Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Denial/evidence List

Rate this question


ArmyDaughter

Question

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

This is Bull S***, VA trying to cheat their way out of this. A Question, was any doctors the seen for DMII before these dates in 1997, or any Heart doctors any doctor !

It seen that you would have Ischemic Heart disease in a stage before you would have Congestive heart disease.

My first records that were send to VA from my Heart doctor said IHD, But this last test it made no refence to IHD, but the conditions is worst.

So if I filed now, Iwould not get anything????

Something wrong. Keep trying!! God Bless!!!

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he seen anyone for the DM, to be quite honest I have found alot of things that I didn't even know he had! The crazy thing is, I'm going through all his medical records and one visit will say "CHF, HTN, Sleep Apnea, Stroke" Then you go a few months down the road and there's no mention of one or more of them and then they add new ones in and then on the next visit you have another group of diagnosis!! It's confusing, and contradictory! Think it's their way of making you confused so you just give up! Or could just be a lack of competence.....lol

I know he went to a heart doctor back in the 90's and was diagnosed with CHF I believe (still going through records and trying to sort which doctor said what), but even by VA accounts and documents CHF is caused by IHD?!

Another thing, they told me this Nehmer thing was initiated by a former claim for IHD made by my dad....but then in the denial letter when it references denial for sc death it says "During the lifetime of the Veteran, he did not submit a claim for benefits based on ischemic heart disease"......seriously?!?

And one other question......dad wasn't service connected for anything which I found out when I received all this medical paperwork. But he shows as one of his rating decisions

"Ischemic Heart Disease (Previously rated as Congestive Heart Failure) [Agent Orang-Vietnam/Ischemic Heart Disease]

Not Service Connected, Not established by Presumption

Static Disability"

What is a static disability?? He has a couple different things listed as that.

Thanks!

Leah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he seen anyone for the DM, to be quite honest I have found alot of things that I didn't even know he had! The crazy thing is, I'm going through all his medical records and one visit will say "CHF, HTN, Sleep Apnea, Stroke" Then you go a few months down the road and there's no mention of one or more of them and then they add new ones in and then on the next visit you have another group of diagnosis!! It's confusing, and contradictory! Think it's their way of making you confused so you just give up! Or could just be a lack of competence.....lol

I know he went to a heart doctor back in the 90's and was diagnosed with CHF I believe (still going through records and trying to sort which doctor said what), but even by VA accounts and documents CHF is caused by IHD?!

Another thing, they told me this Nehmer thing was initiated by a former claim for IHD made by my dad....but then in the denial letter when it references denial for sc death it says "During the lifetime of the Veteran, he did not submit a claim for benefits based on ischemic heart disease"......seriously?!?

And one other question......dad wasn't service connected for anything which I found out when I received all this medical paperwork. But he shows as one of his rating decisions

"Ischemic Heart Disease (Previously rated as Congestive Heart Failure) [Agent Orang-Vietnam/Ischemic Heart Disease]

Not Service Connected, Not established by Presumption

Static Disability"

What is a static disability?? He has a couple different things listed as that.

Thanks!

Leah

It look they still looking at the wrong material. You need to refile and point to the statement made by them about IHD>

It like my Prostate cancer moves into my Lung and die from Lung cancer and thats not one the Agent orange conditions, But it cause the lung cancer and VA does not think its covered, I don't think so, It was connect!

So the CHF has some connection to IHD , And if they said it. It sound like a no brainer.

You might have to send their on record's back to them and underline the part they can see!

So dont give up!

Edited by SP4RVN1971

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have copies of the letters VA used dated 1997 rom Drs, Shakir and Strickland?

Are they both still in practice?

Do you have their private treament records?

The death certificate does not show IHD as contributing to death and that right there is a problem.

Was an autopsy done? If so,do you have a copy of it?

WAs a Doppler heart ECHO ever done? The results of a ECHO could potentially definitively rule in or out IHD.

I regret how much work this is for you.

I had to read my husband's VA med recs dozens of times. They were all handwritten and some were difficult to even read.

But the 2 doctor's whose letters VA relied upon heavily- if I were you I would try to contact them and get any med recs available they might still have.

If they know the problem you are havng ,one of them might be wiling to eveh prepare an IMO,if they agree that IHD was present and maybe the CHF was secondary to it.

IMOs can be costly. But some doctors charge little or even no fee if they treated the vet personally.

I feel this claim will take a strong IMO,if there is documented medical evidence of IHD, because the IHD is not listed on the death certificate. Cardiac arrythmia can have many causes.

If an autopsy was done, that too would surely reveal more info on his heart disease.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use