Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.
Service Connection
Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected.
Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.
Effective Dates
Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.
Rating Issues
Continue Reading on HadIt.com-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Are all military medical records on file at the VA?
RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,
I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful. We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did. He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims. He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file. It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to 1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015. It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me. He didn't want my copies. Anyone have any information on this. Much thanks in advance.-
- 4 replies
Picked By
RichardZ, -
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
Tomahawk
So I have finally gotten around to writing up my NOD. Could some of you with more experience with this sort of thing read this over and let me know if its too much and I need to dial it back a bit, or if its okay to send as is. Thanks in advance.
Notice of Disagreement
The sleep apnea examination performed by XXXXX states "The veteran did not have any documentation of symptoms or diagnosis of sleep apnea during his military enlistment." This is false. I have in my service medical records documentation that I had difficulty sleeping. I also had problems with sinusitis which is a known issue with sleep apnea patients. To state that my service records show this as an "acute episode" is absurd. I specifically told the doctor in my exam that I had sinus problems throughout my military career. However I did not go to sick call for it as it is stigmatic to be a "sick call commando". I did what most Marines did and took over the counter medications and just dealt with it. Furthermore Dr. XXXstates that my sleep apnea is more likely than not related to the weight I have gained since being out of service. Had Dr. XXX actually examined my medical records he would have known this directly connects my sleep apnea do my current service connected disability. The plethora of medications I have been given over the years for my disability including Gabapentin, Amytriptyline, Naproxen, and Pregabalin all have weight gain listed as a side effect. Couple this fact with my inability to properly exercise due to my SC disability is more than a preponderance of evidence to resolve any reasonable doubt that my SC disability at least as likely contributes to the aggravation of my sleep apnea. On top of my SC disability having a major impact on my weight gain, the current medications I am on also exacerbate my sleep apnea. Currently the medications I take for my SC disability are Hydrocodone, Zolpidem Tartrate, Cyclobenzaprine, and Etodolac. All of these medications have an adverse effect on me in regards to my sleep apnea. In addition to these connections, my SC disability prevents me from sleeping any other way than on my back which also causes sleep apnea to be worse. Proof of this fact can be seen in the video taken by the VA while I was having my sleep study. The technician assured me that everyone moves positions in their sleep and that I would at some point move from my back whether I knew it or not. Upon waking from my sleep study the technician laughed and stated he has never seen anyone not move during a sleep study, and that I was the first. The reason for this is that my body is conditioned not to move in order to avoid added pain from complex regional pain syndrome. All of these factors show that whether or not my sleep apnea was present during my time in service (which I believe it was) it is still aggravated by my service connected disability as well as the medications I take to alleviate pain caused by the SC disability.
Dr. XXX also examined me for Esophagus and Hiatal Hernia. In his diagnosis Dr. XXX states " Nonsteroidal antiinflammatories are not known to cause GERD…." and that other factors contributed such as "his obesity." Considering I was not obese when in service which is when the symptoms were onset (as stated in my service medical records) this conclusion is ludicrous as a "cause". Proper examination of my medical files will show that the symptoms had onset of symptoms while on active duty. Coupled with the medications I was prescribed for my service connected disability, and the disability itself are all contributing factors to my esophagitus and GERD. By default this makes the condition service connected as symptoms were onset in service. However the issue was exacerbated due to my service connected disability resulting in my need to have surgery to correct it as the medication for the GERD was not helping. Any doctor who actually reviewed my complete medical file would be able to make this correlation, and be able to state with a certainty that my esophagus with hiatal hernia was at least as likely as not caused by, or aggravated by the medications for my service connected disability, and the disability itself.
I was examined by XXXXX for my Degenerative disc disease and herniated discs. In his conclusion he states "any relationship of this to his service, left foot, is purely speculative." Again I find this preposterous. You do not have to be a doctor to know the correlation between lower back pain and an abnormal gait. "Disability that is proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disorder shall be service-connected.
38 C.F.R. § 3.310(a) (2004). Service connection will also be
granted for aggravation of a nonservice-connected condition
by a service-connected disorder, although compensation is
limited to the degree of disability (and only that degree)
over and above the degree of disability existing prior to the
aggravation. See Allen v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 439 (1995).
"
Whether or not this doctor felt the desire to "speculate" on the cause of my lower back issues, it is beyond a reasonable doubt "aggravated" by the fact that I cannot ambulate correctly with or without the use of such aides as knee and ankle braces and a cane. I have documented issues of back problems in my service medical records. I also have documented in my VA medical records issues of lower back problems specifically caused by my losing balance and falling due to my service connected left foot. Nowhere does Dr. Steurer cite viewing my medical records in his diagnosis which would have given him beyond reason of speculation to deduce that it is at least as likely as not that my service connected left knee/left foot condition caused and/or aggravates my degenerative disc disease with herniated discs. There is a preponderance of evidence available to the VA in cases very much like mine that dictates abnormal gait being at least as likely as not the cause of lower back problems. For a doctor who specializes in C&P examinations to state he cannot make that correlation without speculating tells me that he does not have the medical training required to be in that position. The fact is the my spine issues are most likely secondary to my longstanding service connected lower leg disability and the accompanying abnormal gait, which likely damaged spine due to undue and abnormal stress. It is well known that people with lower extremity orthopedic problems often have abnormal gaits and these people often rapidly develop abnormal painful spines. The abnormal forces which are secondary to the gait problems places excessive stresses across the vertebral column, which in turn damages the spine.
Dr. XXXX also examined my right foot and cited that I have "claw toes left foot and hammertoes left foot". I have neither claw nor hammer toes. This statement is clearly erroneous and has no basis in fact. Viewing of my dozens of X-rays and other imaging can prove this false. The inaccuracy of this report leads me to believe that Dr. XXX dictated his findings about a different patient into my medical records, he did not thoroughly review my medical records, or that he does not have an adequate background in podiatry to diagnose my conditions.
In the document "Statement of the Case" dated 05/09/2006 page 6 states that "The basis of disability evaluations is the ability of the body as a whole, or of the psyche, or of a system or organ of the body to function under the ordinary conditions of daily life including employment…" Based on this definition and my medical care it is beyond a doubt that my left foot does not function under ordinary conditions of daily life. Furthermore page 7 of this same document goes on to state "Disability of the musculoskeletal system is primarily the inability, due to damage or infection in parts of the system, to perform normal working movements of the body with normal excursion, strength, speed, coordination, and endurance…" Considering I have not been able to run since being discharged from service, and my condition has gotten progressively worse with time to the point that I cannot ambulate without the aid of braces, inserts, and a cane I would beyond a doubt state that my left foot does not perform normal working movements with normal excursion, strength, speed, coordination, nor endurance. Thus by the VA's legal definition I have functional loss of use of my left foot. This is shown via the multiple Pain Management, and Podiatry appointments I have had throughout the years. There is documented in my VA medical records limited and painful motion, as well as evidence of disuse and atrophy. This should prove that I meet the criteria for functional loss of use of that foot with a rating of 40% which is the maximum for the loss of use of that appendage.
The VCAA dictates that the VA is required to assist a veteran in obtaining evidence necessary to substantiate a claim. Based on the incompetence of the doctors that examined me I feel that the VA has failed in its duty to assist. I am therefore filing this Notice of Disagreement and request a formal BVA hearing.
I am disputing that;
1.) Service Connection for RSD/CRPS of the left lower extremity should be the maximum 40% disability.
2.) Degenerative Disc Disease with herniated discs should be secondary to aggravation by SC left foot condition.
3.) Esophagus with hiatal hernia should be serviced connected with exacerbation by medication for SC left foot condition.
4.) Sleep apnea should be service connected secondary to aggravation by SC left foot and residual medications for its treatment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
2
1
Popular Days
Apr 23
6
Apr 22
2
May 12
2
Apr 24
1
Top Posters For This Question
Tomahawk 4 posts
carlie 2 posts
john999 2 posts
jbasser 1 post
Popular Days
Apr 23 2011
6 posts
Apr 22 2011
2 posts
May 12 2011
2 posts
Apr 24 2011
1 post
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now