MS, along with the other problems, including mis-diagnosis, etc., I'd seriously think about filing an immediate NOD at the very least. It also may be that your case meets the requirements for an 1151 claim and federal tort. (Mal practice - lawyer time!) Sometimes just the fact that the VA knows a good and effective lawyer is involved helps them to make more favorable and fair decisions.

Unfortunately, a lawyer does get a cut (at your expense) of the action. (Usually ~ 20% of any retro paid as a result of the lawyers representation. The VA charges the lawyer ~$100 as a fee for sending your money directly. Note that bona fide expenses can be billed directly to the veteran, and may be above the 20% set by law. Some lawyers include the expenses in the 20%. If you do elect to "hire a lawyer", make sure that the lawyer is registered and qualified to handle VA cases, and also practices in the federal district and appeals courts.

A comment, due to your statements-- "i still never had a VA neuro diagnosis me", and "VA neuro's dismissed those reports"

To me refusal to diagnose, and refusal to consider valid medical evidence is, of itself, evidence of refusal to treat and malpractice. Having the records to prove that such events occurred is a problem when it comes to legal action.

want to thank hadit.com and posters here who helped educate me regarding VA claims, etc.

the VA SC'd my MS recently after 24 years of mis-diagnosis and mis-med-labels. the C&P doctor took no time at all to diagnosis MS and write SC in his assessment. i still never had a VA neuro diagnosis me. WTF?! seriously, how crazy is that?

if not for this site it would never have dawned on me to seek assessments from non-VA doctors via my own savings. guess it was worth it. all of them diagnosed me with MS in short amounts of time. all VA neuro's dismissed those reports, and wouldn't help with getting them in my VA records. happy to say they treat me a little different now that the C&P/VRO granted a diagnosis of MS and SC.

even though the VRO and C&P stated my MS started on active duty 24 years ago they only sent a 2 year retro check. guess that is standard as now i will get my secondary MS issues tacked on and then request the full 24 years retro. plus their diagnostic codes have been incorrect for my spinal herniations and disease. so i'll file a claim for those issues too.

don't know what is in store now, but a bittersweet feeling exists that someone finally listened at the VA. no one wants this creepy MS stuff for sure. but to have it and get dismissed via VA health rationing just made it worse. and, many of us have to spend our own money and seek help outside the VA just to get the VA to do the right thing. [doesn't make sense to me at all]

many thanks to all veterans here and to Dr Bash, the PVA, and my non-VA neurologists and my MS support groups. Dr Bash clearly exposed the truth in my medical records that had been there all these years. Glad I found him, as i was never able to find a doctor at any VA that would write anything remotely in my favor...an that just flat weirds me out.

still work to be done but the main hurdle is behind me now...

mucho gracias to all

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use