Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question About Scars

Rate this question


quidproquo

Question

I looked through the CFR, but I am not sure about something. Do scars have to be a certain size AND be painful/unstable for a rating? The way I understood it, it seemed as if they either had to be a few inches in size OR be unstable OR be painful. Is that wrong?

The VA sent me to a C&P exam recently (without me asking believe it or not) because they saw that I had scars secondary to a SC condition. I have a 1.5 inch scar and four 2ish centimeter scars, which the VA described as secondary to a SC issue. The Dr. said "oh, they average about 2 centimeters", which I guess is accurate except for the bigger one. He did say that he was writing that they are all painful and unstable. I'm having trouble believing that I could possibly get 30% for 5 weee little scars that hurt and never seem to heal. Did I misunderstand the CFR? Thx

Edited by quidproquo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
On 5/11/2011 at 4:31 AM, Berta said:

The rating criteria for scars changed in 2008 and this 2010 BVA decision includes the newer criteria:

 

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files5/1040791.txt

 

If you have scars at a ratable level due to any SC condition, you should claim them and be properly compensated for them.

I had 20% for scars from prior knee surgery's on the same knee on 2009 and after my total  knee replacement on 12/30/2016 the VA took the 20% away and award me 0% because scars are covered in the knee replacement, I should have been rated 60% but the VA still has me at 40% The VSO said she has been seeing allot of this going on in the VA so she want me to file another claim just for scars alone for the knee since I just had another total knee replacement on the same knee this time the scar is 15 inches long and it took 67 staples to close the scar up, right now the scar it 1/2 inches wide and 15 inches long my knee looks like Frankenstein worked on me, lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rating criteria for scars changed in 2008 and this 2010 BVA decision includes the newer criteria:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files5/1040791.txt

If you have scars at a ratable level due to any SC condition, you should claim them and be properly compensated for them.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was awarded 10% in Feb 2011 on my initial claim for a scar that I received back in 1992. I received a deep laceration on my right pinky finger from a field excercise. It still hurt to touch, i was told the laceration did not heal correctly and that is the reason for the raised skin and the discoloration.

vet2010

August 1990 - October 2010... 20 yrs, 2 months and 2 days exact....

Mathew 18:20 KJV

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you have a scar on your face that disfigures you that would be ratable. You could probably build TDIU out of that if the scar was large on the face. I know burn scars disfigure a person and might make it impossible to get a job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have three rated scars. Two about 15" on each hip and one 9" on my knee. they are healed and look OK but are a little painful to the touch.

I am rated at 10% for each one. The C&P doctor just asked if they hurt and measured them, writing down the lengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use