Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Bonuses

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

I agree. We Vets were asked to "tighten our belt because of the economy" and accept a zero Cola for 2 years, while VA execs collected an average extra $14 grand while the VA worsened the backlog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The VA established in a "mission statement" that it would act on claims applications within 125 days and with a 98 percent accuracy rate.

What world are they in, I'm 180 days in the decision phase for an Increase for TDIU. Iris called me yesterday and stated "Your on Track",

It's just a waiting game, but can get frustrating.

NJ

"Hang in there and Fight"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All ,,,,,YES 111 MILLION DOLLARS IN BONUSES........ This was on VA Watchdog site and of course Jim is got it up this past week. Now this should really be interesting if it was not so sick. When will this insanity stop. Sounds like Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae Execs are running the VA. NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Report Highlights: Audit of RetentionIncentives For Veterans HealthAdministration and VA Central OfficeEmployeesWhy We Did This AuditVA uses retention incentives to retainemployees in hard-to-fill positions andemployees who possess high-level or uniquequalifications the Department does not want tolose. In FY 2010, VA paid nearly $111 millionin retention incentives to 16,487 employees.We conducted this audit to determine theadequacy of Veterans Health Administration(VHA) and VA Central Office (VACO)processes for awarding retention incentives.What We FoundVHA and VACO approving officials did notadequately justify and document retentionincentive awards in accordance with VApolicy. VA lacked clear guidance, oversight,and training to effectively support the program.VA officials did not effectively use thePersonnel and Accounting Integrated Datasystem to generate timely review notices. VAofficials also did not always stop retentionincentives at the end of set payment periods.Based on these findings, we questioned theappropriateness of 96 (80 percent) of 120 VHAincentives and 30 (79 percent) of 38 VACOincentives we reviewed. These incentivestotaled about $1.06 million in FY 2010.What We RecommendWe recommend the Assistant Secretary forHuman Resources and Administration, incoordination with the Under Secretary forHealth and the Deputy Assistant Secretary forthe Corporate Senior Executive ManagementOffice, revise and clarify guidance governingthe retention incentive program. Werecommend the Assistant Secretary forHuman Resources and Administrationinstitute controls to ensure that VA officialseffectively stop benefits at the end of established payment periods, and notifyresponsible officials regarding awardspending review.We recommend the Under Secretary forHealth, the Assistant Secretary for HumanResources and Administration, and theDeputy Assistant Secretary for theCorporate Senior Executive ManagementOffice conduct 100 percent reviews of retention incentives under their purviewand stop unnecessary payments. Theseofficials should provide the oversight andtraining needed to ensure responsibleofficials properly justify and documentretention incentives awards.Agency CommentsVA senior officials concurred with ourreport recommendations and providedacceptable corrective action plans. We willfollow up on implementation of theinitiated and planned corrective actions.BELINDA J. FINNAssistant Inspector Generalfor Audits and Evaluationsi3-5b3c5d5f86.jpg3-5b3c5d5f86.jpg

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very sad. They will spend money to send us off to war of country we never heard of, but when we get home they don't remember us or the war!

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. We Vets were asked to "tighten our belt because of the economy" and accept a zero Cola for 2 years,

while VA execs collected an average extra $14 grand while the VA worsened the backlog.

Just for clarification -

The VA doesn't decide whether VBA beneficiaries receive a COLA or not.

Some people understand this and some continue to post and insinuate that this is

an issue under VA's control.

There is plenty of REAL reasons to not be content with the VA -

COLA's - are not one of them.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use