Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ssdi (Recon)

Rate this question


Rangerwaldo

Question

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

That is very good - make sure your Recon Request is filed within the SSA deadline.

This does appear to suggest that you will need a SSA payee. DO you have a spouse for that if SSA declares incompetency?

In our experience, SSA awarded my husband first for a catastrophic stroke and sent the ssa money directly to my husband.However his brain trauma was so extensive it was hard to believe SSA considered him competent-he could not even determine bills and change anymore nor write a legible check.

SSA then upon recon awarded him instead solely for PTSD and the EED was vastly better then the CVA and involved a very large retro. They (SSA) called him up and said that due to this PTSD award they were going to declare him incompetent but he could appeal that anytime he wanted to.

He told SSA he liked it. Because he could now tell those student people who were pressuring him that now he was suffering not only from PTSD and significant brain damage but he was incompetent too so they might as well stop calling.

(The VA signed a form that waved his small Student loan balance a month later.)

The VA considered him competent until he died however.

SSA incompetency is just like VA incompetency. It is primary BS but is done to protect the SSA beneficiary or veteran.

The SSA might NOT declare you incompetent at all but what I saw here shows they possibly could.

It is an excellent report in my opinion.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Berta,

I filed the recon within the SSA"s timeframe. I had a funny feeling they might declare me incompetent after I got these forms back. It's no big deal if they do because my wife would become the payee. I just want to make sure my wife and kids are taken care of if anything ever happened to me. My Adult Report that I filled out awhile ago differs a little from my therapists report, ie. cooking, cleaning etc. Is that a big deal in your opinion? I never really talked to her (therapist) about that stuff she kind of put that in there on her own. Just wondering?

Waldo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Is that a big deal in your opinion?" It could be.

In our situation I stated to SSA that my husband would turn the stove on and then walk away and forget about it.

I was a livestock farmer and if I heard the fire alarms go off, I would run from the barn to the house.

It was not safe for him to use the stove.

This could have been due to both his CVA and his PTSD. I think PTSD affected his short term memory a lot.

He had daily flashbacks and could not absorb or recall info during some of these flashbacks.

Oddly enough when he worked for the VA his job (too involved to explain this here) prevented a prominent flashback he had daily from occuring during work hours.

He did help me clean but was limited by his CVA-I dont know if PTSD limits ones ability to clean.

SSA is looking for ANY type of work one can preform with their disability.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Berta,

It was the cooking and cleaning my therapist put in there that I do on a daily basis. I never had that type of conversation with her that I can remember. She is newer in the office that I have been going to for a long time. On my Adult report I put that I help out with the cooking and cleaning when Im able. It's just not on a daily basis. I hope this explains it a little better.

Waldo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

waldo,

Who were you employed by when you were sent to work a detail at ground zero ?

I feel it would be helpful in this mental health opinion if that would have been expounded on a bit to help

form some support for the examiners medical rationale.

The examination results you posted (for mental health) contain some evidence that I feel will be damaging to your claim for SSDI benefits.

I feel that the provider has contradicted themselves with the answers they marked on the form versus the narrative at the bottom portion.

Also, up by the top, question # 3

"Are any other capabilities affected by the impairment?"

Answer : NO

Some of the statements in the narrative that I take issue with are as follows:

"Mr. ___ is able to register his attention and is able to recall goals of therapy and

efforts to achieve them. He responds to complex commands, "

"There is no evidence of serious cognitive impairment."

"He has not been able to maintain many friendships over his life."

"Mr. ____ is able to concentrate. He is a frequent reader and is able to start and finish the daily

newspaper as well as the occasion book. It is Mr. ____ familial obligation to pick up his

children from school and prepare evening meals. Mr. ___ performs these duties on a regular

basis."

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was with an agency in massachusetts when I went to ground zero. All that Info is in my va and private medical records (Mental) which SS has finally got. The Rfc form that I posted (Mental) is from my Va psychiatrist. I have seen him off and on for the last 15+ years. The other form that I posted is from a therapist (She is newer) in an office that I have been going to for a long time also. The Dr. I usually see there is semi retired so I couldn't get in to see him. I get what your saying that the two forms contradict one another a bit. The letter that the newer therapist wrote took some added liberties in writing up her report. I do not remember having conversations with her or the regular Dr. about cooking, cleaning, reading newspapers and books etc. on a daily basis. I do these things when Im able just not on a daily basis. I told SS On my Adult disability form that I do these things when Im able. Maybe this does hurt me I don't know?

Waldo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use