Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Opinion

Rate this question


Rob m

Question

Just wondering if I made my point clear. I'm hoping for an increase, guess I'll have to wait and see.

Thanks

Veteran received a rating decision dated 26 JULY 2011. Veteran disagrees with the 30% award for chronic migraine headaches and the 0% rating for exotropia with poor convergence, visual tracking and ocular alignment due to traumatic brain injury. Veteran requests a Decision Review Officer (DRO) reconsideration for the maximum allowed by law. Please consider this letter to be an official "Notice of Disagreement" (NOD).

Reasons

Chronic migraine headaches- C&P exam 04 and 24 May 2011 shows complaints of headaches 2 to 3 times per week lasting several hours to 2 or 3 days with the episodes incapacitating 10 hours per week. Veteran currently takes at least 4 different medications for this condition. Title code 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations assigns a 50% rating when migraine headaches are very frequent and completely prostrating.

Veteran experiences chronic headaches 2 to 3 times per week lasting up to several days since Aug 1993 (reference members service medical records) this qualifies as very frequent. C&P exam states veteran is incapacitated 10 hours per week. While the C&P exam does not use the word "Prostrating" (uses incapacitating), veteran is unable to perform assigned duties and meets the criteria of prostrating. Veteran current works as a fire inspector and is assigned a permanent bed (fire dept bunk). This fire dept bunk is used when the member does not go home sick or is unable to function. If it was not for this specialty job, it would very difficult the veteran to keep and maintain gainful employment.

Exotropia with poor convergence, visual tracking and ocular alignment due to traumatic brain injury-

This disability is not specifically listed in the rating schedule, therefore, it is rated analogous to a disability in which not only the function affected, but anatomical localization and symptoms are closely related.

C&P exam 24 May 2011 states exotropia with poor convergence, visual tracking and ocular alignment is directly related to veterans traumatic brain injury (TBI). Title code 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations states a higher rating will be assigned if there is visual impairment due to this condition.

Please review veterans service medical records. Veteran's chronic symptoms include blurred vision, double vision, inability/problems reading, occasional vision loss and photophobia.

Please reconsider previous ratings

Thank You

Edited by Rob m
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I think you made your points here very well.

I always feel that the NOD is the first line of attack so why not tell them -in the NOD- exactly why their rating was wrong,using the VA schedule of ratings and the med recs-as you have done.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You don't want to mix the words "reconsideration" and "NOD" in the same statement since they mean things quite different. Anyway, now you can get some more evidence to support a higher rating. Most of us win these things step-by-step.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Rob,

It looks as if you have provided good info that the VA needs to re-check. Do you have any new documents you can bring to their attention?

Have you checked your C-file as to what info they already have?

Can you refer them to specific outside opinions or documents or progress notes to give more evidence?

Take a look at my website (signature below), Step 8 as well as the whole site. Maybe something in it can give you added ideas.

you want to make it so the VA has no wiggle room so the more you can provide, the better off you are.

Since the VA is a very busy organization, I feel the more info that is listed, the less they have to hunt to try to find and instead just look up and read.

I do wish you good journey.

fanaticbooks

www.howtoassemblevaclaims.com

A free guide for researching, organizing and assembling a va claim. Now upgraded to include suggestions for VONAPP and Social Security Disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use