Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Takes Heat For Suicides

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Family members are getting fed up enough to Sue:

http://www.veteransforcommonsense.org/index.php/veterans-category-articles/2586-kristin-hall

In the second case at the right hand side , the widow asked for 10 Million.I don't think that is enough.Then again whatever award might be obtained-it is meaningless when one considers what an FTCA award represents.

My husband's 1151 claim and then my FTCA claim had,as the initial focus, the fact that his PTSD was not being treated properly by VA and he stated in the last paragraph of his 1151 claim that, since his PTSD treatment was so inappropriate he feared the VA would also cause his death by misdiagnosing heart disease or causing him to have another major stroke.(which had been misdiagnosed for about a month)

The final reports from OGC reveal he was right on the heart disease and his stroke and they became 1151 and now IHD and CVA are Directly SCED due to an additional malpracticed condition he had, by VA award of last year.

When the VA settled with me, they never made any reference at all to his PTSD charges or to mine.I had stated along with my evidence of malpractice for the FTCA case that his SC PTSD rated at 100% P & T posthumously back to 3 years before he died (with only a 30 % rating and a pending appeal on that in is lifetime) proved the VA was negligent in properly assessing the extent of his PTSD and that if he didnt have PTSD from the Vietnam War he would have went to a real doctor for all of his medical care but he felt the VA knew how to treat his PTSD better then any civilian shrink would.

I expect a AO IHD decision soon.The medical evidence would warrant 60% due to an ECHO.I told them to keep the 60% and , after having found additional medical evidence that even the OGC didnt consider for the FTCA claim-I want a 100% rating for

his IHD for part of the period between the ECHO and his death with this additional medical evidence of record sionce Aug 1994 which VA has never considered.I also can use med recs from the PTSD inhouse program to support that.

I guess my point here is that PTSD ,if not treated properly by the VA, can cause additional disability and death.

I never griped about that part of my FTCA award but I sure will if my Nehmer claim is wrong.

It takes either a strong IMO or some profound medical evidence from the record to prove PTSD can cause additional disability

or death from suicide or any other cause-however- if the standard of proper treatment has not been met by the VA, comparable to similiar care in the entire medical community, the VA , as shown above, can be sued.

I only know of one case where a vet sued under FTCA for PTSD.But these cases are not public record so there are surely more of them.

This case got national attention when the doctor who caused the veteran's PTSD via sexual harrassment had to give testimony on it that became public.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't think these VA personnel have a clue how to pick up on suicidal intent. They sometimes read from a sheet asking you if you want to hurt yourself. How many people are going to say "Yes" knowing the next stop may be the rubber room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On November 10, 2011 three different doctors at three different medical appointments did the screening with me. The questions basically were are you having thoughts of harming yourself: yes; have you attempted to commit suicide in the past: yes; do you currently have a plan to commit suicide: refused to answer; can you promise me that you won't try to hurt yourself before our next appointment: now doc how can I promise that. I have been thinking of killing myself since last Tuesday.

They then turned to mom. Mom you can watch to make sure he doesn't do anything right and just bring him in if your worried. She nods, tears in her eyes.

Then on the 19th I try to convince myself to take a bottle of ambien. I take some of it, but I can't take all of it. I got interrupted, but not caught. I then started thinking about wheeling my chair out in front of the one of the semis that cruise by the house.

Meet with the shrink on Dec. 2 and he brings his kids into saying that if I kill myself that it will hurt so many more people that I can imagine. His kids would wonder why he got fired, because the National VA would come down on the local and he would lose his job.

You know, that if you dose up a person with suicidal thoughts with lithium that it reduces and eliminates the thoughts. Takes about 72 hours. It's cheaper to send me home and flip the coin.

But you are right John, not many people will answer yes, and even answering yes doesn't even matter.

Edited by scscrewed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hell, I'm right there with you, I tell my therapist every damn session that I'm one frizzy thread of an unraveling rope away from jumping the jump. I tell him about my different plans; he calmly tells me why they would be likely to fail and leave me paralyzed or a vegetable.

My progress notes all say that I deny suicidal ideation. What the blazes do they call the fantasies of peace and silence? What do they call sitting on the side of the bed holding the dang gun and wondering how to keep the mess to a minimum?

Why, why, why does the VA not want to acknowledge this? Why isn't in my notes?

My DH says to be glad they leave it out, he thinks it would raise flags. I think a few homicidal intents might do that, but if the shrink ain't worried I'll come after him, what's the difference?

Sorry. I don't think I"m quite coherent... Serequel makes me dizzy (whoa, seriously) and a bit clumsy in the thought process department. Yay for spell check!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think the inadequate care for suicidal vets is due to costs. It costs alot to admit a vet to the rubber room. I know doctors have some legal responsibility to protect suicidal or homocidal vets from themselves. It has got to be about money. The VA is trying to save money at the costs of a certain number of suicides they find acceptable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tape recorders d---- it TAPE RECORDERS. We need to tape record every conversation we have with them, because they're like truckers and they fudge the books. Check your state law to see if your one party or two party. If your are one party state like Ohio only one person in the room needs to know that the recorder is on

These are the two party states,

Eleven states currently require that all parties consent to the recording. These states are:

  • California
  • Connecticut
  • Florida
  • Illinois (--if you're in the conversation --active participant you can record-- but no eavesdropping)
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • Pennsylvania
  • Washington

So you cannot record your doctor in these states, because you go to jail, but in Illinois you can, but it's against the statute but not against case law, go figure.

Again record your conversations with your VA doctor because they lie and write down fantasy that bite you in Chaucer's nethereye. However, don't do it in the above states, because you may go to prison. And this is my opinion and in no way constitutes legal advice or recommendations on actions or behaviors others should conduct themselves in.

And yes John they are trying to save money in 1999 average stay was 333 per night. I can't find the numbers right now, but I have stayed since my injury eleven months total in VA hospitals. So, that's expensive as hell.

Edited by scscrewed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use