Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dislocating Patella & Chondromalacia

Rate this question


goin2pa

Question

While on active duty I was diagnosed with a "Dislocating Patella & Chondromalacia" in my left knee from a "broken" knee-cap. I had surgery to remove the "loose body" that was wrecking my knee (part of the cartilage from the underside of my knee-cap, re-alignment of ligaments and to clean the Mincius within my knee. In my medical record it plainly states that while completing this procedure part of my knee cartilage was removed. Although the knee is often VERY sore, and swells up – but it is considerably better than prior to surgery!

My question is - would this type of procedure normally warrant a rating under # 5259 "Cartilage, Semilunar, removal of, Symptomatic . . . . 10%" . To me, strictly with only a layman's understanding of the ratings and diagnostic codes; it sounds right – but was hoping to find out from someone who knows. The C & P doctor diagnossed it as "Degenerative Joint Desease"

Thanks in advance - Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Welcome to Hadit

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Get a real doctor to write a report for you. Was you C&P doctor even an orthopedist? See, the VA will use an eye doctor with an MD to write reports for bad knees if they work cheap. You can't diagnose yourself because the VA is just going to ignore this. You need real medical evidence to support anything you are claiming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So - even though the surgery took place while I was active duty, and the procedure is well documented and included in my medical record I’ll still need another doctor to re-diagnose my knee problem? The surgery and original diagnosis was done by a respected Orthopedic Surgeon. The cartilage under the knee-cap got broken in half while on the job, and the broken part was floating around inside the knee-joint for about 22 months tearing it up from the inside out. It would give-out, lock-up and sometimes swell to the size of a football. Although it was cleaned up, the joint will never really be "normal" as part of my cartilage was removed causing the knee-cap to wear unusually.

All in all I consider myself lucky, but what caught my attention was that the C & P doctor wrote it up as "Degenerative Joint Disease" rather than a damaged knee that was repaired.

Thanks for the reply - Jim

Get a real doctor to write a report for you. Was you C&P doctor even an orthopedist? See, the VA will use an eye doctor with an MD to write reports for bad knees if they work cheap. You can't diagnose yourself because the VA is just going to ignore this. You need real medical evidence to support anything you are claiming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The C&P examiners write reports based on what they know. My knees are pretty bad, well, really bad. The orthopedic surgeons mostly wrote, TKR due to advanced DJD. Degenerative Joint Disease is a facy name for jacked up knee. The wearing or breaking away of cartilage and the meniscus is considered a degenerative process and that is they call it that.

If the C&P examiner stated DJD, and the medical reports state part of the meniscus was removed, then yes you should get at least a 10% rating. If you have the occasional swelling and locking up, have your current doctor annotate that in their records and after your claim is complete you can file a NOD, or later an increase in rating for worsening of the condition.

Have you already received a VA award or are you waiting on one??

The fact the VA uses any examiner is pretty much true, I had an NP do a knee exam only about 3 weeks after I had the medial meniscus completely removed and a microfracture technique done and she started cranking on my knee and twisting it, man I had to yell at her, which I do fairly loudly, and she finally stopped, looked like she was going to cry. Obviously my C&P exam notes were not done very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I basicly had the same done as you, I was awarded 10% for degenerative joint disease, partial medial meniscectomy. Didn't do much good cause I ended up with TKR. So if the C&P examiner dx you with DJD, you should get at least 10% out of it.

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use