Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Qtc Appointment Weight Of Dr Statement

Rate this question


Scott D

Question

I had an appointment with QTC yesterday to evaluate conditions that have worsened. How much weight does the QTC physician have? If he states that the symptoms have indeed worsened, is that all that is needed? Can the rating officer ignore his recommendation? I am a little concerned that I have switched insurance companies multiple times over the last three years, and I do not have any continuity in care and I do not want that to affect the outcome.

Thanks

Scott

Edited by Scott D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA gives the C&P exam too much weight. If your QTC doctor says you are worse the VA will probably go along with that, but it really helps to have your own medical records to show that you are getting worse. If you think of a scale you want the weight of your positive evidence to hit the ground. You don't want to depend on benefit of doubt. Time is your enemy. If a claim has to go into appeals the years will roll by while you wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Get a copy of your C and P exam. Read it carefully. Note especially:

1 Did this doc give you a nexus? (Vetrans condition is at least as likely as not due to ....condition from military service)

2. Was the doc qualified and did he list his qualifications? He needs to have experience in the condtion for which he gave you a C and P exam.

3. Did he say he reviewed your medical records?

These are all good things to know. You can "attack" a defective C and P exam, especially on items 2 and 3, but, you probably dont want to do that if he gave you a nexus and favorable C and P exam. You attack NEGATIVE evidence, and the VA will have to try to attack favorable evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DR didn't seem too interested in conducting much of an exam. He was very interested in discussing my condition, Eosinophillic Esophagitis and how it had been or could be treated. We talked extensively about food allergies and the effect on the stricture. The food allergies were deemed not service connected by the VA a few years ago. In the end I wanted to concentrate on how symptoms have worsened and he said don't worry it is pretty clear they are much worse. I wasn't sure how to take this.

The EE had been service connected at 10% previously as a esophagus stricture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get a copy of the exam, read it and see what he wrote...then you know how to fight it and what areas to fight if it is not done in a manner to increase your award. Especially if your disability has increased.

The DR didn't seem too interested in conducting much of an exam. He was very interested in discussing my condition, Eosinophillic Esophagitis and how it had been or could be treated. We talked extensively about food allergies and the effect on the stricture. The food allergies were deemed not service connected by the VA a few years ago. In the end I wanted to concentrate on how symptoms have worsened and he said don't worry it is pretty clear they are much worse. I wasn't sure how to take this.

The EE had been service connected at 10% previously as a esophagus stricture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the C&P turned out in your favor, but never take that for granted. Do exactly what everyone below suggested, get a copy of the C&P and read it carefully. Some examiners will tell you the good points while neglecting to mention the not so good points. For instance, yes they have worsen but have they worsen enough to qualify for a higher rating according to the guidelines.

Edited by cooter

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an appointment with QTC yesterday to evaluate conditions that have worsened. How much weight does the QTC physician have? If he states that the symptoms have indeed worsened, is that all that is needed? Can the rating officer ignore his recommendation?

Scott,

Your C&P exam was for the worsening of an already SC'd disability,

this would be a claim for increase.

Hopefully the examiner states more than "the symptoms have worsened".

The examiner needs to state something as to how the disability is currently effecting you.

to the schedule.

A post further up in the thread says "The EE had been service connected at 10% previously as a esophagus stricture."

I can not find a 10 % evaluation in the rating criteria for this corresponding Diagnostic Code.

Below is the criteria for percentage levels of compensation, for DC 7203 - Esophagus, stricture of:

7203 Esophagus, stricture of:

Permitting passage of liquids only, with marked

impairment of general health ............................ 80

Severe, permitting liquids only ............................. 50

Moderate .............................................................. 30

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2009/julqtr/pdf/38cfr4.114.pdf

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use