Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Earlier Effective Date For Tdiu

Rate this question


BlakePaigeStone

Question

I just saw ...yesterday, (on the VA's eBenefits web-site), that my claim has been moved, from the 'decision-phase,' to the 'closed-phase.' Is it unusual for a claim to skip the 'notification-phase?' Is this an indication of anything 'negative?'

I filed the claim on May 20, 2010; and ...it was for an award of retro-active TDIU benefits ...due to CUE. I've been rated at '70%/TDIU' ...for PTSD, since 2002. I was service-connected in 1995, at 30% ...however, I received all of my ratings at the same time ...in 2002. So, the VA rated me from 1995, to 2002, at 30%; then, raised/increased my rating to 70% in 2002 ...plus, awarded me TDIU - P&T. This was all done at the very same time; and ...I received everything in the very same envelope ...in May, 2002.

I claimed that the CUE was made because of all of the 'informal claims' for TDIU, that were ignored, between 1995 and 2002; including my VA Medical Center doctor's diagnosis, (inpatient PTSD program), of 'PTSD-Chronic - w/Unemployable' ...upon my discharge from the hospital, in December of 1995.

I claimed CUE since the claim had been 'closed' since June of 2003. However, the regional office followed-up with a request for me to complete a 'TDIU form,' and send it back. So, the CUE issue was by-passed ...right?! Could they have re-opened my old claim ...because of 'new and material evidence' ...instead? I was also awarded SSDI, very shortly after my VA award.

Does this smell like it could result in 'bad news' for me ...when I get my decision, in a couple of weeks? Does it look like I should prepare for an appeal?

Will '...anyone,' please advise. Thank you!

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a lawyer to review your CUE. If you can find a lawyer who will take your claim you are headed for the BVA/Court of veterans appeals. If you just send this up without some expert doing research and a brief your claim is going to languish for a few years and then be dismissed. The VA does not even mention your "PTSD/unemployable" diagnosis. Did they have that record before them when they made the initial rating back in 1995? When you get your C-File and look at the decision it would be important to find out if they had that evidence, but just chose to ignore it. Be aware that you do have an uphill battle. You really have two things you must show were made in error: 1. Your rating of 30% was an error. You should have been rated at least 70%. 2. You had an inferred claim for TDIU because of that rating error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get a lawyer to review your CUE. If you can find a lawyer who will take your claim you are headed for the BVA/Court of veterans appeals. If you just send this up without some expert doing research and a brief your claim is going to languish for a few years and then be dismissed. The VA does not even mention your "PTSD/unemployable" diagnosis. Did they have that record before them when they made the initial rating back in 1995? When you get your C-File and look at the decision it would be important to find out if they had that evidence, but just chose to ignore it. Be aware that you do have an uphill battle. You really have two things you must show were made in error: 1. Your rating of 30% was an error. You should have been rated at least 70%. 2. You had an inferred claim for TDIU because of that rating error.

Thanks ...for all of your input.

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a pending claim filed, currently, for a copy of my c-file; as ...its effective date is September, 2010. I don't know if I'll ever get a copy, though; because ...it was over two-folders in size, when I last saw it at my C&P exam, in 2001/2002.

Just for the record - a request for a copy of one's c-file - is not a claim, it is a FOIA request.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember right, sometime in the mid 90's, there was an amendment

to the regulations in the rating criteria for mental health disorders.

You posted something to the effect that (in something that sounds like your hospital discharge summary)

the doctor wrote the word's "chronic" and "unemployability".

The VBA decision maker may have made a poor decision in adjudication and weighed this evidence as merely isolated findings.

Also, I haven't seen anything posted yet, showing that this doctor wrote anything at all in regards to medical rationale, that would

provide support to the portion,in relation to unemployability.

Claimants can surely have evidence in their c-files that MIGHT get adjudicated as an informal claim

and I believe only VBA can infer a claim issue.

Without having anything posted yet verbatim from prior decisions, I am in agreement with Hoppy

that conjecture and I will add this is all nothing more than mere speculation at this point.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just for the record - a request for a copy of one's c-file - is not a claim, it is a FOIA request.

Yes, I thought so ...too; but ...the 'eBenefits web-site' has my F.O.I.A. request listed as... another 'claim,' that is currently in the development-phase. When the VA replies to me, about my C-file request ...via the IRIS system, they always say that my F.O.I.A. 'claim' is being processed, etc.

Thanks for your input.

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I remember right, sometime in the mid 90's, there was an amendment

to the regulations in the rating criteria for mental health disorders.

You posted something to the effect that (in something that sounds like your hospital discharge summary)

the doctor wrote the word's "chronic" and "unemployability".

The VBA decision maker may have made a poor decision in adjudication and weighed this evidence as merely isolated findings.

Also, I haven't seen anything posted yet, showing that this doctor wrote anything at all in regards to medical rationale, that would

provide support to the portion,in relation to unemployability.

Claimants can surely have evidence in their c-files that MIGHT get adjudicated as an informal claim

and I believe only VBA can infer a claim issue.

Without having anything posted yet verbatim from prior decisions, I am in agreement with Hoppy

that conjecture and I will add this is all nothing more than mere speculation at this point.

JMHO

I totally agree. I do, however, remember carrying around a copy of my doctor's discharge summary/report, right after my discharge ...in 1995; and ...reading a copy of it that was in my C-file, during the time that I was fighting for my initial rating of service-connection.

I used to possess a copy of my C-file; but ...many moves & relocations, across the globe, designated my big, two-volume, (at that time), to the trash-heap ...somewhere. One's mental-state when you finally receive that grant of service-connection and retro-check, after a seven-year fight with the VA, makes you execute some very stupid decisions! (like not ever expecting to have to deal, with the VA ...ever again!) As I mentioned, previously '...if I'd been in my right mind, I would have appealed the rating decision ...then!' I was too ...mentally drained, and afraid ...that I'd lose it! Crazy ...huh?!

The last message from the VARO-Honolulu, about my C-file request ...last-week, was... 'that I'd be receiving it within the next 60-to-90 days.' That's where all my ammunition is located; and ...I'm sure that much has been overlooked. I, on the other-hand, 'lived' that paperwork, and ...know exactly what, in my C-file, I'm looking for. I was also informed that my C-file is now three-volumes in size; and ...will be shipped to me, via Fed-X, ('my' expense ...I'm sure), due to my U.S. Embassy FPO mail-system restrictions on weight.

Taking possession of my C-file ...will resolve all of the issues I'm now encountering. *"Never discard your C-file!!!"*

Thanks for all of your input; and ...please stay in-touch ...ok?!

"Sonny" E. T. English - Vietnam Veteran 70-71
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use