Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Hardship Letter Letter Slowed Process?

Rate this question


88 mike

Question

I called the 1 800# today and was told that they (authorization) are reviewing my hardship letter and that my claim will be done soon. When I visited the RO my claim already had been decided. The case worker I saw had me submit the letter due to overdue bills. Do you guys think that letter slowed things down or did it help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hey funny you should have brought this up. I had a guy tell me if a veteran had a utility bill or repossesion or foreclousure it would in effect be proof of the hardship. I submited all above except for utilitiy and my claim is still hovering somewhere at VARO. Me I wish I was lucky as the other veteran was to get his claim done and over with. I hope this helps it is about all I can offer. My phone was turned off I am still waiting on the letter from the Phone company to submit it. Adios and have a good day..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA's handling of claims has got to be the best example of fraud, waste and abuse that I've ever run across.

That said, please consider this - -

A "broken system" such as the VA's seldom if ever works in any logical fashion, and becomes a massive time and money sink. Who benefits?

It's not (obviously) the veteran or the veteran's dependents. It's not the government in general, because the cost of administering veteran's benefits is significantly increased.

It's certainly not the taxpayers, or the politicians, because money is wasted that might be put to better use elsewhere.

Who Benefits? The VA's bureaucracy, that's who! How? Justification for unending increases in the size of the administrative work force.

This means more money for those in management, more management positions, more management bonuses, more employees under management, and do to sheer size,

more opportunity to take advantage of the loopholes in such a system.

To answer your question, a "hardship" status supposedly decreases the time to get a claim through the system. But, (and it's a biggie)

The VA bureaucratic system has a large number of conflicting goals and priorities. Some are such things as multiple groups that by law, regulation, or VA internal practice, are given "priority".

If you were to try and form a logical idea of how a particular claim should be prioritized-- you would need to consider such things as - -

Hardship

Member of group given priority besides hardship (Certain "combat" veterans)

Member of group given priority by court order (Nehmer as an example)

Political involvement. Political inquiry with response dates required, etc.

Size of potential award. (Seems to be an internal VA thing involving extra steps in process)

Percentage assigned by compensation schedule - - Besides higher compensation, higher percentages can require the VA to do such things as eliminate "co-pay", and provide additional compensation beyond the basic schedular amount.

Amount of time the claim has been in the system.

Obviously, the VA has it's own unique ways of setting priority.

One "proven" big one is that a "simple" uncomplicated claim involving 10-20% may make it "out the door" in a few weeks or months, regardless of any other considerations.

This is why many VSO's advocate filing a simple claim to get a veteran "in the system" as quickly as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I just helped a veteran who was claiming hardship. The veteran was told to file the hardship forms in conjuction with a TDIU application. According to his service officer the VA puts a color coded tag on the outside of the file indicating expeditied processing due to hardship. In this case the veteran was recently service connected at 50% and it had been documented by clinicians for the previous ten years that he was homeless living in a van with his dog. Things went really quick as far as I am concerned. I was told they are supposed to process these claims in 90 days.. The ninety days went by and his service officer told us she was going to talk to the "rating coach". Two days later the veteran got a call from the service officer telling him his TDIU was awarded and he would have a retro check within 5 days. The retro check was in his bank account three days later.

The RO had really botched this claim. They got bogus medical reports which made me get IMO's that made the VA doctors look like idiots. The reports I got were cited as the basis for service connection in an earlier decision. It would have been embarasing if a veteran had been homless for ten years for a condition he should have been service connected at 30% in 1977 continued to get the run around. I told the SO to let the DRO know that I was still helping this veteran and that I got the IMO's chastizing the military and the VA for not treating the veteran 30 years ago and I would go public.with local news if they did not do something quick. It could have been a combination of the application for expediting the claim and the potential for embarrasment that resulted in his getting his retro so fast. Maybe threats work. I am not sure.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Maybe threats work. I am not sure"

That is how I finally got my offset money.Not exactly a threat at all- I just reminded some VA lawyers of what I know

about their secret FTCA dirty underwear which I am holding onto documentation of and still investigating.

The regs clearly supported my FTCA offset refund.But the RO and even the regional counsel tried to tell me I was wrong.

After months of arguing with illiterates - I spent 3-4 days calling the OGC in DC to get this squared away and then a top honcho OGC sent the RO the very same regs I sent VA and told them to pay me.

Thank you for helping this vet Hoppy.

These really aren't threats to VA- they are the strong steps some of us have to take to get what is ours by law.

Hardship Waivers are only as good as the claim is.Have vet friend who filed for hardship but it will only produce a faster denialin his case . He hasn't done the leg work.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use