Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

I Guess I Won Something!

Rate this topic


Philip Rogers

Recommended Posts

PR.....looks like the fight is on!!! Did they state what law/regulation they used in the denial for the 100% plus 60%? NOW, it becomes a matter of what the law says, and giving good argument concerning the "intent of Congress".... this is EXCITING!! With the wording of the laws/regulations, concerning basic compensation rates, SMC rates, sure looks like you will be setting precedent!!!! They HAVE to follow the law/regulation, and they have not. Now, we have to hope that the CAVC finds this case as "interesting", and pulls it up on docket sooner.

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

YES, I think SO!!!!!!!

My CUE is based in part on the link I posted-

SMC is a Mandated statutory benefit.

When VA awards 100% they are supposed to consider either A & A, HB, or any other form of SMC that could be due the veteran.They are supposed to infer SMC and then consider it.

Bradley V Peake changed that to include TDIU as well as 100% schedular.

Every time I read the decision I am cueing I get mad.

It was obvious they made a major error in it.

This is part of a March 2006 response I made to the VA.I pulled it out but the actual citation I quoted in my response-I cant find!

I sure enclosed copy of it with this letter and recall using it for something here and now I cant find it. :blink:

"Your enclosed letter to me, dated March 10, 2006 does not clarify which CUE claim you mean. I filed a CUE claim regarding SMC on July 14, 2004 and an additional CUE on heart disease on Sept 17,2004.

I respond here regarding both of these claims. You have listed the criteria for CUE.

1. VA states : “The claim specifies the factual or legal error”….etc

As stated before to VARO, the VA (38 CFR 1114 et al and M21-1) will consider SMC entitlement for any claim that has SMC potential. The veteran, Mr. Simmons, was denied proper application of this basic VA regulation although he fully satisfied the conditions for consideration. Posthumous rating decisions after his 1994 death failed to extend proper consideration of SMC. I have enclosed as Exhibit A, the M21-1 SMC

Criteria and refer you specifically to Paragraph 8.13:

b. “If the evidence demonstrates disability meeting the criteria for A & A or housebound benefits, entitlement must be established; failure to do so would constitute

clear and unmistakable error."

Whe

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, finally received the decision letter and a SSOC dated two days later. They called a CUE on the ED and hypertension decisions and awarded the SMC "k" award retro to 2001.

As for the 100+60 SMC "s" claim they still denied it, explaining that the additional 60% must be determined using the combined ratings chart.

They also denied my 20 yr old claim for HB/A&A.

It looks as tho I'll need to go to the BVA, on the 100+60 denial. Fun, fun, fun!!!

pr

pr,

That's what I was thinking on the recent bank deposit.

I think the 100 + 60 deal will win at BVA - just some 'mo money' to look forward to down the road : - )

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add:

my SMC CUE is for Accrued benefits. I think VA probably makes any errors in SMC accrued decisions.

This claim is similiar to some degree:

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files1/0900129.txt

THE ISSUE

Whether there was clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in a

February 15, 1997, rating decision, which denied entitlement

to a higher level of special monthly compensation based on

the need for aid & attendance under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1114®(2),

for accrued benefits purposes.

ORDER

A February 15, 1997, rating decision, which denied

entitlement to a higher level of special monthly compensation

based on the need for aid & attendance under 38 U.S.C.A.

§ 1114®(2), for accrued benefits purposes, was clearly and

unmistakably erroneous.

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp09/files1/0900129.txt

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am thinking of 20 years of "S" for Phil in retro. That would be a lot of money. I know Pete53 has the same CUE, and it also means some big money. I think the VA will fight this because of the amount of retro so you guys just have to live long and prosper. Me too on my CUE that is slowly working its way through the court. It is not as clear cut as "S".

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use