Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
ptsd Fiduciary Mess And Writ Of Mandamus
Rate this question
-
Similar Content
-
- 0 comments
- 947 views
-
- 0 replies
- 330 views
-
- 3 answers
- 313 views
-
- 0 comments
- 1,080 views
-
- 0 replies
- 353 views
-
Question
Berta
We have had fiduciary questions here from time to time:
I am again bringing this WACO fiasco up because this is serious business and I dont know why it isnt on major TV News Channels (yet...)
http://www.vawatchdogtoday.org/uploads/20110112-_Pet_for_Ex_Relief.pdf
This is link to the Writ of Mandamus that Doug Rosinki filed regarding a vet who it looks like lost QUITE a bit of his money
in addition to VA comp to some federal appointed fiduciary that VA never checked out nor is the VAOIG concerned (...yet).
I wanted to give link to the writ- to show you what the VA has been sanctioning in direct violations of many veteran's rights.
Also Doug always prepares exempliary Writs of Mandamus so this is a great example of one.
These are not vets who can pursue a claim or fight with VA over a rating-these are veterans who are so disabled that
they cannot have access to their own money due to some incompetency declaration by the VA and then they are forced to get some bogus federal appointed fiduciary.
The incompentency regs are there at Watchdog today-I found it startling that VA isn't granting hearings if these vets request one.
This is why-in my opinion- the VA is deliberately preventing vets filing under the new PTSD regs from obtaining an IMO because as I have mentioned in the IMO forum that a MH IMO should contain a medical statement that the vet is fully competent.
The VA has ensured itself that new PTSD vets (those granted under the New Rules) who are declared incompetent -have no where
to go to get DUE PROCESS. They cant get an IMO for the claim and then if they succeed, VA can declare them incompetent with no problem.
The VA has also ensured that federal fiduciaries can step in and control the veteran's money.
They are even messing around with family members that were already appointed as fiduciary.
Cripes I used to joke VA would try to declare me incompetent so they didnt have to pay me my VA money as the civilian widow of a veteran.
Maybe that joke had some basis in reality.
This nightmare is by far worse than Shreddergate- at least those vets had a legal recourse via VA and were competent enough to fight over shredded stuff.Many of these vets with fiduciaries have no recourse at all.
I even wonder if this falls under RICO.
Or jurisdiction of the FBI.
I have 3 vets I am concerned about that are incompetent vets and will be checking with them to see if VA in NY has started to mess around with them.
Edited by BertaGRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !
When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief
Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was
simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."
Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
1
1
1
Popular Days
Jan 19
4
Feb 6
2
Jan 20
1
Feb 5
1
Top Posters For This Question
Berta 4 posts
Pete53 1 post
broncovet 1 post
Bonzai 1 post
Popular Days
Jan 19 2011
4 posts
Feb 6 2012
2 posts
Jan 20 2011
1 post
Feb 5 2012
1 post
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now