Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chronic Adjustment Disorder Or Dysthymic Disorder

Rate this question


scscrewed

Question

In the military, I suffered an injury and was diagnosed with chronic adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Once out of the military, I continued my treatment at the VA and a new diagnosis was placed upon me about fourteen months later dysthymic disorder with recurrent MDD. Fast forward seven years, and I am still being treated for DD and MDD, and I have tried to kill myself several times. Does it matter if the rating is for Adjustment disorder or for the DD and MDD?

I am at 100 percent, but if I am re-evaluated I don't want them saying that I don't have adjustment disorder anymore, but DD and MDD and because it was diagnosed fourteen months out of service instead of twelve months out of service I don't want the DD and MDD not counted as service connected. I pretty paranoid, but you'll have that with a guy whose only medical coverage is the VA, and his shrink just cancelled his next appointment; I mean I tried to kill myself on the thirteenth of November. Can my dependents sue for wrongful death if they know I'm in this state, but don't help me? It doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I think those are new claims for the ED and loss of foot. Again...I don't think your VSO/DAV is giving you very good advice. I think that the others are right here on this one. But anytime you open up your old claim, the VA is going to take a look at your previous SC's and make sure that you still rate the ratings that they gave you previously. Keep in mind that you aren't alone - and I am not just talking about your family. I mean as a Vet. We try and take care of each other on here by offering support and by far the best knowledge I have seen anywhere.

"A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of 'up to and including my life.'" (Author unknown)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does asking for P and T open my claim back up for review? And, if I was granted automobile hand device grant shouldn't SMC been granted automatically? It doesn't matter too much. The VSO said that at the ten year mark they couldn't severe any of rated service connected items and at twenty they couldn't reduce them. We're worried, because they're a good chance if the pressure swore on my leg doesn't heel the Navy docs get their way and it comes off, and the rating for the amputation is only 60 percent; I know 80 percent with the leg and 60 percent without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you ask for P&T they will take a look at your claim to see if you have improved or remained static. You might want a letter from a doctor saying your conditions are static.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SC,

to us...everything matters. we are all in the battle for our claims. people here care. that's what bands us together here on this site. i am glad that you seem to be doing the research also. you are going to find as you dig deeper that there are others here that share the same issues as you. so you are probably helping others also. yes, by asking for P&T that opens up your claim. asking for a letter from your doc for your conditions remaing static is the right way to go on that one. but take one thing at a time. you don't have to fight the battle all alone. gather your evidence, go over it, look at what you are already SC'ed for - make sure your prior conditions have not changed. if you get a lawyer check and see if they work on contingency.

"A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of 'up to and including my life.'" (Author unknown)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

That is very good advice USMCGirl. I don't like the way SCscrewed's DAV rep talks about him or the process. I would dump that guy quick. Get a rep who supports you and understands your issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scscrewed,

I don't have any direct interaction with VSO's, but it seems to me if our VSO's and Veterans organizations were truly fighting for Veterans we would have gained some ground by now!

It is possible the VSO is worried you might lose, it is also possible they don't want to put forth the effort. Yours is not the garden variety simple claim. They may feel they have done enough to get you to where you are now.

I do think you need to rethink something though. You mention the pressure sore and amputation and that if amputated your leg is only 60% not 80%. The percentage of your disability shouldn't be the deciding factor in your medical care. What is best for your health and you as a human being needs to be the deciding factor. Have you filed for SSDI? If you have, what do the exams and paperwork from that rating or review say? If you haven't, maybe you should file and see what they say. It may add an additional set of favorable medical records and doctors opinons to prevent a future reduction. If sucessful it will increase the services/resources available to you.

Best regards,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use