Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

When I Die Will Wife Get My 30% Compensation?

Rate this question


les

Question

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Thanks, Berta. Generally, they treat widows with DIC just a little worse than Vets, making them fight for every nickel, just like Vets. The difference between Vets and Widows, is that there is quite a few people who know about jumping through the many hoops to get your benefits for the VET, but almost no one (except Berta) knows anything about DIC, to ensure that widows are "fed to the wolves".

The VA is striving to keep it that way. Vets can, if they have a computer and research skills, weave through the VA benefit maze, but widows are like a bunny in a den of wolves. The VA has shown they will lie, forge paperwork. (for an example of the VA faking Vets documents, look here: http://www.linehanpc.com/vadisabilityclaim/cushmanvshinseki.html )delay, or do anything to get out of paying benefits to widows or Vets. The VA knows that most widows wont be able to survive the hamster wheel they put em on to get their benefits, as it often takes 10 or 20 years.

While many may call me "negative" for calling the VA on this, I do think it is important for the Veteran to know that you simply can not beleive everything the VA tells you. I think if the VA "fakes" Vets documents ONCE, it probably will/does happen again, especially considering there is no evidence that the employees who faked this Vets evidence were ever prosecuted.

If this was the "real world", anyone caught tampering with evidence would do time in the slammer, but VA employees do so with immunity. They shred evidence to make their job easier, or just plain fake it. What angers me is if the Veteran was caught "faking" his documents, he would be nailed to the wall, but not a whisper about the VA employees who did so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

When I was a child in the 50's and 60's my mother got some kind of cash benefit from the VA for us kids after my father died. He was a disabled WWII vet, but not 100%, nor did he die from an SC condition. What happened with that benefit? We were poor so maybe that had something to do with it, but we were not on welfare and my mother did not get a war widow pension. She got my father's SSA.

To the question if you are 30% and you don't die from the SC condition your spouse gets nothing at this time. Oh, sorry, she might get an American flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sure doesn't hurt to try to get the spouse up to speed on the internet.Things are far easier then when I got my first PC in 1988.All they really need is a bookmark for hadit and the VA web site as the DIC regs are in both places.

As long as they,in the event of your death, get a VCAA letter that conforms to Hupp V Nicholson, they will have an exact statement of everything they need to succeed.

But if a spouse got a decision like the one I got 3 weeks ago,they might just believe the VA and walk away.

If they had a vet rep, the rep might have said well that's that and then see them out the door.

I told VA to CUE themselves on it and they did and said it is now considered a new AO IHD claim and awaits an expeditious medical opinion for the rating.

As Broncovet said "I do think it is important for the Veteran to know that you simply can not beleive everything the VA tells you." Or tells a widow.

That is a prime facie fact.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An example from my mom's experience.

Step-dad suffered from what VA could only call 'rheumatism, traveling, unexplained'. He also had Adult Onset Diabetes. The VA recognized the diabetes as service connected due to Agent Orange. he also was 70% for PTSD. He ended up TDIU 100% dues to the PTSD. He died when the mystery rheumatism got into his lungs and there was absolutely nothing docs could do. He died after a week or so. My mom had been told by him that his entire VA comp would just keep coming to her. He knew this because...... the guys at Group Therapy told him that. never checked it out, never asked how they knew. Wrong answer. She applied for DIC and was denied because he didn't die from PTSD or Diabetes. No service connection related death, not 100% for 10 years (think it was 6, 6 1/2), no DIC. My mom was crushed. I first joined HadIt to research her situation. What we found out was that if the Dr who signed the death certificate amended it to include that his diabetes made controlling the rheumatoid impossible because his diabetes was so severe (which it did, we just never thought about it that way until forced to) the VA should then consider his death as related to his service connected diabetes.

Talked to his VA Dr who completely agreed to change the death certificate (not an uncommon thing I guess) to read "cause of death, rheumatoid fluid in lungs, un-treatable due to severe diabetes" and VA approved DIC back to date of death with no questions asked.

Life insurance....... very good advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use