Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

2 100% Ratings

Rate this question


rapsellsr

Question

Ok, here is the deal. I started VA in 20, got 20% in 07, 100% in 08. Under Nehmer, we were just told that he is 30% from March 07, 60% from March 2010, now another 100% plus qualifies for SMC A & A (not sure if this is right). Can anyone tell me, do we get retro money or not. I am soooooo confused!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hello Rap,,,thank you for your service and welcome. Ok you got what one day I hope to get. SC... If I am correct , each time they give you and increse to your rating there is suppose to be some form of retro from the increase to that award date. If there is another increase and an award letter and date then that is suppose to be figured as well. Yes , they can easily "forget" about it and won't pay if you don't pursue, show them , and ASK for it. I have not been fortunate to have this problem but hope to one day. I believe the SMC and A and A is a separate rating with date of award payable to that increase from the date of award. I hope I read the regs and ratings correctly. Sorry I did not do the math for you but some of your ratings have me confused alittle so maybe one of the other members can punch in the numbers alittle with your increases.

I do know that the VA math of increases does NOT work off of 100 percental group for each issue. It must be figured off of your leftover available percentage. For example ...lets say you get 20 percent your first claim which leaves you only 80 percent left for the next award . Lets say you get a bump up of 60 percent from an increase that was awarded to you on an appeal for higher rating. You are suppose to take the 60 percent of the 80 percent leftover and then add it to your 20 percent. So it should be something like this....80 percent with the 60 = 48 percent and add the 20 so that would be 68 percent. Another award would come off the 68 percent and so forth , meaning each award actually gets taken from a dwindling percentage. I hope this is correct if I am reading the rating regs correct. It is confusing especially with secondary disease/injury awards. They are not going to let you add these to each rating as if they used 100 percent each time. This is why the rating awards are so confusing and very easy for the VA to make a mistake in the amounts. Its only VA math , and not what you or I were taught in school.

Oh yes if the VA makes a mistake , normally you have to point it out to them, prove it and ASK for the corrected version. And this usually triggers an appeal somewhere to the process , whether your at RO or even thru the BVA and that takes time. I know , if they would have done it right the first time it would have saved tax dollars but I guess that the VA does not count on everyone doing the math correctly so they will just not catch the mistake and let it alone , resulting in huge "secret" savings. But websites like this have trimmed the VA's "secret savings" and made more Veterans aware of the award , ratings , Early effective dates , meaning more people having to watch the VA and their "poor math skills" There are others here that can tell some real horror stories to this. I am waiting for the day that I have someone in the VA, BVA , or CAVA that will trigger the rating schedule so that I can try and do this ridiculous math and figure out what the VA really owes me.

I hope someone else can eloborate alittle more and correct me if I am wrong. At any event welcome and please remember that whatever you do .....NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Rap,,,thank you for your service and welcome. Ok you got what one day I hope to get. SC... If I am correct , each time they give you and increse to your rating there is suppose to be some form of retro from the increase to that award date. If there is another increase and an award letter and date then that is suppose to be figured as well. Yes , they can easily "forget" about it and won't pay if you don't pursue, show them , and ASK for it. I have not been fortunate to have this problem but hope to one day. I believe the SMC and A and A is a separate rating with date of award payable to that increase from the date of award. I hope I read the regs and ratings correctly. Sorry I did not do the math for you but some of your ratings have me confused alittle so maybe one of the other members can punch in the numbers alittle with your increases.

I do know that the VA math of increases does NOT work off of 100 percental group for each issue. It must be figured off of your leftover available percentage. For example ...lets say you get 20 percent your first claim which leaves you only 80 percent left for the next award . Lets say you get a bump up of 60 percent from an increase that was awarded to you on an appeal for higher rating. You are suppose to take the 60 percent of the 80 percent leftover and then add it to your 20 percent. So it should be something like this....80 percent with the 60 = 48 percent and add the 20 so that would be 68 percent. Another award would come off the 68 percent and so forth , meaning each award actually gets taken from a dwindling percentage. I hope this is correct if I am reading the rating regs correct. It is confusing especially with secondary disease/injury awards. They are not going to let you add these to each rating as if they used 100 percent each time. This is why the rating awards are so confusing and very easy for the VA to make a mistake in the amounts. Its only VA math , and not what you or I were taught in school.

Oh yes if the VA makes a mistake , normally you have to point it out to them, prove it and ASK for the corrected version. And this usually triggers an appeal somewhere to the process , whether your at RO or even thru the BVA and that takes time. I know , if they would have done it right the first time it would have saved tax dollars but I guess that the VA does not count on everyone doing the math correctly so they will just not catch the mistake and let it alone , resulting in huge "secret" savings. But websites like this have trimmed the VA's "secret savings" and made more Veterans aware of the award , ratings , Early effective dates , meaning more people having to watch the VA and their "poor math skills" There are others here that can tell some real horror stories to this. I am waiting for the day that I have someone in the VA, BVA , or CAVA that will trigger the rating schedule so that I can try and do this ridiculous math and figure out what the VA really owes me.

I hope someone else can eloborate alittle more and correct me if I am wrong. At any event welcome and please remember that whatever you do .....NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for taking so much time on me. I will lead you to where we are not. In 06 I suffered CHF. Went to VA in Sept. 06. In 07, I received 20% for DM11. i went downhill quickly and at the end of 08, i was increased to 100% P&T (but nothing to do with the Nehmer claim. So in March, 2010, we filed for IHD under the new presumptive rules. We just found out they gave me 30% from 07; 70% from march 2010. smc from march 2010 and A&A from march 2010. So I am thoroughly confused, have no clue what to even think about what I may receive. I have not been able to work for a year and a half, so I would be so grateful for help. But I must say, the VA has always been wonderful to me. Thanks for any help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes it looks like you will be due retro. If you have at least one 60% and one 100% SMC should also be considered automatically (something that the VA tries not to do), and usually awarded. Note that the VA may use a more restrictive method to determine SMC than the law allows/provides for.

You have what is called "staged ratings". This complicates award calculations tremendously. You will need to check the award amounts and how they were figured.

There should be a case for retro award of SMC as well. This depends on how and when the various percentage became effective. Nehmer should help with SMC retroactive entitlement.

(Something else to look at, and there is a possibility that the VA (again) may not figure things correctly.)

Ok, here is the deal. I started VA in 20, got 20% in 07, 100% in 08. Under Nehmer, we were just told that he is 30% from March 07, 60% from March 2010, now another 100% plus qualifies for SMC A & A (not sure if this is right). Can anyone tell me, do we get retro money or not. I am soooooo confused!!

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use