Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Does This Mean?

Rate this question


JHawks

Question

I called the 800# to get an update on my claim. When the conversation was over I hung up, shook my head and just laughed.

My claim has been at the raters since 1/20. No big deal. I understand the issues being faced and I'm not loooooosing my mind over the wait, just he conversation I just had.

The lady was real nice. She opened her screen and said my claim was for such and such and I said, yes. She went on to say they are also looking into my request for Chapter 35 benefits and P&T. I laughed and said "Mam, I didn't put in a claim for either of those and I don't have a clue what you are talking about". She just replied "Mr. H, all I can do is read what is on the screen pertaining to your claim. It says you put in for both of those items." They haven't even rated my claim yet so why are they saying they are looking into Chapter 35 and P&T?

What on earth is she talking about?

Edited by JHawks

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

She went on to say they are also looking into my request for Chapter 35 benefits and P&T. I laughed and said "Mam, I didn't put in a claim for either of those and I don't have a clue what you are talking about". She just replied "Mr. H, all I can do is read what is on the screen pertaining to your claim. It says you put in for both of those items." They haven't even rated my claim yet so why are they saying they are looking into Chapter 35 and P&T?

What on earth is she talking about?

JHawks,

Well for one thing when you are 70% or higher SC'd I believe the VA

is to infer a claim for IU.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JHawks,

Well for one thing when you are 70% or higher SC'd I believe the VA

is to infer a claim for IU.

Carlie;

I just looked on Ebenefits and things changed.

Ebenefits was showing my claim in the "Decision Phase" for the following contentions:

severe bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome secondary to bilateral ankle condition and bilateral knee condition

Now it changed. It still is in Decision Phase but the "contentions" have changed to:

  • right hand carpal tunnel syndrome
  • left hand carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Ch. 35 entitlement to DEA

Edited by JHawks

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you are working you won't get TDIU. They verify income with Social Security.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are working you won't get TDIU. They verify income with Social Security.

Pete,

I didn't put in for TDIU. I put in a claim for Bi=Lateral CTS secondary to SC conditions. The changes to the Ebenefits site were made while my current claim is at the raters.

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a question. The cat is 70% rated, put in for bi lateral CTS. I don't know what his other ratings are for but wouldn't it seem a good chance of being approved for TDIU?

BrookH

Pete,

I didn't put in for TDIU. I put in a claim for Bi=Lateral CTS secondary to SC conditions. The changes to the Ebenefits site were made while my current claim is at the raters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use