Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can It Work

Rate this question


cooter

Question

With all the posting lately on EED's I have a question regarding my son. He served from "93-97". In "03" he began chemotherapy for colon cancer. In "04" he had surgery and put a claim in for colon cancer due to depleted Uranium and was denied. In "09" reopened his claim saying it was caused by unknown etiology and was granted in Aug. 2010 for 100%P&T. His EED was in "09" when he reopened the claim. Could it be possible to have the EED back to "03" when he first started Chemo?

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

An EED of 03, the beginning of your son's chemo sounds like common sense to me. Isn't it worth a try? I'm just learning, but isn't his time running out for NOD?

Side note: sorry your son was so ill. I have two boys and can't imagine the ache for a sick child. Even when they're grown adults.

You know you have grown old when you hear your favorite song in an elevator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

When you appeal for an EED, ask for an early date as possible. However, IMHO you wont be getting 2003, but maybe 2004...that is when you first applied, but, for that you will likely need to use 3.156C missing SMR's OR find a CUE.

The reason is that N and M Evidence isnt likely to get you an earlier date..because the earliest that will be is the date you "reopen the claim for N and M".

Your best shots:

1. Cue. You will have to find that one. You are not only going to need to find an error, but that error has to be both outcome determinative and based on the laws at that time.

2. 3.156C, based upon SMR's that were lost when your claim was denied, which you "found" later.

There are a few others that occassionaly work, too. As an example, if you either did not get the RO decision at all or, if the decision did not contain how to appeal. Also, if you had earlier claims for other issues, this will help. For example, are you a victim of shredding? Did the VA fail to file the required SOC or SSOC? This can keep the claim Pending.

Even a 2004 Retro could be six figures, so it is definately worth your time to research it thoroughly. If you dont have a complete copy of your C file, you should get one first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got off the phone with my son, and he mentioned there were some medical statements that wasn't considered in his 04 claim that could of made a difference in the outcome of the denial. Don't think he can file under 3.156C, due to no missing files. Maybe a CUE tho. He's going tomorrow to file his NOD. How should he write it, if he's claiming CUE. for his EED?

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If the evidence was in the hands of the VA and they chose to ignore or exclude it you file a CUE based on that fact.

If the VA had the evidence and chose to neither list it or refer to it in the decision you may have a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMHO, yes he may have a CUE, but instead of filing for a CUE, file a NOD requesting an EED. They both can get an earlier effective date but with requesting a CUE, the veteran must prove a CUE was made. Instead file a NOD requesting an EED. VA can use both 3.156 and 3.157 if medical records and his chemo record in 2003 prove the link between the conditions, VA should grant the claim. If the NOD fails to grant the EED the veteran can then file a CUE later.

Edited by pete992
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the posting lately on EED's I have a question regarding my son.

He served from "93-97".

In "03" he began chemotherapy for colon cancer.

In "04" he had surgery and put a claim in for colon cancer due to depleted Uranium and was denied.

What exactly, did the Reasons and Bases state to support the VA's denial of SC.

Also, was/is, colon cancer on a presumptive list for VA - SC - disability, that covers the

time/places, he served ?

In "09" reopened his claim saying it was caused by unknown etiology and was granted in Aug. 2010 for 100%P&T.

His EED was in "09" when he reopened the claim.

What exactly, does the Aug. 2010 Rating Decision state in the Reasons and Bases Section,

to support the VA's grant of SC/s and what is the exact disability/s that were granted ?

Also, what exactly, does it say to support their effective date provided for 09 ?

Also, what does it say to support the 100% P&T, as this might helps others in a similar situation ?

Could it be possible to have the EED back to "03" when he first started Chemo?

No way to know yet, answers are needed.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use