Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Top 10 Veterans Cases

Rate this question


deltaj

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I came across an article on the internet entitled Top 10 Veterans Service-Connected Disability Compensation Benefit Cases Decided by the Federal Circuit in 2009-2010 on the website of the law office of Donald D. Vanarelli Blog. If someone could put up a link to that blog I would appreciate it. The material is fascinating reading and provides a small goldmine of information. The Federal Circuit cases mentioned on the blog were Shinseki v. Sanders, Henderson v. Shinseki, Cushman v. Shinseki, Charles v. Shinseki, Golz v. Shinseki, Amberman v. Shinseki, Butler v. Shinseki, Munro v. Shinseki, Colantonio v. Shinseki, Nielson v. Shinseki. The aforementioned links also provides the case numbers. One case that particularly interested me and which I read was the case about Eugene Charles. He filed a claim in 1980 which was denied by V.A. and during the appeal period submitted new and material evidence in support of the claim. V.A. failed to prepare a statement of case after receipt of that evidence. A subsequent claim filed 2 years later was denied but no new and material evidence was submitted within a year. On appeal that claim was determined abandoned by BVA and CAVC. The Federal Circuit seemed to state in the Charles case that the lower court erred in determining that the 1982 claim was abandoned because the earlier 1980 claim was rendered non final by V.A.'s failure to act after receipt of evidence in support of the 1980 claim.

Edited by deltaj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

http://www.dvanarelli.com/blog/?p=6687#more-6687

Good info Delta!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I cant wait to read these-

some we discussed here already and Harvey V SHinseki isnt in this list as this decision is new-

-I need to remind all Harvey is new and it contains dynamic court review.

It contains the strongest wording yet to find the Secretary in contempt.

As Carlie replied to this case:

"Here, it took the Secretary 666 days to comply with the Court's June 2008 remand order."

That is absurd.

A lawyer just told a vet I know to send the VA a copy of it- as he has been in a stall pattern on remand too,.

I think Katrina Eagles won this case.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

This means there is hope for me. My lawyer says he will take my CUE to the federal court if we don't win at the Vet's Court. If a WWII vet can win after 50 years then so can I after a mere 35 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This May help my claim also, where the VA never sent me a statement of the case after a C&P exam in 1973.

Many Thanks

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use