Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Getting Dea Started... Should Be Simple, Right?

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

When I got my decision papers for my 100%, they said that my college student kid was eligible for DEA going back to the date I was given as my retro date, which was back in 2009. Yay, this will help her pay off her student loans!!

So my kid fills out the DEA application, sends it in. Gets back a letter from DEA saying she must fill out a very short form, choosing the date from which to begin receiving DEA benefits. The letter clearly states that the choices are between the 2009 date and the date I was notified of my 100% rating (December 2010). Naturally, she chooses the 2009 date to get the retro. She also has taken the letter to her college VA representative, to have them fill out & send in the VA form 1999 (certification of attendance or whatever).

So far so good, right?

Yesterday she gets a letter from the VA saying (italics mine):

"By law, VA can't pay for training you received before you became eligible for benefits. Since you became eligible for benefits on November 22, 2010 (where did this date come from???) we can pay you starting on that date. However, we can pay for the remainder of your training if you return the election sent February 28, 2011. Based on the VA Form 1999 you submitted, we recommend that you choose August 30, 2010 as your begin dated since this was the date you began training."

WTH? Okay, I can see that maybe the college didn't fill out the 1999 right, that they left out her previous year of attendance (she started at this college in fall 2008). So I'm going to call or have her visit the VA rep this week and clarify that. But what the heck is the deal with saying she became eligible on November 2010???

The really funny thing is that the letter she got stating her eligibility began in 2009 and this letter saying Nov 2010 is "signed" by the same person....

Along with this new letter was the VA Form 4107, telling her about her right to appeal. Why the heck should she have to go through the appeal process when this is such a clear bungle?

I'm so mad I could spit nails. I really feel like this is almost intentional, because her first reaction was "Rats, that stinks... oh well..." She doesn't know any better, and would just let it drop.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Hedgey

The VA is up to the same tricks again. They did a similar thing to my son. When they asked him to specify a date, he went to the school and they faxed it in. Then he got a letter saying since he did not specify the date, they had picked the effective date for him. We went back to the school.

The school counselor had a copy of the electronic submission in compliance with the letter, that specified an earlier date for retro. The VA had lost it. (yea right...lost it on purpose).

The counselor sent them a letter explaining and documenting that we had sent the date, on time. Bottom LIne:

He never got the Retro. I am convinced there is still shredding going on at the VA. Even worse, even when you save a copy, they ignore it.

I hope you have better luck...I dont know whether or not this is appealable, but I definately know there is something fishy going on at the VA on a fairly wide scale. This is just my humble opinion. I really dont have a good answer what to do about it.

Even tho the VA "got their way" (dont they always), it did not work out that bad for my son, because he is going to be able to go on for his masters, which he would not have been able to do, if they paid his retro as he would have ran out of DEA. I think you only get about 45 months of DEA...not enough for a masters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My daughter's having the same problem. I won a CUE back to '89, so she had a choice of any date between "89 and 2010 the date of the CUE award. She chose between something like '94 - 2002, so she could get a retro payment, for when she'd attended school before. They denied it. I haven't seen the letter yet but will, when I get home next week. BTW, I don't give up!!!!!!!!!!! Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!

pr

When I got my decision papers for my 100%, they said that my college student kid was eligible for DEA going back to the date I was given as my retro date, which was back in 2009. Yay, this will help her pay off her student loans!!

So my kid fills out the DEA application, sends it in. Gets back a letter from DEA saying she must fill out a very short form, choosing the date from which to begin receiving DEA benefits. The letter clearly states that the choices are between the 2009 date and the date I was notified of my 100% rating (December 2010). Naturally, she chooses the 2009 date to get the retro. She also has taken the letter to her college VA representative, to have them fill out & send in the VA form 1999 (certification of attendance or whatever).

So far so good, right?

Yesterday she gets a letter from the VA saying (italics mine):

"By law, VA can't pay for training you received before you became eligible for benefits. Since you became eligible for benefits on November 22, 2010 (where did this date come from???) we can pay you starting on that date. However, we can pay for the remainder of your training if you return the election sent February 28, 2011. Based on the VA Form 1999 you submitted, we recommend that you choose August 30, 2010 as your begin dated since this was the date you began training."

WTH? Okay, I can see that maybe the college didn't fill out the 1999 right, that they left out her previous year of attendance (she started at this college in fall 2008). So I'm going to call or have her visit the VA rep this week and clarify that. But what the heck is the deal with saying she became eligible on November 2010???

The really funny thing is that the letter she got stating her eligibility began in 2009 and this letter saying Nov 2010 is "signed" by the same person....

Along with this new letter was the VA Form 4107, telling her about her right to appeal. Why the heck should she have to go through the appeal process when this is such a clear bungle?

I'm so mad I could spit nails. I really feel like this is almost intentional, because her first reaction was "Rats, that stinks... oh well..." She doesn't know any better, and would just let it drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hedgey ...

There is an obvious mistake someplace. DEA is started either 1.) the date you became eligible to receive it or 2.) the date you choose, so long as it's completed within 10 years from the date you were notified.

Your daughter has a choice which date to use. Was she full or part time student ? FT = a higher rate of assistance, in our state, 12 credits = FT @ $936.00 a month. Rates for 3/4 and 1/2 time are options as well,

perhaps all states are different BUT your DEA date is the date you choose as it was outlined in your award letter.

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies, everyone. I'm sorry to see that my daughter isn't the only one going through this.

Yep, we know she has the choice of my retro date or the date of notification; I have the letter in front of me as I type.

My VSO said to send them a letter saying essentially "hey, pay attention! Eligibility date is 2009. That date was chosen. School verified enrollment" and that would settle it.

The VA rep from the regular VARO said that the only way to clear it up is to go to the Education office. Lucky for us, it's only 600 miles round trip... It could be a lot farther, because there are only 4 offices that handle DEA in the whole country. And there isn't even a phone number to call to make an appointment.

What a great way to discourage vets from trying to get their due benefits....

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the replies, everyone. I'm sorry to see that my daughter isn't the only one going through this.

Yep, we know she has the choice of my retro date or the date of notification; I have the letter in front of me as I type.

My VSO said to send them a letter saying essentially "hey, pay attention! Eligibility date is 2009. That date was chosen. School verified enrollment" and that would settle it.

The VA rep from the regular VARO said that the only way to clear it up is to go to the Education office. Lucky for us, it's only 600 miles round trip... It could be a lot farther, because there are only 4 offices that handle DEA in the whole country. And there isn't even a phone number to call to make an appointment.

What a great way to discourage vets from trying to get their due benefits....

Hedgey,

Before you spend the $ for gasoline, try sending in an IRIS about this issue and also call the 1-800 line, I know, I know .... you don't always get the same answer at the 1-800 BUT all you want is a phone number. I bet most of this can be taken

care of (if needed) by FAX. Unfortunately, it doesn't happen overnight. I just went through the DEA enrollment process and today is actually Day 1 of the quarter, I started the DEA claim as soon after we received my husbands new rating and

a trip to to local community college and speaking with the VA Rep there helped out alot. She gave me a list of things to do, file the claim through VONAPP, etc. Did you daughter go to school locally ? You might start with the VA Svcs office

at the school first.

I'd tell ya not to give up but it sounds like you have no plans to.

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use