Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Does This Mean ?

Rate this question


jlshand

Question

Berta or anyone. I got my award letter today and I am qualified for I.U as far as the numbers are concerned. They didnt include forms to apply for I.U but I know I can get them easily enough. My question has to do with the following. In the part of the letter where they are explaining their decision point by point, when they come to number 8 "Entitlement to individual unemployability" It reads " the issue of whether or not the veteran is entitled to Individual Unemployability is deferred for the following: veteran's claim assistance letter.

Anybody know specifically what is meant by "veterans claims assistance letter" ?????

I have been SSDI for heart problems the VA agrees are DM11 caused, so I havent worked in four years. Seems like the I.U should be a slam dunk but this terminology "veterans claims assistance letter" has me confused.

I also thought I'd read that when you are at a certain disability level as they have granted, they are required to suggest what other help you may be qualified for (as in I.U) but no mention or forms other than the number 8 refferred above.

Thanks

Edited by jlshand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

jlshand-the VCAA regs require that the VA send claimants-in most cases- but not all-

a VCAA letter-

I have never got one but they promised me I would get some-last year- my claim went out of the rating board and is with a Coach/supervisor- almost done- no VCAA letter yet-I dont expect one now.

My local VARO is way behind in sending out these letters-

There are remands at the BVA because,among other reasons, the veteran never got one-

The VCAA letter is supposed to be tailored to the specific claim-and to tell the veteran what they need-

If the evidence is sufficient to award, they usually dont send a VCAA letter-

In your case- it sounds like- since they dont have the formal TDIU yet-they are developing the VCAA letter-

but I think these letters are often one more way to stall and get out of making a claim decision at the VARos.

Did they list as evidence your SSA award?

Actually I am baffled that- it appears they do not need to send you a VCAA letter-yet they should have sent you a TDIU form.

A VCAA letter should be specific and tell the veteran what the claim is lacking-such as federal records they are not able to attain-

I am assuming they have gotten your SSA records by now-

I would check with the 800# of you dont get this letter soon-it might show on the COVERS screen-

then again -they could award the TDIU and you wont get the letter-

Is there anything they mentioned in the award letter that would indicate they need more info for TDIU?

Berta

(PS_ I think is sucks that these letters are not being sent to the claimant right from the git go-the claimant waits month after month and gets denied and then still has no clue what they need)-

there are many claims on remand at the BVA to show what I mean like:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files1/0601194.txt

"A preliminary review of the claims file does not indicate the

veteran was properly advised of the changes brought about by

the VCAA regarding his claim for a higher rating for his

PTSD. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5102, 5103, 5103A, and 5107. The

RO failed to explain the type of information and evidence

necessary to substantiate this claim. Furthermore, although

the RO provided a copy of some of the regulations

implementing the VCAA in the January 2003 statement of the

case (SOC), the RO failed to provide the veteran with an

adequate explanation of the provisions of the VCAA, including

notice of his rights and responsibilities under this law and

whose ultimate responsibility - his or VA's, it is in

obtaining the supporting evidence. And mere notification of

the provisions of the VCAA, without a discussion of his

rights and responsibilities, VA's responsibilities, and the

necessary evidence to be obtained with regard to the specific

issue before the Board is insufficient for purposes of

compliance with the VCAA. See Charles v. Principi, 16

Vet. App. 370, 373-74 (2002).

As a consequence, the veteran's claim was certified to the

Board without him being given appropriate notice of the

evidence necessary to substantiate his claim, his rights and

responsibilities under the VCAA, and VA's responsibilities

under this law. See Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 183

(2002) (failure by the BVA to enforce compliance with the

requirements of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) for the VA to inform a

claimant of the information or evidence necessary to

substantiate a claim, as well as to inform a claimant of

which evidence the VA will seek to provide and which evidence

the claimant is to provide, is remandable error). Thus, a

VCAA letter must be issued to correct this procedural due

process problem before the Board can decide the case. And

the Board, itself, cannot correct this procedural due process

deficiency; rather, the RO must. See Disabled American

Veterans (DAV) v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 327 F.3d

1339 (Fed. Cir. 2003). "

Like I said- a fully substantiated claim might get a mention of a VCAA letter that is coming but the VARO might not need to send one-

this VCAA crapola is becoming one of my biggest areas of disgust wth the VA-

This vet above was represented by the American Legion- why aren't these service officers taking a stand when the vet does not get a VCAA letter yet gets denied at the VARO level?

The VAROS are just skimming through fast as they can to get an end product 930 code-

They are npt taking the time to read our claims and develop the VCAA early on in the claims process to tell the vet what they need-

I do not know the CUE potential of VCAA but it probably falls under DTA regs- therefore not Cue able- but it is a legal failure to the detriment of claimants like the above veteran in the BVA decision-to wait and wait for a denial that could have been averted with a VCAA letter.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest DON20906

You should get a letter from VA with 10-12 pages of boilerplate. At the bottom of the stack should be a VCAA Notice Response Form that gives you the option to have your case abeyed for 60-days to give you the opportunity to develop and submit additional evidence. You may also waive the 60-days and tell VA to proceed with your claim. If you do nothing VA will sit on your claim for the 60 days anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Berta, thanks for the quick reponse.

1. No mention whatsover of my status with SSDI despite this info being "all over" my application.

2. They included a form for vocational rehabilitation but not for TDUI. Why, I cant begin to say. I havent been able to work since my SSDI in December of 2000!!!!!

3. No other mention in the awards letter of info they might need related to a TDUI claim

4. The claim date they are using is August 19, 2005 , despite the fact that I have in my hands right now a stamped acknowledgement (Copy) of the letter alerting them to my intended claime which i hand carried to the VARO on June 18, 2005!!!!!!!!!!

So as I understand it this VCAA letter or package which defers any TDUI business is something else I need to get from them in order to pursue the TDUI?????

jlshand-the VCAA regs require that the VA send claimants-in most cases- but not all-

a VCAA letter-

I have never got one but they promised me I would get some-last year- my claim went out of the rating board and is with a Coach/supervisor- almost done- no VCAA letter yet-I dont expect one now.

My local VARO is way behind in sending out these letters-

There are remands at the BVA because,among other reasons, the veteran never got one-

The VCAA letter is supposed to be tailored to the specific claim-and to tell the veteran what they need-

If the evidence is sufficient to award, they usually dont send a VCAA letter-

In your case- it sounds like- since they dont have the formal TDIU yet-they are developing the VCAA letter-

but I think these letters are often one more way to stall and get out of making a claim decision at the VARos.

Did they list as evidence your SSA award?

Actually I am baffled that- it appears they do not need to send you a VCAA letter-yet they should have sent you a TDIU form.

A VCAA letter should be specific and tell the veteran what the claim is lacking-such as federal records they are not able to attain-

I am assuming they have gotten your SSA records by now-

I would check with the 800# of you dont get this letter soon-it might show on the COVERS screen-

then again -they could award the TDIU and you wont get the letter-

Is there anything they mentioned in the award letter that would indicate they need more info for TDIU?

Berta

(PS_ I think is sucks that these letters are not being sent to the claimant right from the git go-the claimant waits month after month and gets denied and then still has no clue what they need)-

there are many claims on remand at the BVA to show what I mean like:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files1/0601194.txt

"A preliminary review of the claims file does not indicate the

veteran was properly advised of the changes brought about by

the VCAA regarding his claim for a higher rating for his

PTSD. See 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 5102, 5103, 5103A, and 5107. The

RO failed to explain the type of information and evidence

necessary to substantiate this claim. Furthermore, although

the RO provided a copy of some of the regulations

implementing the VCAA in the January 2003 statement of the

case (SOC), the RO failed to provide the veteran with an

adequate explanation of the provisions of the VCAA, including

notice of his rights and responsibilities under this law and

whose ultimate responsibility - his or VA's, it is in

obtaining the supporting evidence. And mere notification of

the provisions of the VCAA, without a discussion of his

rights and responsibilities, VA's responsibilities, and the

necessary evidence to be obtained with regard to the specific

issue before the Board is insufficient for purposes of

compliance with the VCAA. See Charles v. Principi, 16

Vet. App. 370, 373-74 (2002).

As a consequence, the veteran's claim was certified to the

Board without him being given appropriate notice of the

evidence necessary to substantiate his claim, his rights and

responsibilities under the VCAA, and VA's responsibilities

under this law. See Quartuccio v. Principi, 16 Vet. App. 183

(2002) (failure by the BVA to enforce compliance with the

requirements of 38 U.S.C.A. § 5103(a) for the VA to inform a

claimant of the information or evidence necessary to

substantiate a claim, as well as to inform a claimant of

which evidence the VA will seek to provide and which evidence

the claimant is to provide, is remandable error). Thus, a

VCAA letter must be issued to correct this procedural due

process problem before the Board can decide the case. And

the Board, itself, cannot correct this procedural due process

deficiency; rather, the RO must. See Disabled American

Veterans (DAV) v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 327 F.3d

1339 (Fed. Cir. 2003). "

Like I said- a fully substantiated claim might get a mention of a VCAA letter that is coming but the VARO might not need to send one-

this VCAA crapola is becoming one of my biggest areas of disgust wth the VA-

This vet above was represented by the American Legion- why aren't these service officers taking a stand when the vet does not get a VCAA letter yet gets denied at the VARO level?

The VAROS are just skimming through fast as they can to get an end product 930 code-

They are npt taking the time to read our claims and develop the VCAA early on in the claims process to tell the vet what they need-

I do not know the CUE potential of VCAA but it probably falls under DTA regs- therefore not Cue able- but it is a legal failure to the detriment of claimants like the above veteran in the BVA decision-to wait and wait for a denial that could have been averted with a VCAA letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BOY!

been there done that with SSA evidence-

If the SSA award is for the same conditions that you are SCed for- they cannot ignore that critical evidence!

That's good- they know you get it but have not gotten your SSA records yet?

I would-if I were you- send them the SSA award, ask them to get those records, and attach a TDIU form to it-refer to this all in a NOD-

I am thinking however- hope others chime in-

this to me is a case where a Request for Reconsideration might get this resolved faster? with the evidence above attached to it?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee,

What a pain in the B!!!!! Can't I just go to the VARO personally, see someone in the right department and hand deliver both the SSDI Award letter copy, application for TDUI and the letter they stamped acknowledging the earlier claim date???/

I'm not actually disputing the rating (except for the claim date which has to be just an oversight) Surely I dont have to file a NOD just to get them to correct the claim date to the date on my informal claim letter. Do I???

When you say request for reconsideration is that different from a NOD ?

BOY!

been there done that with SSA evidence-

If the SSA award is for the same conditions that you are SCed for- they cannot ignore that critical evidence!

That's good- they know you get it but have not gotten your SSA records yet?

I would-if I were you- send them the SSA award, ask them to get those records, and attach a TDIU form to it-refer to this all in a NOD-

I am thinking however- hope others chime in-

this to me is a case where a Request for Reconsideration might get this resolved faster? with the evidence above attached to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only my opinion. Anytime you are in a position that you can personally take any info you have on your claim personally to the RO, you are much better off doing so. If you mail it in, it can sit in the mailroom forever before it is sent to the intended area. There is tons of mail which, I have been told, that comes into the RO everyday that someone has to sort through. Imagine the time it takes and the lag time in getting your info where you need it to go. Another way to slow your claim process up. Again, I would personally take it to the RO if at all possible.

We have gone to the RO before and told them we had questions on my husbands claim and needed to speak to someone on it. When we gave them information which needed to be included in his claim, they took the information and said that they would take it straight upstairs and give it to the person working my husbands claim. They also answered any questions we had. Did this help in anyway? Don't know, but I can't see where it hurt either.

mssoup1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use