Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Should I Waive The Bva Hearing?

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

I've been searching the forums and can't quite seem to pin this down:

I received a letter confirming that the BVA was ready to schedule my video telecon. At the bottom of the letter were checkboxes. 1. Appear in person. 2. Have the requested traveling board. 3. Switch to a video telecon (thought I had already requested this change) 4. Waive the hearing all together and have the case reviewed.

I'm considering option 4. Things are getting worse, and if this is approved (they rated me at 40% for knees, reduced to 20% due to it being a pre-existing condition .... it's NOT; occurred while in service), it could push me to 100% schedular. In short, I have a lot riding on the outcome of this decision, but sooner would be better than later.

Has anyone else out there done this? If so, what were your results? Any help would really be helpful.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I've been searching the forums and can't quite seem to pin this down:

I received a letter confirming that the BVA was ready to schedule my video telecon. At the bottom of the letter were checkboxes. 1. Appear in person. 2. Have the requested traveling board. 3. Switch to a video telecon (thought I had already requested this change) 4. Waive the hearing all together and have the case reviewed.

I'm considering option 4. Things are getting worse, and if this is approved (they rated me at 40% for knees, reduced to 20% due to it being a pre-existing condition .... it's NOT; occurred while in service), it could push me to 100% schedular. In short, I have a lot riding on the outcome of this decision, but sooner would be better than later.

Has anyone else out there done this? If so, what were your results? Any help would really be helpful.

Where did this letter from above come from ?

Something here does not sound right at all.

If the BVA says they are "ready to schedule my video telecon." then the issues from

that appeal would already be past the DRO hearing or DRO DeNovoReview level.

Did you receive any SOC's / SSOC's on the issues in question ?

Do you have appeals in at different levels ?

I am editing my post here to add that - if the BVA told me they were

"ready to schedule my video telecon." I would be going for that, but that's

only what I would do.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What Carlie is saying makes sense to me. If you are set up for video conference then I would go with that instead of kicking it back to the DRO. It is a matter of time. I don't think I read your post correctly. If you pull it back at this point and go to the DRO it will probably be another 12-18 months, and you may end up at the BVA anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's from the ATL VARO. Looks like they want to show other options. Video was one they seem to focus on; they say it's quicker. They also say I can opt for a "local hearing before regional office decision-makers. We can hold this instead of a Travel Board hearing, or we can hold it in addition to a BVA hearing. However, requesting both a local and a BVA hearing may result in additional time needed to process your appeal."

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

I had two sucessful video BVA video conferences. The option wasn't on the letter. I had to write it in.

If it catches a remand it will to the AMC and back to the VARO anyway.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Most Vets advocates agree that you should elect a DRO before the BVA.

I look at it like this:

Each Veteran is given 5 unscratched lottery tickets, any one of which may be a winner. By skipping the DRO, he is throwing away an unscratched lottery ticket.

1. VARO

2. DRO

3. BVA

4 CAVC

5. Federal courts.

I always avoid hearings, because I dont hear well, and I am bound to mess it up. Others do well with hearings.

The "downside" of the DRO is that it does take time. So does everything else at the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's from the ATL VARO. Looks like they want to show other options. Video was one they seem to focus on; they say it's quicker. They also say I can opt for a "local hearing before regional office decision-makers. We can hold this instead of a Travel Board hearing, or we can hold it in addition to a BVA hearing. However, requesting both a local and a BVA hearing may result in additional time needed to process your appeal."

This simply is not how it works.

Can you please answer as to if you have received SOC's/ SSOC's for the issues included in your appeal.

Also, did you or a VSO submit a Form 9 - to begin your Substantive Appeal ?

Here is a link to the process for BVA :

http://www.bva.va.gov/docs/Pamphlets/010202A.pdf

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use