Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Bonuses

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

Any way you slice it, the Va doling out $111 million in Exec bonuses while Veterans wait in a million man line for benefits, is a disgrace. Whether you blame congress, or the VA, it is still very unfair to Vets. I think the blame is shared. Congress gives the VA the freedom to spend this money where they want, and the VA abuses this discretion.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the bonus's that really make us angry its the fact that they are rewarded in a system that is by far the stupidest system ever to be created, the amount of rules and regulations that are created to deny any claims and time it takes should be unconstitutional.

The percentages of disability is such a scam, it takes tens of thousands of people to perform this task.

I think that it needs to be a lot simpler, and no I have no idea how to make this happen, but what I do have is a big question?

Why is there so many little pockets of veterans and not a huge group of us that require the begging of the congress to get our vote, than deals could be made to help fix the VA and the years it takes to get denied.

For 80 years, we just keep letting them decide our fate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonuses for VA managers suck

for those that know higher math, add a few suck exponents to how many mangers that suck at their job...

for every claim that gets denied and then takes many years for it to be reversed and given to the sick disabled vet, the va manager should get money taken, away... so they have an incentive to actually read the documents and get the claim right the first time,,, how about they sign a document that says 'I read all lthe evidence, under penalty of prosecution, being fired, etc..' they have no clue the suffering they could prevent if they actually did their jobs correctly. and read the evidence... it sickens me to think the screwups actually get bonuses on top of being paid to be stupid...

post-5809-0-53242400-1321837950_thumb.jp

Not in appeals, since I got 100%, and some of it was winning an 1151 negligence, which the VA turns out does not give ful benefits if you win 1151 negligence they squirm and legal loophhole you and your family out of many benefits, really crapp nasty bunch running the va benefits, they wil backstab and scre wyou even if you win you lose. May 2021.

01-01-11_My_Medical_Records2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A bonus for doing your job properly? Hah! That's why people get paid in the first place. These days, many workers in private industry are lucky to keep the job they have.

In not a few instances, workers are being told that there pay will stay the same or even decrease, and the only alternative is to go find a job elsewhere.

A bonus may be paid for accomplishments above and beyond the normal duties of a position, but not for competent performance in the position.

The VA is in a similar position to a company that is going bankrup, or Krupp industries during WWII. Seems that Krupp's factories were bombed out, no production, etc.

Yet the administrative headquarters was churning out paper as if the plants were in full production, and had a full to overflowing staff. There were serious repercussions when the German government (such as it was) found out. Something about the Eastern front needing more "cannon fodder".

The VA is a bureaucrats wet dream. Horribly inefficient and redundant system. Years to do things that the SSA (as slow as it is) seems to be able to do in months, and a real error rate that is through the roof. Penalty for error? What penalty? A veteran cannot collect interest on long delayed payment, and is (if lucky) paid in depreciated dollars. Quotas are for quantity, not quality. It's easier (and faster) to deny a claim, and get credit, than it is to get credit for an approved claim.

I know this is not the way the VA thinks. But the bonuses should be given to the agencies that exceed satisfactory performance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intent od the "incentives" and "bonuses" are for retention of stellar employees.

The intent per the audit/report - is not being followed.

The audits/ reports is about the only way to hold their feet to the fire on this issue,

so they can be held accountable.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Carlie,

I do not think there is really any way to effectively hold the VA s feet to the fire. The OIG, then Oversight Committees, and the House and Senate subcommittees keep identifying the problems with the bonus system yet it just keeps on ginning along. How can the VA continue to just ignore these institutions that are suppose to keep them in check? It is so frustrating seeing the abuse of the system and then being paid bonuses for really little to no performance. I just am at a loss of how to best keep this thing from continuing to operate and wasting tax dollars. Its like the members of Congress know what is going on but noone wants to get in there and stop it. Carlie am I missing something here and maybe being too critical of the VA and these attempts to keep the VA in check? As always NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use