Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Vamc Medications& Exams

Rate this question


Mcafee

Question

Hello All Hope All is Well.

My question is simple does the Veterans Administration Health Care system have an obligation to a maintenance of any individual taking numerous amounts of medication such as narcotics,gabapentin,tramadol,viagra,baclofin,ETC.

Such as scheduled blood work physical exams,ETC.

Thank You for your feed back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Every doctor, VA or non VA has an obligation to monitor for meds that might be contraindicated by something else- or dosages that should be either or lower.

Do they do it all the time? NO

I feel every vet and actually every American should have copies of their personal medical records and monitor themselves what they are taking and checking these meds on good web sites to see if they are taking a cocktail that is compounding its own purpose.

For example if a vet takes a HBP lowering med then is given a med for something that also can raise BP--this is something that should be monitored by the doc and perhaps the meds should be changed.

You know my husband was a victim of medical errors that involved 2 separate incidents regarding his medication. I proved , and the OGC agreed, that one of these errors contributed to his death.

But it took a lot of research on my part to find out that what appeared to be an innocent prescribed med (which one can buy over the counter as well) was prescribed to him by VA to take 6 times a day for, to my shocking revelation, a condition his VA med recs revealed he didnt even have.It was only one part of my FTCA case.Negligence has a snowball affect.

This med was also contraindicated by another med they gave him.

If a medication error causes additional documented disability or death the VA can be sued or a Section 1151 claim can be filed (or both in some cases)

Before it gets to that point, any questionable meds or dosage or combos of meds should be discussed with you primary care physician.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My Doc will not write or renew scripts unless she sees me first.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank You for your replies.My next question is there a statue or legal law that applies? Will be part of my FED.TORT claim.along with medical malpractice and negligence as you know I have had a lapriscopic prostatectomy,and other issues to include orthopedic.The Chief of orthopedics at this facility put in progressnotes QUOTE (WE SHALL NOT REVIEW ANY PAST MEDICAL HISTORY)UNQUOTE .Needless to say have not seen an orthopedist at this facility since.I have taken my health care outside of VA to which shall be included in this claim.

Edited by Mcafee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the VA is prescribing those drugs to you they have to check you out and do blood and urine work on you. That is their responsibility. If they give you narcotics they WILL check you. That is basic. As far as your private history I don't think that is their responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"My next question is there a statue or legal law that applies? Will be part of my FED.TORT claim.along with medical malpractice and negligence as you know I have had a lapriscopic prostatectomy,and " ....

Your lawyer would have that answer.

Ethics never became an issue in my FTCA claim.

The sole focus I had was the documented evidencxe of negligence and malpractice and how it led to death of my husband.

I did find an old part of M21-1MR which I used for my FTCA claim.

It was doctor's instructions as to how to handle patients in the ER who were also employees of the VA.

It basically said get them back on the job ASAP.

This is the reason they treated my husband's initial heart attack as a sinus infection.He was a VAMC employee.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use