Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Gaf Score

Rate this question


Moody

Question

how does the va caculate your GAF score into there decision I really dont know much about it but I have a claim in for PTSD and my GAF is 55 some any help in understanding this will be greatly approciated .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

no its fine I wasnt upset at all I just like the conversation I read on the fourms all the time and I dont care who post what and where its all good reading plus like I said when you get a chance to talk to someone on the inside you better take it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Veldrina. The Lady on the 1-800 # could not find a request for an increase. Now, should they not re-rate me or at least send me a letter telling me something? When, you say "the examiner seems to hit all the points we use for rating purposes." What does that mean? Also, how would you rate this and how would you handle the eating issue?

Papa

Did u get letters saying they were going to re-rate u? if they can't find your request for an increase (u put one in, no?) then that's the office's fault & they should still set u up if they started development. Re "hitting the points", i meant there are certain things asked on the interview that go into the rating, such as "do u have panic attacks? frequency? Are you oriented x3 (to person/place/time), your appearance at the interview (were you restless, lacking hygiene, staring vacantly, monotone, etc) Re the rating i would need to have all the medical evidence in front of me to really give u a sound answer, sorry...we do not, however, have any guidance re eating disorders secondary to PTSD. Obesity itself has not been linked to PTSD, from the few cases I have seen, because this is a physical condition that normally isn't service-connected. An eating disorder is usually its own rating. Everyone handles PTSD symptoms differently....some self-medicate with alcohol or drugs, some ppl eat, some ppl have no appetite. Personally i think that eating should be treated like drinking, in that it is a coping behavior, but the medical world doesnt really care about my opinion. Thus far, I have only seen alcohol/drugs as part of the PTSD claim (secondary but not separated from the PTSD as it would have no evaluation of its own), never an eating disorder, & therefore no obesity linked. Perhaps that will change as more vets appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a call from my Attorney's Office, and they said the PTSD came from a 2009 appeal from the DAV that had my POA at the time. The Attorney is calling the Houston RO to find out what is going on.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am always glad to see Veldrina here as she is certainly a hard worker, but still willing to share her expertise- Plus I love her photo!

Papa I found this BVA award:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp10/Files4/1030679.txt

It was an appeal of the veteran's EED but.......

“ORDER

A TDIU is denied prior to June 8, 2006.

A TDIU is granted from June 8, 2006, subject to the legal

authority governing the payment of VA compensation.”

The veteran had already established a 70-% SC for PTSD with an eating disorder in June 2006

"However, the Board finds that the collective evidence of record

since June 8, 2006 indicates that the Veteran has been

unemployable due to service-connected psychiatric disability. In

June 2006, the Veteran was dismissed from the university where

she was pursuing her degree, and a physician and social worker

both found her PTSD with major depression and an eating disorder

to be contributing to her unemployability. The Board

acknowledges that the Medical Director of the PTSD program at the

VA Health Care System in New Jersey and social worker noted that

the Veteran was unemployable due to PTSD along with her

"physical ailments," and that service connection had not yet

been award for some physical disabilities in June 2006. However,

the Board finds notes that service connection for PTSD, major

depression, and an eating disorder resulting in morbid obesity-a

physical ailment-was then in effect. As such, the Board finds

that the June 2006 statements of the Medical Director and social

worker can be reasonably interpreted as including her physical

ailments resulting from her PTSD and eating disorder, for which

she was service connected at a 70 percent rating in June 2006.

In further support of this sentiment, on VA examination in

February 2008, the examiner found her unemployable due to her

PTSD, depression, eating disorder, and resulting morbid obesity. “

In this case ,the medical evidence warranted not only the finding of the SC PTSD (the prime disability)

but included the eating disorder as part of the rating.

I certainly agree with Veldrina as I have seen many TV shows on obesity and eating disorders that stem from depression or anxiety disorders that PTSD actually is. Food is being recognized as an addiction by many in the medical community and certainly as a coping behavior for stress.

But to get VA to grant PTSD with an eating disorder, as this BVA case shows, needs very strong medical evidence.

Even some meds might cause an eating disorder,in my opinion, because many meds increase the appetite and/or alter the metabolism.

One med ,forget what, not long ago was on the news because it was causing people to get up in the middle of the night and start eating a lot.

The VA does have a C & P worksheet exam for eating disorders and recognizes them , but it certainly takes very strong medical evidence to association any physical disability with a mental disability.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am always glad to see Veldrina here as she is certainly a hard worker, but still willing to share her expertise- Plus I love her photo!

Papa I found this BVA award:

http://www.va.gov/ve...es4/1030679.txt

It was an appeal of the veteran's EED but.......

“ORDER

A TDIU is denied prior to June 8, 2006.

A TDIU is granted from June 8, 2006, subject to the legal

authority governing the payment of VA compensation.”

The veteran had already established a 70-% SC for PTSD with an eating disorder in June 2006

"However, the Board finds that the collective evidence of record

since June 8, 2006 indicates that the Veteran has been

unemployable due to service-connected psychiatric disability. In

June 2006, the Veteran was dismissed from the university where

she was pursuing her degree, and a physician and social worker

both found her PTSD with major depression and an eating disorder

to be contributing to her unemployability. The Board

acknowledges that the Medical Director of the PTSD program at the

VA Health Care System in New Jersey and social worker noted that

the Veteran was unemployable due to PTSD along with her

"physical ailments," and that service connection had not yet

been award for some physical disabilities in June 2006. However,

the Board finds notes that service connection for PTSD, major

depression, and an eating disorder resulting in morbid obesity-a

physical ailment-was then in effect. As such, the Board finds

that the June 2006 statements of the Medical Director and social

worker can be reasonably interpreted as including her physical

ailments resulting from her PTSD and eating disorder, for which

she was service connected at a 70 percent rating in June 2006.

In further support of this sentiment, on VA examination in

February 2008, the examiner found her unemployable due to her

PTSD, depression, eating disorder, and resulting morbid obesity. “

In this case ,the medical evidence warranted not only the finding of the SC PTSD (the prime disability)

but included the eating disorder as part of the rating.

I certainly agree with Veldrina as I have seen many TV shows on obesity and eating disorders that stem from depression or anxiety disorders that PTSD actually is. Food is being recognized as an addiction by many in the medical community and certainly as a coping behavior for stress.

But to get VA to grant PTSD with an eating disorder, as this BVA case shows, needs very strong medical evidence.

Even some meds might cause an eating disorder,in my opinion, because many meds increase the appetite and/or alter the metabolism.

One med ,forget what, not long ago was on the news because it was causing people to get up in the middle of the night and start eating a lot.

The VA does have a C & P worksheet exam for eating disorders and recognizes them , but it certainly takes very strong medical evidence to association any physical disability with a mental disability.

Most people can not relate to the fact that some people have a food addiction. I joined OA several years ago, and they use the same concept as AA, the 12 step process. In fact, we had a speaker come one night from AA, and he said something very profound: A person does not need drugs and/or booze to live, but a person must have food to survive. I think the Doctor made the connection as she Dx'd me with OCD.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use