Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Reducing Claims Back Log

Rate this question


boomer2

Question

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"The VA currently has a backlog of about 850,000 claims." Holy crap!!

"“In 2013, our goal is to ensure that no more than 40 percent of the compensation and pension claims in the pending inventory are more than 125 days old,” Shinseki said in his testimony to the Senate Armed Services Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Subcommittee." That's great but there are still more than 9 months left in 2012. What measures are they taking NOW??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

From watching Hadit it seems to me that they are starting to bring the back log down. Was over a million a while back and now it seems we have success stories every month instead of in bursts once or twice a year. Lets say I am cuatiously optimistic although I now have a claim that is 20 months old and stuck in Waco quagmire

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From watching Hadit it seems to me that they are starting to bring the back log down. Was over a million a while back and now it seems we have success stories every month instead of in bursts once or twice a year. Lets say I am cuatiously optimistic although I now have a claim that is 20 months old and stuck in Waco quagmire

Uh oh...mine is in Waco too! (Crosses fingers).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever they do -

I wish they would also make more effort in training and raise the expectancy

level of accuracy in adjudicating claims, to higher than 70 percent.

IMO - much of the backlog is due to inaccuracy during adjudication

which leads to appeals.

Does anyone have a number on how many of the 850,000 current claims,

fall into the APPEALS category ?

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carlie, a 30 percent error rate would not be acceptable for the post office. I worked for the post office and when we got a case check we had to have a 95% accuracy rate. We did not even have to have a HS diploma. These VA employees could not even make it on the graveyard shift at the post office.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Boomer,Pete, Carlie and John, Quay,

There may be a small decrease in the backlogs but the overall number "they" have reported is lower than the total,,,appeals also number. I posted a comment on the backlogs situation about 3 or 4 months ago and it was nearly 1.3 million or more. I also reported that during the reign of Jim Nicholson as Secretary, he reported to the House Veterans Subcommitte of a backlog of 750,000 in 2007. That number brought the dismay of many of the subcommitte members as unacceptable . Promises made to reduce it and the total number of days then to adjudicate a claim was 173 and he announced he was trying to bring it down to 145 which his answer was labled as "appaling" by one commitee member. Nothing has changed really. The number has continued to climb and I only can see the number has slowed some due to the hiring of 3500 new adjudicators 2 1/2 yrs ago to help with the Nehmer and Vietnam Era backlog. They have not finished 2009 claims and appeals. Mine was just awarded from 2009 NOD at the DRO.

Carlie is directly right on target. It is the fact that the adjudication process is so bad that the appeals process is backed up. The ROs cannot make a simple determination and have caused this huge problem. My claim is not different . Awarded a few which never should have needed a DRO and taken 5 years. Then to top it off they missed the Pulmonary Hypertension completely which results in an appeal and more dead time and delays.

John , how can ANYONE run a business like them and get bonuses and raises and even keep their job? It is so incredible.

Carlie ,,,back to your question of appeals and the number. I said the backlog is 1.3 million but they are saying 850,000...... both of these numbers do not take into account the appeals process alone. It must be staggering. Just think of how many of our Hadit family has appeals going and then look at how many Vets are not members of Hadit and are appealing. I would love to see that number from someone ....... and I do not want to see some VA propoganda to mislead us and Congress by giving us some number that is incorrectly lowballed. Good question and one that needs to go to the next HVAC or SVAC meetings.

It is so frustrating to see this fiasco... and as you pointed out Carlie, it is unecessary.

Above all every Vet because of this problem must dig in and NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use