Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Dental Question

Rate this question


VetsLady

Question

Hi Everyone,

Here is a question ...... A Veteran receives the decision rating them at 100% with an earlier effective date of 5 years prior.

What date are they eligible for dental care at the VAMC ? The date of the decision or the effective date ?

And, if it's the EED, then wouldn't the Veteran be entitled to reimbursement for their out of pocket dental expenses now that they have

that 100% decision in hand ? Dental isn't even a benefit until a Veteran is rated at 100%.

VetsLady

Edited by VetsLady

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Its not likely you will be reimbursed for dental expenses from 5 years ago. It will only apply to future dental work, regardless of the effective date. You can, however, apply for reimbursment for copayments you may have made on prescriptions back to the effective date.

This is often a nice check for people. I think mine was about $200. I just went to my VA, and there was a special person who handles such stuff. I didnt even try to figure it out, just gave him a copy of my decision and about 6 weeks later got a check.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not likely you will be reimbursed for dental expenses from 5 years ago. It will only apply to future dental work, regardless of the effective date. You can, however, apply for reimbursment for copayments you may have made on prescriptions back to the effective date.

This is often a nice check for people. I think mine was about $200. I just went to my VA, and there was a special person who handles such stuff. I didnt even try to figure it out, just gave him a copy of my decision and about 6 weeks later got a check.

Thanks for the response Bronco .... it does not seem fair to deny something that a Vet is entitled to just because the decision was made 5 years later.

Unfortunately, he won't receive reimbursement for copays or RX copays as we had private insurance that we paid for. He was a Cat. 8 then, prior to any sc, which didn't happen

until '08 when he rec'd 70% so we continued to utilize our private health providers. He started with the VA medical care and RX's after his 70%....

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

They explained that since I did receive outside dental care before I became 100 percent, even though my effective date was for several years back, They could not and would not reimburse that portion. I had dental insurance so I gave up and let it go as I was tired after a very long battle with the RO. I did get my Medicine copays back with interest.

It really is a sad situation in this case.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They explained that since I did receive outside dental care before I became 100 percent, even though my effective date was for several years back, They could not and would not reimburse that portion. I had dental insurance so I gave up and let it go as I was tired after a very long battle with the RO. I did get my Medicine copays back with interest.

It really is a sad situation in this case.

J

Thank you for the response. It is a sad situation especially since if he hadn't had any of the dental care for the past 5 years, he probably wouldn't have any teeth left.

He lost 4-5 as it was. This last big bill we had was so close (7 days) to the date he received his 100% rating decision, Fee Services said to send at least that one in...

nothing to lose. 50/50 is better than if I don't send it in at all.

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use