Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Drug Company Reps Visiting Va Doctors

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

First of all, this is not in a VA run facility. This is a contract VA clinic run by a Contract Healthcare Corporation, out here in the boonies.

I have seen with my own eyes the glamor-puss drug reps coming in & out of the clinic, with their little wheelie suitcases in tow.

I'd seen this before, at my old private doctor's office, many times over the years. His nurse told me that Ol' Doc Smith made a good living off the perks - trips, gifts, coupons that were essentially cashed in for ... cash. She told me that the Reps came in, gave him a truck load of goodies and in turn, he wrote scripts for their drugs. Mind you, he would only write the scripts if he thought the drugs would be effective, but the more he wrote for, say, effexor, the more goodies he got from Merck (might be a different pharma, but you get the picture).

(I once ran into the local AARP head who had a petition for over-50's to sign for our congressman to force Pharmaceuticals to release information on perks given to doctors in exchange for scripts written. It never happened, or not to my knowledge.)

I've never seen a drug rep at the VAMC, and I never saw one when our clinic was run by the VA directly. But I've been seeing them lately. I asked another vet and was he said that since Valor was a contractor, drug reps could certainly come in and peddle their drugs to the doctors.

So I asked my VA therapist about this. He groaned and shook his head and said he couldn't understand why the VA would allow it. But it might explain why my DH's Contract Healthcare psychiatrist insisted on giving him two newer medications (that both made him sick and/or loopy) and refused to let DH try the older meds that his therapist told him he was likely to get. Flat out refused to change his meds to anything else, mine or any others. Told DH if he wouldn't take the meds he prescribed and felt he was in crisis, go to the emergency room. What is up with that? I never heard of a psychiatrist or any doctor who wouldn't allow a patient to stop meds that made them feel ill.

I know, this psychiatrist is cheerfully writing in his notes that DH is uncooperative and refuses medication. Luckily, DH's therapist is part of a special Rural Healthcare Clinic and DH will be able to see their psychiatrist shortly - one who actually works for the VA, not a contractor.

But back to the main question. How is okay that Drug Reps are being allowed access to doctors who write scripts for veterans? Why is the VA allowing doctors who treat veterans to be influenced by Drug Companies? This can't be right. I know there's influencing going on, because when you go into the individual examining rooms, you see the Paxil note pads, the Enberel coffee cups, etc. (I can't remember the exact names I've seen, but you know what I mean. Goodies from the Reps.).

You know the Drug companies aren't giving anything away for nothing. I heard from someone who no longer works there (complete gossip, hearsay) that at least one of the doctors there is making a nice little part-time income from them.

So what do I do? Am I right to be outraged? Am I just freakin' paranoid, as usual?

Edited to Add:

Well I googled and I found this instructional essay for Drug Reps interested in selling to the VA. So at least there are limits to what they can give VA doctors located in real facilities. Limited.

http://pharmrep.findpharma.com/pharmrep/Selling+to+Physicians/A-different-world/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/316594

I know that the docs need information on what's available, etc., but shouldn't that come down from within the VA healthcare system, not from a 20-year old cutie with a commission on their mind?

Edited by hedgey

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I am a diabetic. I take Metformin and Glipizide to control it. These two drugs are very effective and patients rely on them heavily. Now, I wonder how it came to be that doctors know to prescribe these drugs for diabetics. Could it be that many years back a sales rep walked into a doctor's office and promoted these drugs?

My point is this there is nothing wrong with pharmaceutical representatives promoting their products even if it means visiting doctor offices to do so. I believe doctors are smart enough know which meds to accept and which to reject. Further, medicines, before they are dispensed to patients must be approved by the FDA. That means a drug has gone through testing and has proven itself to be effective against a given disease.

Many doctors do not keep pace with every development in the medical field. Representatives from pharmaceuticals, medical equipment and supplies, software and hardware manufacturers, etc., hit the road and make personal contact with doctors to let them know what is available. So, if you have chosen your doctor carefully, I am sure he or she is smart enough to look after your interest.

Edited by Stilt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a diabetic. I take Metformin and Glipizide to control it. These two drugs are very effective and patients rely on them heavily. Now, I wonder how it came to be that doctors know to prescribe these drugs for diabetics. Could it be that many years back a sales rep walked into a doctor's office and promoted these drugs?

My point is this – there is nothing wrong with pharmaceutical representatives promoting their products even if it means visiting doctor offices to do so. I believe doctors are smart enough know which meds to accept and which to reject. Further, medicines, before they are dispensed to patients must be approved by the FDA. That means a drug has gone through testing and has proven itself to be effective against a given disease.

Many doctors do not keep pace with every development in the medical field. Representatives from pharmaceuticals, medical equipment and supplies, software and hardware manufacturers, etc., hit the road and make personal contact with doctors to let them know what is available. So, if you have chosen your doctor carefully, I am sure he or she is smart enough to look after your interest.

Stilt,

I completely agree with you and thank you for presenting the other side of the story.

My wife worked in a doctor's office for 12 years. She saw many pharmaceutical reps come thru and sat thru most of the new drug presentations because she was the office nurse and learned a lot in doing so. She said the only freebies she ever saw were the samples that were left at the office and a rare pre-arranged lunch for the entire office (for a new drug presentation). The drugs samples they left helped many people that wouldn't have been able to pay for the medications themselves. Many of these pharmaceutical companies have special programs for low income people that can't afford their drugs. The purpose of having reps see the physician was/is to introduce new drugs, teach the side effects and interactions, discuss any issues/problems with their medications and put samples of the product in the doctor's hands so he can try them. With the amount of new drugs being introduced on a regular basis, this is extremely helpful for physicians. If not for pharmaceutical reps, they could easily stick with the old products never realizing that there were newer and better options for their patients.

I'm not saying there's no corruption. There could be but there's a lot of good being done by pharmaceutical reps and the doctors that receive & prescribe the drugs too.

Edited by chr49

CHR49

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

My HMO Doc's office no longer gives or gets samples. They don't want to play that game anymore.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been scandalous stories about these reps.

As a phone system technician I was a fly on the wall to people and worked extensively in medical offices, so I've wondered about them for quite some time.

Every trip to the doc's they want me to take 2 or 3 more pills; I refuse and only take 1 daily medication.

Sales is a dirty business.... :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been scandalous stories about these reps.

As a phone system technician I was a fly on the wall to people and worked extensively in medical offices, so I've wondered about them for quite some time.

Every trip to the doc's they want me to take 2 or 3 more pills; I refuse and only take 1 daily medication.

Sales is a dirty business.... :wink:

Instead of disobeying doctor orders why don't you find a doctor that you can trust. Or, better yet, ask the doctor to explain what purpose each pill serves. Otherwise, what is the point to going to a doctor for a problem and ignoring his/her instructions. Today, scientist can manufacture a particular drug to do a specific function. Take my case for example, I am a diabetic and have been prescribed Metformin and Glipizide to control it. Why both? Read here. If I follow your logic and stop using one of the meds, my blood sugars would go through the roof. If you keep disobeying doctor instructions you are really going to be Notorious, Notoriously dead. You don't strike me as a person trained in the chemistry of medicines. You should stop acting like you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am glad some of us here still belive in the tooth fairy and Easter Bunny. Vioxx killed a few thousand people, but we will never know since the ones who could testify are all dead. Please tell me why drugs sold in the USA are ten times as expensive as any place else on earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use