Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Appeal - Suggestions Welcome

Rate this question


free_spirit_etc

Question

I have been out of the loop for awhile, so I am rusty on the NOD / Appeal process. I welcome any feedback concerning my proposed appeal. This would be an attachment to a Form V9.

Thanks in advance!

In Reference to: xxxxx

January 5, 2012

I am appealing the decision dated November 21, 2011 indicating the payment of $300 toward my husband’s burial plot represents a total grant of benefits sought on appeal.

I take exception to and preserve for appeal ALL errors the VARO may have made or the Board hereafter might make in deciding this appeal. This includes all legal errors, all factual errors, failure to follow M21-1, all due process errors and any failures to discharge the duty to assist as violation of basic VA laws and regulations within 38 USCS and 38 CFR.

Some of the specific errors of facts / law on the most recent decision which I disagree include, but are not limited to:

The decision indicates the $300 payment toward my husband’s burial plot represents a total grant of benefits sought on appeal.

I disagree that this decision represents a total grant of benefits sought on appeal, as the decision did not address:

  • My claim for Dependency & Indemnity Compensation (DIC) (appealed September 8, 2010)
  • My claim for Accrued Benefits based on my husband’s claim for service connection for his lung cancer, as well as any other benefits that were reasonably raised by the record at the time of his death, including increased rating for his other service connected conditions. (appealed September 8, 2010)
  • My claim / my son’s claim for Helpless Child Benefits. (BVA Form 9 submitted November 29, 2011)

The decision also indicates that the reimbursement is for the burial of a veteran whose death is not service connected.

As whether my husband died from a service connected condition has not been finally decided, I request to preserve the right to receive the service-related death burial benefit for my husband.

Respectfully submitted,

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Does burial expense include transportation to a VA cemetary? The actual amount the VA provides seems very inadequate. What is it ....$2000 bucks. That will buy a pine box including knot holes. Most of us AO vets are going to die from AO contributory causes. Can spouses also get buried in VA cemetaries?

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, as I recall the transport to a VA cemetery is part of the funeral bill.

I hate to bring this up but my husband was an organ donor and had to be cremated due to all the organ harvests.

As I recall the undertaker brought the cremains to the VA chapel in his own vehicle and had already packed some of the ashes for me to keep.

The organ harvest required an autopsy . .At the time of the autopsy I had no idea how critical those findings would be to all of my VA claims.

Yes, if the veteran is buried at a VA Cemetery, the wife can be too.But they must be buried like the vet was- cremains or casket-as far as I know.

The VA gave me the deed to the plot there for when I expire,right after the cemetery services.

I used the NVLSP recommendation on my formal I-9 form because the VA had made a legal error in my VCAA letter.

I tried to get my former vet res to support my position on the illegal VCAA letter but they would not help me.

The BVA caught the error, but by then I had mitigated the damages myself with evidence.

We have a topic here somewhere on this boilerplate statement.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does burial expense include transportation to a VA cemetary? The actual amount the VA provides seems very inadequate. What is it ....$2000 bucks. That will buy a pine box including knot holes. Most of us AO vets are going to die from AO contributory causes. Can spouses also get buried in VA cemetaries?

John

http://www.vba.va.go...ials/Burial.pdf

How Much Does VA Pay?

Service-Related Death. VA will pay up to $2,000 toward burial expenses for deaths on or after

September 11, 2001. VA will pay up to $1,500 for deaths prior to September 10, 2001. If the Veteran is

buried in a VA national cemetery, some or all of the cost of transporting the deceased may be reimbursed.

Non-service-Related Death. For deaths on or after October 1, 2011, VA will pay up to $700 toward

burial and funeral expenses (if hospitalized by VA at time of death), or $300 toward burial and funeral

expenses (if not hospitalized by VA at time of death), and a $700.00 plot-interment allowance (if not

buried in a national cemetery). For deaths on or after December 1, 2001, but before October 1, 2011, VA

will pay up to $300 toward burial and funeral expenses and a $300 plot-interment allowance. The plotinterment

allowance is $150 for deaths prior to December 1, 2001. If the death happened while the

Veteran was in a VA hospital or under VA contracted nursing home care, some or all of the costs for

transporting the Veteran’s remains may be reimbursed. An annual increase in burial and plot allowances,

for deaths occurring after October 1, 2011, begins in fiscal year 2013 based on the Consumer Price Index

for the preceding 12-month period.

http://www.cem.va.go...ne/eligible.asp

g. Spouses and Dependents

(1) The spouse or surviving spouse of an eligible Veteran is eligible for interment in a national cemetery even if that Veteran is not buried or memorialized in a national cemetery. In addition, the spouse or surviving spouse of a member of the Armed Forces of the United States whose remains are unavailable for burial is also eligible for burial.

(2) The surviving spouse of an eligible Veteran who had a subsequent remarriage to a non-Veteran and whose death occurred on or after January 1, 2000, is eligible for burial in a national cemetery, based on his or her marriage to the eligible Veteran.

(3) The minor children of an eligible Veteran. For purpose of burial in a national cemetery, a minor child is a child who is unmarried and:

(a) Who is under 21 years of age; or,

(b) Who is under 23 years of age and pursuing a full-time course of instruction at an approved educational institution.

(4) The unmarried adult child of an eligible Veteran. For purpose of burial in a national cemetery, an unmarried adult child is:

Of any age but became permanently physically or mentally disabled and incapable of self-support before reaching 21 years of age, or before reaching 23 years of age if pursuing a full-time course of instruction at an approved educational institution. Proper supporting documentation must be provided.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Free...

I think it is telling that VBM recommends this statment in appeals, while VSO's rarely do:

I take exception to and preserve for appeal ALL errors the VARO may have made or the Board hereafter might make in deciding this appeal. This includes all legal errors, all factual errors, failure to follow M21-1, all due process errors and any failures to discharge the duty to assist as violation of basic VA laws and regulations within 38 USCS and 38 CFR.

One would think that if the above statement helps even one Vet, the VSO's would even publish a "NOD form" and include it. They dont. The question is why dont VSO take this opportunity to help Vets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Free...

I think it is telling that VBM recommends this statment in appeals, while VSO's rarely do:

I take exception to and preserve for appeal ALL errors the VARO may have made or the Board hereafter might make in deciding this appeal. This includes all legal errors, all factual errors, failure to follow M21-1, all due process errors and any failures to discharge the duty to assist as violation of basic VA laws and regulations within 38 USCS and 38 CFR.

One would think that if the above statement helps even one Vet, the VSO's would even publish a "NOD form" and include it. They dont. The question is why dont VSO take this opportunity to help Vets?

I agree.... even if it helps just one Vet.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. Now I am confused, as usual, about dealing with the VA.

I had misplaced the letter when I was writing my appeal. (I know - bad move - but it got buried during finals week at school). So I went with the BVA appeal - as I had already filed my NOD on the matter.

Now, I looked over the letter again - to make sure I got it right before I mailed my appeal - and the letter tells me that if I disagree with the decision I need to file a NOD within one year.

The letter does not include a Statement of Case. But it does state "We made a decision on your Notice of Disagreement received on July 16, 2009 about one or more of your earlier decisions."

I am not sure why they made a decision on my NOD, but did not enclose a Statement of Case - but instructed me to file another NOD if I didn't agree.

I already filed a BVA appeal on the DIC and Accured Benefits claim on Sept. 8, 2010. So that should be protected (somewhat). But now that this letter paid me $300 burial - but states it represents the total grant of benefits sought (and they bolded the word "total") - Do I start over with a NOD? (as they instructed me to....)

I thought if they made a decision on an NOD they were supposed to issue a Statement of Case.

It gets confusing when they split up your claim into many different decisions, address them one at a time, but indicate the decision covers all your claims.

Edited by free_spirit_etc
Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use