Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Presumptive Eligibility For Psychosis And Other Mental Illness

Rate this question


Wings

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

See Attached !!

SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend the Department of Veterans

Affairs (VA) regulation authorizing tentative eligibility

determinations to comply with amended statutory authority concerning

statutory minimum active-duty service requirements.

This document also proposes to codify in regulation statutory

presumptions of medical-care eligibility for veterans of certain

wars and conflicts who developed psychosis within specified

time periods and for Persian Gulf War veterans who developed

a mental illness other than psychosis within two years after service

and within two years after the end of the Persian Gulf War period.

We believe that regulations are necessary because we

would interpret the law to allow VA to waive any copayments associated

with care pursuant to the statutory presumption and to waive any

otherwise applicable minimum service requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before April 30, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through

www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations

Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue

NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026.

(This is not a toll-free number). Comments should indicate that they

are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AN87, Tentative eligibility

determinations; Presumptive eligibility for psychosis and other mental

illness.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public

inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room

1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday

(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This

is not a toll-free number). In addition, during the comment period,

comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management

System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin J. Cunningham, Director,

Business Policy, Chief Business Office, Department of Veterans Affairs,

810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420; (202) 461-1599. (This is

not a toll-free number).

presumptive mental illness for GW vets.PDF

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Interesting, however, since their is still no end, technically to gulf war era, I would love to know how the VA is going to interpret this.

Meaning, two years from the end of the conflict, hence March 1991? Or, does this mean they are making "mental illness" a presumptive issue related to other gulf war presumptives? Its very confusing.

Edited by eganusn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

They will interpret in the most narrow way. Probably 2 years after discharge during Gulf War period whatever that is. Mental illness other than psychosis is very tricky language unless they meant only PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's VERY important for GW vets to comment on this issue at the

Regulations link Wings provided.

Comments must be received by VA on or before April 30, 2012.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

Comment, Comment, Comment!!! Anyone can, not just GW vets but their input is most important! ~Wings

Go Here http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=VA-2012-VHA-0010-0001

See "Submit a Comment" top, right hand side of page

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, I knew the VA could be "sneaky" but if this what I think it is, this is truly an atrocity. General Shinkseki and Colonel Gingrich should be ashamed of themselves for allowing this to be proposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use