Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

I Have Lung Cancer !


mymissie

Question

I have been out of the Forum, not even reading much. Just got burned out.

But Please do not DELEATE this!!!! Want to find out if I have an 1151 CLAIM?

To get everyone up to date: On Aug 10,2011, I had Congestive heart failure,was in private hospital for about a week,where they removed about

about 3 1/2 qts of fluid/BLOOD . ALSO SAYS HAD ACCUTE KIDNEY INJURY.

ALSO WAS TOLD THAT I HAD LUNG CANCER--- ADENOCARCINOMA !!!-OPERATABLE!

IMPRESSIONS--From my Doctors.

1--FdG avid left upper lobe mask with a small avid nodule on the right upper lobe.

2-Consolidative changes in the right lung base paratracheal ,which may be inflammatory in etiology.This is mildly FDG avid.

3- FDG avidadenopathy in the right paratracheal region,precarinal space,AP windowas well as subarinal space and left hilar reguon ad described.

4- FDG avid right axillary node.

5- FDG avid supraclavicular adenopathy particullary on the right as described

6- Markes colonic diverticulosis.

I have started Chemo already,but am limited in treatment that will help-IF ANY treatment Will !

AFTER the Shock of finding I had cancer,I went and got copies of X-ray that were taken back in 2004, an found out the following:In My V.A. Radioligy Reports:: Jan.20,2004- Report status verfied:

Report: Chest: Two views of the chest with no previous film avaible, there is a streaky density noted at the level of aortic knob. Could be superimposition of shadow vs infiltrate,left upper hilar region should be considered.

Impression: Normal Heart. Could be superiorimposition of shadow although for futher evaluation. Recomend close follow-up and apical lordotic view.

Primary Doagnostic code: Major Abnormality.

Jan. 27,2004-

Chest: Two views of the chest shows bony thorax to be unremarkable for age. Mild scoliosis. The heart is normal size. There is a streaky density on the left upper region which is un-changed as conpared to the previous film.

Impression: No definite infiltrate. Streaky density left upper hilar region, unchanged as conpared to previous film. Recomend follow up study.

Primary Diagnostic code: Clinical Correlation Needed.

I was never told about this-just found out about it this past week while reading this Radiology report. THEY NEVER DID A FOLLOW-Up ON THIS !!! THEY JUST HUNG ME UP- AND WAITED FOR ME TO DIE QUITELY !!! I'm 100% Service conected disabled- to expensive to Keep on there books?

SO WHAT DO YOU'LL THINK? 1151 Claim plus a $25,000,000. Tort Claim???

Sorry for being so long winded- But I am MAD AS HELL!!@@@@@@

Please advise ME>>>

CANCER

Edited by mymissie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

YOU BET!!!!

Some lawyers might provide an IMO specialist for an opinion that could come out of the proceeds if the FTCA is successful.

Unless you can afford to get an IMO on your own.

This is as troublesome as the cancer:

"Impression: Normal Heart. Could be superiorimposition of shador although for futher evaluation. Recomend colse foloo-up and apical lordotic view.

Primary Doagnostic code: Major Abnormality."

That is real VA doubletalk and similiar to how they killed my husband.And almost killed a good friend of ours.( He gets 100% P &T plus SMC for what they did to him.)

There is plenty of info on FTCA and 1151 claims in our FTCA forum.

The offset from 1151 awards to FTCA awards is explained there.

This appears to be VA malpractice but only the med recs can reveal if it is -as well as a strong IMO from a real doctor.

Malpractice has a paper trail and even if the VA attempts to cover up malpractice, it is still revealed in the med recs- maybe very hard to find but

if in the med recs, the evidence of malpractice can be found.

6 years after I won FTCA 1151 I found evidence of an additional malpracticed condition in my husband';s med recs because my daughter, a veteran, insisted I review the records again. She was right.

I could not file FTCA or 1151 again-so I filed for direct SC death due to AO. I succeeded in the AO claim too but I had 3 IMOs this time because I was so angry at the VA when I discovered the true cause of my husband's demise.It was VERY well covered up by the VA until I found out what they ad done.

It pays to get a lawyer to word the SF 95 for the tort and this can be used for the basis of the 1151 claim too.Although these claims are distinctly separate claims.

I think in the FTCA forum I posted the way I worded the cause of action for my FTCA case.It was basically what a lawyer would have stated.

For witnesses on the SF 95 they usually mean witnesses for any vehicle accident or similiar situation on VA property as cause of action but I listed under Witnesses the names of a bunch of the quacks at 2 VAs who malpracticed against my husband.

Good luck with this and by all means hold your spirits HIGH! And keep Faith that you will overcome these medical problems!

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sent a request to Archuleta,Alsaffar, & Higginbotham Law Fiim last Thursday. Hope I hear from them SOON!

Thanks Berta,everyone!

Edited by mymissie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1151 claims can take quite some time.

My FTCA case took a little over 2 years but the 1151 claim was actually denied Even when I sent the VA the settlement papers and contact info from the OGC lawyers.VA doesnt settle unless the OGC has found evidence of malpractice. VARO Buffalo as usual ignored that info.I got right on the phone to OGC and then the VARO sent me the award letter almost 3 years after I f9iled the claim.

Funny thing is - the US of A is the entity you settle with-but the USA maintains no admission of malpractice in the settlement papers.

The award letter under 1151 sure did though.

I was able to get the internal OGC documents and peer review stuff after I settled and VA signed off.

Those documents were horrible.

My 1151 DIC was offset by my settlement for over 10 years.

On the books the VA would account for it and then substract it from the FTCA award.

Anyone can attempt to do what I also did- but I found no case like mine and neither NVLSP knew of any-still this can be done-

if a veteran or widow is awarded 1151 and FTCA for a non SC condition-they can also try to prove the 1151 issue should also be direct SC (and then they get the offset back)

My claim for that took 7 years but that can work.

1151 DIC for NSC death by VA -

2010 award for death due to AO trumping 1151 and FTCA offset.

AGain I had to pressure the OGC to get the RO to pay me. And they did.

The offset for FTCA only regards the 1151/FTCA disability.

VA fights both FTCA and 1151 claims aggressively.

I had no lawyer and dealt with OGC directly.

My FTCA case was by far easier in many respects then any of my RO level claims.

I liked the OGC lawyers. They are tough as nails but know VA case law in and out (unlike RO raters)

and although they diligently tried to knock down my case, they couldn't as my evidence was so strong.

Having a lawyer however would have saved me a lot of time and research and stress.I dont recommend filing FTCA without a lawyer.

Sometimes what appears on the surface as malpractice -isnt.

and then there are situations where the veteran has definitely been victimized by VA malpractice but they don't know it until someone gives their med recs a full review.

I used my FTCA internal documents for my additional AO DMII claim and for my pending AO IHD claim.

They never release this stuff until after a settlement is made.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use