Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Interesting Turn Of Events

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

Good morning crew -

Some history: filed a claim for GERD in 2009. Have all proof in my service records AND an IMO from the treating physician. Had the C&P which showed the reaction on screen during the test (had to swallow the awful thick chalky stuff -gross). Been sending emails to my VSO, using IRIS to check status and getting nowhere. I'm now approaching the one-year mark on a claim that should have been a "no-brainer", and forwarded a form 9 to my VSO in preparation for the issue going to appeal. The following email transaction happens (please be patient - it's long):

VSO: Why a form 9? You use a form 9 after a statement of a case. You have not had a statement of a case

Me: I thought I had to submit within a year of notification letter denying the claim. In reading the instructions, though, it says I have a year or 60 days from the SOC or SSOC date, whichever gives me the most time. Since I've not received a SOC I assume the 1-year from notification stands? I can only guess that since they've not responded, or consider this claim closed I will end up with another appeal. I wanted to make sure the document was ready to submit as I'm getting close to the 1 year mark from the date on the notification letter denying the claim - I don't have it with me, but my email traffic with your note re: reconsideration started mid-April 2010. Let me know if I need to go in a different direction, or if I need to submit a different form.

VSO: Has the reconsideration been denied?

Me: Don't know. They insist there's been no reconsideration, so I can only guess and follow the next step in the process.

VSO: Dr. letter we sent on the GERD reconsideration in March of 2010 and the 4142 that claim was denied?

Me: I've enclosed the latest response re: the claim: (Inserted the IRIS response here) I have nothing from the VA since the letter in April 2010, and was under the impression that reconsideration was progressing. Regardless, if this is what the VA insists is the status of this claim, I'm running out of time and don't want to lose the claim date.

VSO: I have reviewed your file and the GERD has not even been touched by the VA so I have placed it in the VA system thru the Coach and you will be hearing from them immediately. the claim will have a date of claim of 1 year as of 3/10/2010. They are a year behind on the claim already so they have to jump on the claim now. So you will be really busy getting your claim completed and the other claim which has been pending also. The appeal which is certified is on hold until these claims are completed. If they are not completed prior to the file going to DC your claims won't have a chance of completing fairly without your original claim file.

My first reaction was - this is a joke, right?? My VSO's been telling me for a year that everything was fine on their end, just be patient. NOW I see this response, and don't know what to make of it. I assume this is a good thing as the claim will finally see the light of day. Any suggestions on what to do next? They should have everything they need for the decision. HELP!!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This topic has me wondering if I can drive down to the Phoenix Varo and if they will see me and address any concerns I have. Or do you have to make an appointment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a hugh 'catch-all' so they can procede at whatever pace they feel, without regards to timelines strictly enforced by them on our end...

just,

Only claimants have time frames to meet - the VBA does not have time frames to meet,

unless imposed by the Court.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just walked into the visitor's center and signed in. My docs were stamped on the spot, and I was handed a copy for my records. Don't know about actually seeing anyone from the VA, but like I said, I saw my VSO pretty quickly after that.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My advice to anyone would be to file the NOD within the year limit. (SOC or not) The VA can always claim that they sent you an SOC, even if you didn't get one.

Carlie -

No appeal yet; didn't want to go down this road unless I have no other choice. I have the form 9 ready and signed, and can ask my wife to deliver and have it stamped if needed. I thought that if the NOD was filed within the year, I had 60 days from the SOC to either appeal or agree with the VA decision? Problem is: I don't a SOC at all from this request. This is where the ball was dropped. I have proof that my VSO sent in the request, along with a signed copy from 14 April (2 weeks after the letter on the denial in 2010) requesting reconsideration. Personally, I'd go after the VA with pit bulls at this point, but really wouldn't know where to start. I've never been in this situation and will look at the CFR to find out what to do when they fail to issue a SOC within the year of the NOD.

As for appealing the whole thing, question: if my c-file is already before the board for one appeal (waiting since 2008), would they review both at the same time?? (Probably no way in H@#$, but would really be nice...)

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use